Index
Advancing Methodologies of Conducting Literature Review in Management Domain
ISBN: 978-1-80262-372-7, eISBN: 978-1-80262-371-0
ISSN: 2754-5865
Publication date: 24 November 2023
This content is currently only available as a PDF
Citation
(2023), "Index", Rana, S., Singh, J. and Kathuria, S. (Ed.) Advancing Methodologies of Conducting Literature Review in Management Domain (Review of Management Literature, Vol. 2), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 161-165. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2754-586520230000002010
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2024 Sudhir Rana. Published under exclusive licence by Emerald Publishing Limited
INDEX
Accounting
, 79–80
Adjutant
, 67–68
Agriculture
, 79–80
Analytical hierarchy process (AHP)
, 13, 16–17, 19
Antecedents, decisions, and outcomes (ADO)
, 2–3, 134
Appraisal
, 149–150
Arbitrariness
, 58
Assessment of multiple systematic reviews (AMSTAR)
, 112, 134
Australian Business Dean’s Councils (ABDC)
, 7
Author-centric approach
, 48
Author’s skills
, 114–116
Axial coding
, 31–32
Barlett’s test (BT)
, 9
Biases of traditional reviews
, 58
Bibexcel
, 61–62, 64–65, 89
Bibliometrics
, 31–32, 79–82, 85, 91
analysis
, 85
growth of bibliometrics in business management and social sciences
, 80
indicators
, 89–91
methodology
, 85
reviews
, 43, 59, 62, 81–82, 84–85, 91, 94
software
, 87–88
tools and indicators
, 87–89
Bibliometrix
, 67–68
Biblioshiny
, 89
Business management
, 79–80
Chartered Association of Business Schools (CABS)
, 7
Citation Space (CiteSpace)
, 66
CiteNet Explorer
, 89
CiteSpace
, 89
CitNetExplorer
, 67
Classic review article, structure of
, 49
Cleanup functionalities
, 66–67
Co-occurrence analysis
, 63–64
Complex problems
, 142–143
Complexity
, 141
Conducting data synthesis
, 48
Consistency ratio (CR)
, 14
Convergent validity
, 10–12
Correlation analysis
, 2
COVID-19 pandemic
, 107–108
Criterion for conducting review
, 46–47
Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP)
, 150
Critical reasoning
, 114–115
Critical reviews
, 113
Cronbach’s alpha
, 10
Data analysis and interpretations
, 62
Data extraction
, 61, 150–151
bias
, 47–48
preparing for
, 47–48
Data screening
, 61–62
Data synthesis
, 151–153
empirical synthesis
, 151–152
theoretical synthesis
, 153
Databases
, 85–86
coverage
, 85–86
Delphi technique
, 12–13
Descriptive reviews
, 107–108
Domain-based review (see Framework-based review)
Drawing conclusions
, 155–156
EBSCO
, 46
Economics
, 79–80
Empirical synthesis
, 151–152
Excel
, 65
Exclusion criteria
, 130
Exploratory factor analysis (EFA)
, 9–12
assessment values
, 11–12
convergent validity
, 10–12
homogeneity and sampling adequacy
, 9
reliability analysis
, 10
Factor reduction techniques
, 12–13
Framework-based review
, 41–42
Future research areas (FRA)
, 7
Gephi
, 65, 88
Global weights for constituent items of power framework decision elements
, 18–19
Google Scholar
, 30, 46
Grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE)
, 112
Graphic User Interface (GUI)
, 127
Gray literature
, 46
High-quality literature reviews
, 103–104
HistCite
, 61–62, 64, 88
Homogeneity
, 9
Hybrid-narrative framework
, 42
Identification and assessment of studies
, 47
Impact factor (IF)
, 90–91
Inclusion criteria
, 130
Inexhaustiveness
, 58
Information technology
, 79–80
Integrated reviews
, 43–44
Integrative literature reviews
, 29
Interpretivism
, 138
Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin values (KMO values)
, 9
Knowledge
, 29, 139, 141
saturation
, 148
Leximancer
, 31–32
Literature review (LR)
, 2, 27–28, 32–33, 58–60, 104, 126–127, 138
author’s skills
, 114–116
frameworks
, 2–3
implications
, 119
methods
, 2
quality
, 117–118
significance
, 104–106
types
, 106, 114, 127–128
Literature search and identification
, 60–61
Litsearchr
, 67–68
Local weights power framework elements and constituent items
, 15–18
Logical positivism
, 138
Manual coding
, 31–32
Mapping reviews
, 113–114
Medical literature analysis and retrieval system online (MEDLINE)
, 111–112
Medicine
, 79–80
Meta synthesis
, 127–128
Meta-analysis
, 29, 58, 109–110
based review
, 42–43
literature review
, 127–128
Meta-synthesis
, 29
Metagear
, 67–68
Microsoft Academic
, 46
Microsoft Excel
, 65
Miller’s magic number
, 12–13
Mixed-method
, 2
mixed methods/hybrid review
, 114
Multicriteria decision-making (MCDM)
, 3, 13–14
Multinational enterprises (MNEs)
, 30–31
Narrative evidence synthesis
, 58
Narrative literature reviews
, 28–29, 127–128
Narrative review
, 106–107, 139, 141, 143–144
Narrative synthesis process
, 151
Need identification
, 46
NVivo
, 31–32
Pajek
, 65
Participants, interventions, comparators, and outcomes approach (PICO approach)
, 3
Performance analysis
, 90–91
Planning, operationalizing, writing, embedding/evaluating, reflection (POWER)
, 3
background and arguments
, 4–8
decision makers and publishers
, 21
future research agenda
, 21
implications
, 20–21
research methodology
, 9
respondent’s characteristics
, 10
respondents’ selection criteria
, 9
results
, 9–19
review on suggestions from editorials/notes
, 5–6
survey items
, 9
Planning for SLR
, 46–47
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA)
, 2–3, 128
extensions
, 133
guidelines
, 130–132
implications and future directions
, 130
PRISMA 2020 additions
, 132–133
PRISMA-A
, 133
PRISMA-E
, 133
PRISMA-P
, 3, 133
PRISMA-S
, 133
PRISMA-ScR
, 133
reproducibility in research
, 128–129
research methodology
, 130
results
, 130–133
Prior studies
, 59
ProQuest
, 46
Qualitative method
, 2
Qualitative systematic reviews
, 110–111
Quality assessment
, 61–62
Quality of literature review
, 117–118
Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses (QUOROM)
, 131–132
Quantitative method
, 2
R Core Team
, 67–68
R Foundation for Statistical Computing
, 67–68
R Software
, 67–68
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
, 134
Realism
, 141
Realist reviews
, 43
Realist synthesis
, 137–138, 141, 144
compared with review methods
, 138–141
conducting
, 144–145, 156
implications for policy and practice
, 156
limitations
, 156–157
with systematic and narrative review methods
, 140
Regression analysis
, 2
Reliability
, 117
analysis
, 10
Reporting findings
, 155–156
Reproducibility in research
, 128–129
Research questions (RQs)
, 81
Review
, 105
design
, 19
findings
, 48–49
methodologies
, 104
methods
, 21, 139
Review of literature (ROL)
, 126–127
Revtools
, 67–68
Rigor
, 117
Sampling adequacy
, 9
Science mapping
, 58
Science of Science tool (Sci2 tool)
, 67
Scientific mapping
, 91
SciMAT software tool
, 65–66, 72
Scoping
, 144, 146–147
literature reviews
, 29
reviews
, 43, 108–109
Scopus
, 7, 30, 46, 60
Searching
, 148
articles in databases using keywords
, 86–87
Selection
, 149–150
Sitkis
, 65
Snowball searching
, 148
Social sciences
, 79–80
Software tools
, 58–59
bibliometric reviews
, 59–62
challenges/limitations
, 68–72
conduct of bibliometric analysis
, 62–68
implications
, 73–75
lack of required technological skills of researchers
, 72
limitations and future research implications
, 74–75
limitations on access to publication databases
, 68
limited analytical and functional capabilities
, 68–72
practical implications
, 73–74
researcher insights
, 72
systematic review activities
, 63
Source-normalized impact per paper (SNIP)
, 90–91
SPSS
, 65
Structured literature reviews
, 59–60
Structured review
, 41
Subjectivity
, 58
Systematic literature review (SLR)
, 2, 28–29, 37–38, 58, 81–82, 109, 127–128
effective motivations for conducting
, 44–45
extracting and synthesizing data
, 47–48
future research agenda
, 45
general suggestions for writing
, 49–50
identification and assessment of studies
, 47
journals
, 39
papers
, 38
plan for writing
, 45–49
planning for
, 46–47
research questions
, 44–45
review findings
, 48–49
steps in conducting
, 30–32
traditional literature review
, 39–41
types
, 28–29, 41, 44
Systematic reviews (SR)
, 109, 134, 139
Systematically digitally encoding (SDE)
, 127
Team composition for writing SLR
, 49
Technological software tools
, 61
Technology
, 60–61
Technology-based review
bibliometric indicators
, 89–91
bibliometric review
, 81–82, 84–85, 91, 94
bibliometric tools and indicators
, 87–89
databases and database coverage
, 85–86
identifying studies for review
, 87
implications
, 96–97
research area and questions
, 83–84
sample size
, 84
searching articles in databases using keywords
, 86–87
Text analysis
, 2
Theoretical reviews
, 112–113
Theoretical synthesis
, 153
Theory, context, characteristics, and methodology (TCCM)
, 2–3, 41–42
Theory-based review
, 42
Thesaurus Editor
, 66–67
Traditional literature review
, 38–41
Types of reviews
, 41–44
UCINET network analysis software
, 65
Umbrella reviews
, 111–112
Validity
, 117
VantagePoint
, 62, 66–67
Visualization of Similarities (VoS)
, 43
Volume/quantity of articles
, 50
VOSviewer
, 62, 64–65, 88
Vote counting
, 111, 151
Web of Science (WoS)
, 7, 30, 60, 62–63, 79–80
Who, when, where, what, why, and how (6W)
, 2–3
Why, What, Who, When, Where, and How (5W1H)
, 39–40
Wicked problems
, 142–143
Writing for SLR
, 37–38
- Prelims
- Parameters and Decision Elements of Writing Effective Literature Review Papers: Empirical Evidence From Multiple Stakeholders on POWER Framework
- Systematic Literature Reviews: Steps and Practical Tips
- How to Plan and Write for Systematic Literature Review Papers in Management Domain
- Technology and the Conduct of Bibliometric Literature Reviews in Management: The Software Tools, Benefits, and Challenges
- What? Why? When? How? Where? of Technology-Based Bibliometric Review
- A Critical Review of Literature Review Methodologies
- PRISMA for Review of Management Literature – Method, Merits, and Limitations – An Academic Review
- Realist Synthesis: An Innovative Approach to Literature Review for Complex Management Phenomena
- Index