Index

Young, Gifted and Missing

ISBN: 978-1-80117-731-3, eISBN: 978-1-80117-730-6

ISSN: 1479-3644

Publication date: 17 August 2022

This content is currently only available as a PDF

Citation

(2022), "Index", Robins, A.G., Knibbs, L., Ingram, T.N., Weaver, M.N. and Hilton, A.A. (Ed.) Young, Gifted and Missing (Diversity in Higher Education, Vol. 25), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 189-194. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-364420220000025015

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022 Anthony G. Robins, Locksley Knibbs, Ted N. Ingram, Michael N. Weaver Jr. and Adriel A. Hilton. Published under exclusive licence by Emerald Publishing Limited


INDEX

Academic identity
, 166–167

Achievement gap
, 12

Acknowledging, knowing, understanding, valuing, and applying (AKUVA)
, 103

ACT prep program
, 29–30

Advanced Placement (AP)
, 91, 172

Affect
, 104

Affirmative Action
, 94

African American males. See also Black males
, 2, 54, 117, 183

academic achievement
, 92–93

critical factors for
, 54–55

participants
, 65

students
, 68–69

African Americans
, 67, 120–121

American Educational Research Association
, 90–91

American K-12 education system
, 164

American Psychological Association
, 90–91

Assessment Toward Motivation Mastering STEM (ATOMMS)
, 15–18

“Asset” based model
, 166–167

Authenticity
, 105

Barbershop computing
, 141

Between-school sorting
, 175

Bias and men
, 93

Black academics
, 160

Black boys
, 38, 100–101

findings
, 43–47

literature review
, 39–43

Black culture
, 185

Black girls
, 38

Black Lives Matter protests
, 79

Black males
, 25, 66, 100–101, 131, 164

data analyses
, 28

data collection
, 27–28

faculty
, 146–147

findings
, 29–32

funding
, 34

in high school
, 184

identity
, 166–167

literature review
, 24–26

participant selection
, 28

purpose and research question
, 24

race
, 175

recommendations for practice
, 33–34

research design
, 26–27

researchers’ positionalities
, 27

science and hip-hop for
, 102–103

selection criteria
, 27

Stanton Academy
, 27

in STEM classes and careers
, 131–132

students
, 24

teachers
, 119–123

Black philanthropy
, 74

advancement
, 81–82

advancement and black philanthropic behaviors
, 76–77

barriers black men face in attaining STEM degrees
, 77–79

utilizing philanthropy to promote STEM education
, 79–81

W. E. B. Du Bois’s Talented Tenth framework
, 74–76

Black poverty, inheritance of
, 89

Black professionals
, 130

Black Student Union (BSU)
, 3

Black students
, 131

Black tax
, 155–156

Black youth
, 101–102

Brain-based learning (BBL)
, 120

Bringing Attention to Transforming Teaching Learning and Engagement in Science (B. A. T. T. L. E. S.)
, 109

Career academy participation
, 25–26

Career and technical education (CTE)
, 184

Career readiness
, 30

Central City
, 41–43

Central City School District (CCSD)
, 41–42

Central Elementary
, 42

Children’s behavior, differences in
, 176

Coding
, 59

Cogenerative dialogues
, 106

College readiness
, 30, 93, 173

Communalism
, 104

Communities of practice (CoP)
, 56–57

Competition
, 107–108

Comprehensive mattering
, 49

COMPUGIRLS curriculum
, 137

Computer science (CS)
, 65, 131

Computing
, 137

Computing Research Association (CRA)
, 57–58

Computing sciences
, 66–67

Constant comparison analysis
, 28

Content
, 107

Context
, 107

Correlations
, 3–4

between grit and academic achievement scores
, 4–5

Corroboration
, 60

Cosmopolitanism
, 106–107

Coteaching
, 106

Counter-storytelling
, 43, 124

Course-taking patterns
, 172

Coursework
, 30–31

Credibility
, 60

Critical discourse analysis (CDA)
, 152

Critical race theory (CRT)
, 116, 123, 184

Cultural compatibility hypothesis
, 104–105

Cultural congruence
, 105

Cultural engagement
, 39

Cultural taxation (CT)
, 147

Cultural training pedagogy
, 122–123

Culturally responsive computing (CRC)
, 137, 185–186

Culturally sensitive pedagogy
, 104–105

Culturally sustaining pedagogy
, 104–105

Culture
, 123–124

classes
, 40–41

Curation
, 108

Davis’ Office of Development and Alumni Relations (DEVAR)
, 79

“Deficit” model
, 166–167

Dehumanization process
, 100–101

DIGITAL innovator
, 132

Digital Youth Divas program
, 137

Discourse analysis
, 152

Discovery Research Education for African American Men in STEM (DREAMS)
, 118

K-12 instruction
, 118

Distortions
, 60

Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)
, 79, 119

Diversity initiatives
, 146

Diversity talk
, 146–147

Diversity walk
, 146–147

“Do Now” Activity
, 116–117, 124

Donor engagement
, 82

Dual enrollment programs
, 172

E-textiles
, 137

Education
, 137

debt
, 120

Educational system
, 100–101

Educational Testing Services (ETS)
, 13

Edutopia
, 139–140

Elementary students
, 38–39

Employee engagement
, 146

Engineers
, 31–32

Entire employee experience (EEX)
, 159

Equity
, 116, 135

ethic framework
, 138–139

Eurocentric paradigm
, 100–101

Exceptional Children’s Program (EC Program)
, 168

Expressive individualism
, 104

Expulsions
, 174

Familial nurturing
, 63–64

Flickr
, 130

Full Option Science System (FOSS)
, 42

Gary Earl Grice
, 125

Gender
, 131

Google
, 130

Grade point average (GPA)
, 80

Green, Kevin
, 132–133

Grit
, 2

academic achievement scores
, 5–7

data analyses
, 3–4

limitations
, 7–8

methods
, 3

results
, 4–6

scores
, 3–4

Grittier individuals
, 2

Harmony
, 104

Health sciences
, 14–15

High schools
, 24, 131

Higher-level courses, limited access to
, 172–173

Hip-Hop

Cultural Competence
, 105

Scientists
, 125

Hip-hop development (HHD)
, 100, 103, 105

Historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs)
, 17–18, 33, 40–41, 94–95, 185

Homework gap
, 136

Human resources (HR)
, 146

Human resources management (HRM)
, 146

Hype-Fun-Learn
, 105

Identity
, 38–40

development
, 56, 167

Implicit bias of teachers
, 173–174

Indirect data-gathering methods
, 26–27

Institute of Education Sciences (IES)
, 17

Intergenerationality
, 105

International Baccalaureate (IB)
, 172

Intersectional theory (IT)
, 116

Interventions
, 13–14

educational
, 13–14

intervention
, 16

STEM
, 12

Interview protocol
, 58–59

“Invisible” labor
, 147

Item response differences by gender and race
, 148–152

K-12 education system
, 54

Lachney, Mike
, 133–134

Landmark theoretical model
, 104–105

Language impairments (LIs)
, 168

Layering programs
, 29–30, 184

Learning
, 123–124

Light Amplification by Stimulated Emissions of Radiation (LASER)
, 132

Male seasoning
, 100–101

Marginal mattering
, 49

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
, 125

Mathematics
, 120, 135

Media accountability
, 121

Medical science
, 14

Mentors
, 67–68

Minority serving institutions (MSIs)
, 95

Movement
, 104

Multifaceted mentorship
, 64–65

in computing
, 67

National Academy Foundation (NAF)
, 26–27

National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
, 136

National Center for the Advancement of Translational Sciences (NCATS)
, 14

National Council on Measurement in Education
, 90–91

National Institute of Health (NIH)
, 14

translational research framework
, 14, 17

National Science Foundation (NSF)
, 13, 183–184

National Science Teachers Association (NSTA)
, 170

Next Generation Science Standards
, 42

No Child Left Behind ACT of 2002
, 92

Nonexistent Adultism
, 105

Oklahoma State University (OSU)
, 82

Orality
, 104

Ordinary least squares regression
, 3–4

Parental nurturing
, 63–64, 66

Partial mattering
, 49

Perceptions of people or objects
, 121–122

Personal bias statements
, 132

Philanthropic investment
, 74, 76, 84

PK-20 contexts
, 118

Positionality
, 60

Positive identification
, 120

Positive peer interactions and modeling
, 61–63

Pre-K developmental screenings devoid of culture
, 168–169

Predominantly white institutions (PWI)

Predominantly white institutions (PWIs)
, 3, 15, 33, 55, 146, 183

Preschool programs
, 168, 174–175

Princeton Review
, 90

Principles of Psychology, The (James)
, 16

Private tutoring
, 136

Program for International Student Assessment (PISA)
, 134

Public school
, 100–101

Qualitative study
, 185–186

Race
, 131

Racial battle fatigue
, 147

Racial gap in school suspension
, 175–176

Ransaw, Theodore
, 132

“Ratchetdemic” educator
, 110–111

Reality pedagogy (RP)
, 100, 103

theory and practice 4 STEM connectedness and discovery among black males
, 105–110

Reliability
, 60

Research model
, 183–184

Retrieval
, 16–18

Role models
, 117, 121

Samuel Merritt University (SMU)
, 81

Nursing Workforce Diversity grant
, 81

Sanctuary city
, 41

Sandia National Laboratories
, 132

Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT)
, 91

School composition, changes in
, 175–176

School personnel
, 34

Science, mathematics, engineering, and technology (SMET)
, 134

Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)
, 2, 54, 100, 119, 123–124, 130, 146, 164, 183

barriers black men face in attaining STEM degrees
, 77–79

barriers to black males’ success in
, 167–174

career pathways
, 24–25

case for more intervention studies in STEM education research
, 12–19

college to STEM pipelines
, 118–126

contributions
, 186

conversation
, 164

curriculum
, 101–102

disciplines
, 2

drivers of school discipline and suspensions
, 174–176

early childhood experiences in
, 170–171

early childhood focus on
, 170–172

education
, 24, 164

fields
, 74

historical contributions of black males engaged in
, 165–166

identity
, 55, 65

lack of early exposure to STEM curriculum
, 169–170

learning
, 40

professions
, 39, 88

strategies to engage minority males in
, 176–177

utilizing philanthropy to promote STEM education
, 79–81

Science education
, 100–101

for black boys
, 39–41

Science Genius
, 108–110, 185

Self-concept
, 56, 65–66

Self-efficacy
, 65–66

Self-regulated learning
, 18

Self-regulation
, 18

Service
, 155–156

Short Grit Scale
, 3

Smartphones
, 139–140

Social action
, 125–126

Social Economic Status (SES)
, 134

Social emotional learning
, 18

Social equity
, 146–147

Social justice
, 125–126

Social science scholars
, 56

Social time perspective
, 104

Socialization process
, 62–63, 67

Sociocultural cognitive theory
, 103

Specific trait anxiety
, 88

Spirituality
, 104

St. Charles Aeronautics Team (SCAT)
, 132

Standardized tests
, 91

Stanton Academy
, 27, 29–31, 33

Stanton Engineering Academy
, 27

STEMfluences
, 55

CoP
, 56–57

data analysis
, 59

data collection
, 58–59

limitations and future research
, 69–70

participant selection
, 57–58

positionality
, 60

results
, 61–65

study design
, 57

validity
, 59–60

VSI
, 56

Stereotype threat (ST)
, 18

Storytelling
, 184

Students from underrepresented communities (SURC)
, 12

Suspensions
, 174–176

t-tests
, 3–4

Talent centered education leadership (TCEL)
, 157, 160, 186

item response differences by gender and race
, 148–152

method
, 147–148

qualitative results
, 152–160

results
, 148–160

“Talented Tenth” of race
, 74

Teacher education
, 39

Test anxiety
, 88, 90, 185

Test bias
, 90–91, 185

Testing, significance of
, 91–93

Testing effect. See Retrieval

Themes
, 59

Traditionally White institutions (TWIs)
, 94–95

Transformative teaching and engagement
, 103

Translational research
, 14

framework of National Institute of Health
, 14, 19

TRS-80
, 132

United Negro College Fund (UNCF)
, 118

US National Academy’s National Research Council
, 13

Validity
, 59–60

Verve
, 104

Viable social identity (VSI)
, 56

W.E.B. Du Bois’s Talented Tenth framework
, 74, 76, 185

Weekly Adrenaline Rush of Mastery experience (WARM experience)
, 19

Wells Fargo
, 130

White males
, 54

Zero-tolerance policies
, 175