Prelims
Reading Workplace Dynamics: A Post-Pandemic Professional Ethos in Public Libraries
ISBN: 978-1-83797-071-1, eISBN: 978-1-83797-070-4
ISSN: 0065-2830
Publication date: 1 August 2024
Citation
(2024), "Prelims", Irvin, V. and Mehra, B. (Ed.) Reading Workplace Dynamics: A Post-Pandemic Professional Ethos in Public Libraries (Advances in Librarianship, Vol. 55), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. i-xxx. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0065-283020240000055014
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2024 Vanessa Irvin and Bharat Mehra
Half Title Page
READING WORKPLACE DYNAMICS
Series page
ADVANCES IN LIBRARIANSHIP
Advances in Librarianship Editor
Bharat Mehra, The University of Alabama, Series Editor
Advances in Librarianship Editorial Board
Denise E. Agosto, Drexel University, USA
Wade Bishop, University of Tennessee Knoxville, USA
John Buschman, Seton Hall University, USA
Michelle Caswell, University of California Los Angeles, USA
Sandra Hughes-Hassell, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
Paul T. Jaeger, University of Maryland, USA
Don Latham, Florida State University, USA
Jerome Offord, Harvard University, USA
Title Page
ADVANCES IN LIBRARIANSHIP - VOLUME 55
READING WORKPLACE DYNAMICS: A POST-PANDEMIC PROFESSIONAL ETHOS IN PUBLIC LIBRARIES
EDITED BY
VANESSA IRVIN
East Carolina University, USA
AND
BHARAT MEHRA
The University of Alabama, USA
United Kingdom – North America – Japan – India – Malaysia – China
Copyright Page
Emerald Publishing Limited
Emerald Publishing, Floor 5, Northspring, 21-23 Wellington Street, Leeds LS1 4DL.
First edition 2024
Editorial matter and selection © 2024 Vanessa Irvin and Bharat Mehra.
Individual chapters © 2024 The authors.
Published under exclusive licence by Emerald Publishing Limited.
Reprints and permissions service
Contact: www.copyright.com
No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without either the prior written permission of the publisher or a licence permitting restricted copying issued in the UK by The Copyright Licensing Agency and in the USA by The Copyright Clearance Center. Any opinions expressed in the chapters are those of the authors. Whilst Emerald makes every effort to ensure the quality and accuracy of its content, Emerald makes no representation implied or otherwise, as to the chapters’ suitability and application and disclaims any warranties, express or implied, to their use.
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN: 978-1-83797-071-1 (Print)
ISBN: 978-1-83797-070-4 (Online)
ISBN: 978-1-83797-072-8 (Epub)
ISSN: 0065-2830 (Series)
Contents
List of Figures and Tables | vii |
Series Editor’s Introductioni | x |
About the Editors | xi |
About the Contributors | xiii |
Foreword | xix |
John M. Budd | |
Acknowledgments | xxix |
Introduction: The Symbiosis of Public Librarianship – Praxis and Ethos for a Post-Pandemic Identity | |
Vanessa Irvin and Bharat Mehra | 1 |
Section 1: Dynamics: Theoretical Lenses | |
Chapter 1: Public Libraries in Brazil: Conceptual Review in the Post-Pandemic Era | |
Daniele Achilles, Renata Oliveira, Deise Sabbag and Nanci Oddone | 13 |
Chapter 2: “Reading” The Room in the COVID-19 Era as Womanist Canonical Praxis: Black Motherhood and Public Librarianship | |
Shalonda Capers | 27 |
Chapter 3: Voices in the (Information)Wilderness: Black Feminism(s) and Informational Practices | |
LaVerne Gray, Joseph Winberry and Yiran Duan | 35 |
Chapter 4: “When They Go Low”: Preparing Information Professionals for Threats of Violence in Library Workplaces | |
Beth Patin | 51 |
Section 2: Practices: Operationalizing Protocols and Policies | |
Chapter 5: Commitment to Justice, Empathy, and Community During COVID-19: Results from a Three-Phase Study of Public Libraries | |
Denice Adkins, Jenny Bossaller, Ericka Butler, Wilson Castaño, Hyerim Cho and Joe Kohlburn | 63 |
Chapter 6: Equipping Librarians for Programming During and Post-Pandemic: A Turning Point for the Free Library of Philadelphia | |
Veronica Britto and Valerie Taylor-Samue | l77 |
Chapter 7: Exploring the Information Experiences of Immigrants Toward Public Libraries in New York City | |
Jean Rene | 91 |
Chapter 8: Blount County Public Library’s Response to COVID-19: A Library Director’s Pandemic Story | |
Kaurri C. Williams-Cockfield | 109 |
Section 3: Connections: Inside/Outside Library Partnerships | |
Chapter 9: Partnerships and the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Threat to Opportunity | |
Noah Lenstra, Nicole Peritore and Christine D’Arpa | 129 |
Chapter 10: Queer Reads and Resistance in Turbulent Times | |
Rae-Anne Montague | 147 |
Chapter 11: Weaving Resilience: The Pandemic’s Tapestry of Librarianship in New Mexico | |
Eli Guinnee and Kathleen Pickering | 163 |
Epilogue: Chasing the Long Tail of Covid: Envisioning a Renewed Ethos for Public Librarianship | |
Claudia Martinez | 183 |
Index | 189 |
List of Figures and Tables
Figures
Fig. 3.1. | The Culture-Centered Perspective of Information Practices. | 39 |
Fig. 3.2. | The Black Feminist Information Community Model/Elements (Adapted from Gray, 2020). | 42 |
Fig. 7.1. | Data Collection Procedure. | 96 |
Tables
Table 8.1. | BCPL Use Data Comparison Between FY 2017–2018 and FY 2018–2019. | 113 |
Table 8.2. | Daily Updates to the BCPL Library Board During Tier-3 Implementation – March 2020. | 118 |
Table 8.3. | BCPL Use Data Comparison from 2018–2019 to 2020–2021. | 123 |
Table 10.1. | Descriptions of Key Issues from Anti-LGBTQIA+ Bills as Reported by the ACLU. | 153 |
Table 11.1. | Demographics of Participant Library Locations. | 168 |
Table 11.2. | Themes from Survey Responses. | 170 |
Series Editor’s Introduction
I am delighted to take this opportunity and introduce myself as the Series Editor of Advances in Librarianship since January 2021. In this capacity, I am extending the series’ impact via integrating a critical perspective that spotlights social justice and inclusive praxis from the shadows to become an emerging canon at the very core of who we are and what we value as legit in library and information science (LIS) scholarship and practice. This strategic vision requires destabilizing of entrenched hegemonies within our privileged ranks and external communities to alleviate intersecting political, economic, social, and cultural anxieties and power imbalances we witness today. As we move toward the quarter-century mark, we also need to effectively document such paradigmatic shifts in LIS, serving as a foundation of inspiration upon which, together in our multiple identities and diversities, we can proudly contribute to the building of a meaningful society toward a brighter future for our children to inherit.
New stimulating models reimagining (or extending) the roles for cultural memory institutions (e.g., libraries, museums, archives, schools, etc.) and the field of information are much required to develop symbolic and real infrastructures for moving us forward. We also need to better tell our stories of information activism and community mobilization in the face of overwhelming challenges to human existence, from forces of neoliberal corporatization, political ransacking, media irresponsibility, climate change, environmental degradation, and pandemic dis/misinformation, to name a few. What do the contemporary threats of human extinction and cultural decay mean for LIS professionals, be it scholars, researchers, educators, practitioners, students, and others embedded in a variety of information settings? Not only does it require actions in the “doing” of resistance via information to decenter dysfunctional powerbrokers and their oppressions and entitled privileges. However, disseminating a forward-thinking agenda and narrative beyond our internally focused bastardized institutional bastions is equally important, as we adopt an active stance to promote fairness, justice, equity/equality, change agency, empowerment, community building, and community development.
Advances in Librarianship holds a special place in the hands, hearts, and minds of readers as a key platform to support creative ideas and practices that change and better articulate the vital contributions of libraries and the impact of information on diverse multicultural communities in a global network information society. Moving forward, my aim for the series is to engage our diverse professional communities in critical discourse that enable real transformations to occur. It is important to propel progress in shifting entrenched positionalities in LIS, while making visible content related to the “margins.” Decentering canons and practices toward equity of representation, inclusivity, and progressive change will naturally occur. Intersecting social, cultural, political, and economic upheavals in recent times demand an urgent response from the LIS professions in this regard.
I am truly honored and privileged to build on the legacy of Paul T. Jaeger, who served as Series Editor of Advances in Librarianship since 2013. His research helped to mobilize LIS in addressing concerns surrounding equity, diversity, and inclusion more substantially beyond past lip-service, also shaping the focus of the book series. I plan to operationalize new directions for single or multi-authored book-length explorations and edited collections by shifting focus on understudied spaces, invisible populations from the margins, and knowledge domains that have been under-researched or under-published in what we consider as high impactful venues in LIS and beyond. Examples might involve a reflective journey that established, or newly emerging LIS scholars, researchers, practitioners, and students critically reflect, assess, evaluate, and propose solutions or actions to change entrenched practices and systemic imbalanced inequities in different library and information-related settings. It might also involve decolonizing LIS publication industries in their biased Euro/Anglo-centricities with the inclusion of content from geographical diversities around the world.
I am reaching out to our multiple audiences for their support toward these goals in spreading the word for proposals to new volumes in the series. Let us find our “collective voice” in the LIS professions to make us all uncomfortable as we continue to “push the buttons,” thereby, becoming stronger in our quest to further social justice and develop our humanity, human dignity, respect, and potential to the fullest.
Bharat Mehra, PhD
Professor & EBSCO Endowed Chair in Social Justice
School of Library and Information Studies
University of Alabama, USA
About the Editors
Vanessa Irvin, MSLS, EdD, is an Associate Professor with the Master of Library Science Program in the College of Education at East Carolina University (USA). She received her Master’s in Library and Information Science from Pennsylvania Western University at Clarion and her Doctorate in Literacy Studies from the University of Pennsylvania. Dr Irvin’s primary areas of expertise include reference services, public librarianship, youth services, and librarian professional development. Irvin is particularly interested in studying the evolution of librarian professional practices under the influence of emerging technologies, having published actively and led multiple research projects in this area. Dr Irvin currently serves as Co-Editor-in-Chief of the open-access peer-reviewed journal, the International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion (IJIDI).
Bharat Mehra is EBSCO Endowed Chair in Social Justice and Professor in the School of Library and Information Studies at the University of Alabama. His research focuses on diversity and social justice in library and information science and community informatics or the use of information and communication technologies to empower minority and underserved populations to make meaningful changes in their everyday lives. He has applied action research to nurture a just society while collaborating with racial/ethnic groups, international diaspora, sexual minorities, rural communities, low-income families, small businesses, and others, to represent their experiences and perspectives in the design of culturally appropriate community-based information systems and services. Dr Mehra primarily teaches courses on social justice and inclusion advocacy, diversity and inclusive leadership in information organizations, community-engaged scholarship, outreach to diverse populations, public library management, collection management, and grant development for information professionals.
About the Contributors
Daniele Achilles is an Adjunct Professor in the Department of Librarianship, the Graduate Program in Social Memory, and the Professional Master’s Degree in Librarianship at the Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO). She is Leader of the Research Group Libraries, Memory, and Resistance, CNPq and Leader of the Community of Practice in Public Libraries Extension Program. Achilles received her Bachelor of Library Science – UNIRIO, Master’s and Doctorate in Social Memory – UNIRIO, and Sandwich Doctorate in Information Science at the Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Denice Adkins is Professor and Associate Director of the School of Information Science & Learning Technologies, University of Missouri, Co-editor of the Journal of Education for Library & Information Science, and Treasurer for REFORMA (The National Association to Promote Library & Information Services to Latinos and the Spanish-Speaking). Prior to her academic career, Dr Adkins was a public librarian serving diverse communities in the southwestern United States. Her additional past experiences include a Fulbright Scholarship to Honduras and a Fulbright Specialist to India, as well as serving as president of REFORMA, the executive board for ALISE, and councillor-at-large for the American Library Association.
Jenny Bossaller is an Associate Professor at the School of Information Science & Learning Technologies (SISLT) at the University of Missouri at Columbia (MU). Her teaching and research focus broadly encompasses public libraries, information policy, the history of libraries and information, and related social and technological phenomena. She has focused especially on the public’s access to information. She co-developed two IMLS education grants focusing on public library leadership and community and professional immersion (PuLL) another to revitalize the school’s health information and librarianship track (C4CH). She is the author of numerous articles related to libraries and health and is co-author of Introduction to Public Librarianship. She was the recipient of the 2022 ALISE/Connie Van Fleet Award for Research Excellence in Public Library Services to Adults.
Veronica Britto is Chief of the Adult Services and Programs Division at the Free Library of Philadelphia. She administrates programs that aim to increase Digital Inclusion, English Language Learning, Adult Basic Education, Business Education, Workforce Development, and Culinary Literacy in Philadelphia, PA. She also manages the Social Services and Engagement initiatives of the Free Library. In 2004, Veronica received a full scholarship from the US Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) to pursue her MSLS from Clarion University. She received her Undergraduate degree in Humanities and Communications from Pennsylvania State University and her Master’s in Library Science from Clarion University of PA. Veronica serves on the governing board of PhillyCAM, a Public-Access Media Center (Philadelphia, PA).
John M. Budd is a Professor Emeritus in the School of Information Science and Learning Technologies of the University of Missouri (USA). He has been active in library and information science (LIS) professional associations for over 30 years, chairing the American Library Association’s (ALA) Library Research Round Table, and serving as president of the Association for Library and Information Science Education (ALISE) and the LIS honor society, Beta Phi Mu. Budd has been on several committees with the Association of Information Science and Technology (ASIS&T) and has published over 100 articles in prominent LIS journals such as Library and Information Science Research, Journal of Documentation, and JASIST. Dr Budd’s publications also include several books, including Knowledge and Knowing in Library and Information Science: A Philosophical Framework (2001), Self-Examination: The Present and Future of Librarianship (2007), and The Library as Forum in the Social Media Age (2022).
Ericka Butler is a School Librarian and Recent Graduate from the University of Missouri Columbia with a Master’s Degree in Library and Information Science. She is an Advocate for reading, literacy, and sharing tips on reading with families. Ericka’s other interests include connecting families to mental health resources, sharing community resources, and helping communities understand the importance of self-care and literacy. Some of her past working experiences include being a Public Library Manager, Mental Health Librarian, and Lead After-school Teacher.
Shalonda Capers is a Womanist communication scholar and Doctoral candidate at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, Alabama. As a community-engaged scholar, Shalonda operationalizes her positionality as a Womanist boundary spanner, to create and disseminate scholarship that flows from community ←→ academy. By utilizing the four principles of womanism as both a theoretical framework and a methodology, Shalonda is presently engaged in intersectional and intergenerational research aimed at fostering coalitions both within and outside of academia, with a specific emphasis on advancing the discourse surrounding Black motherhood. Alongside her work as a Doctoral candidate, she is currently developing a peer-support model of care for mothers of children diagnosed with cancer through her organization, Golden Moms.
Wilson Castaño is an Associate Professor at the Interamerican School of Library and Information Science at the University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia. He works in the technology core for undergraduate students. Castano is pursuing his Doctoral degree in Information Science and Learning Technologies at the University of Missouri (USA). His research interests are information science technologies, digital reading, information literacy, and digital repositories. He received a Master of Digital Communication from the University of Antioquia, Colombia.
Hyerim Cho is an Assistant Professor at the University of Missouri iSchool. She received her PhD in Information Science at the University of Washington, Information School. Her primary research area is information needs and behavior, particularly of popular cultural multimedia information users such as video gamers, anime audiences, and webtoon readers. Some of Dr Cho’s recent research has been funded by the American Library Association (ALA), Reference & User Services Association (RUSA), and the Academy of Korean Studies.
Christine D’Arpa, MSLIS, PhD, is an Assistant Professor in the School of Information Sciences at Wayne State University in Detroit. Her research focuses on the history of libraries; the role of the federal government in information provision; and public libraries and community engagement. Her educational training includes an MS and PhD in Library & Information Science from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Yiran Duan is a PhD Student at Syracuse University’s School of Information Studies, USA. She holds an MA degree in Anthropology from Florida State University, USA. Her current research interests are at the intersection of social media influencers and social network analysis. Specifically, she is interested in exploring how influencers use hashtags in social movements.
LaVerne Gray is an Assistant Professor with the iSchool at Syracuse University (USA). Her research uses Critical Race and Black Feminist perspectives to explore information location and value in marginal community spaces. Dr Gray is keenly interested in African-American historical information collectives and archival-evidence analysis.
Eli Guinnee has been the State Librarian of New Mexico since 2018. He was formerly the Director of the Chautauqua-Cattaraugus Library System and Patterson Library in western New York. He is Chair of Education and Engagement for the New Mexico Department of Cultural Affairs. He is a Councilmember of the Connect New Mexico Broadband Council and serves as Chair of Digital Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility. His primary research area is rural libraries and the role of librarians in community systems.
Joe Kohlburn is a Doctoral candidate, Librarian, and Activist. Joe’s current research interests include activist media ecologies, news journalism, information use among self-identified activists, and communities of care for intra-institutional and organizational reform. Joe is also interested in video game and new media studies, and how games and media can impact user wellbeing. Joe works closely with intellectual freedom advocates and activists in Missouri and nationally. He is past chair of the Missouri Library Association’s Intellectual Freedom Committee, and currently still serves as a regular member. Joe advocates for the rights of readers, librarians, teachers, and parents to have access to a diverse collection of materials in their local libraries, and for the rights of historically marginalized communities to see their experiences and identities reflected in institutional and local collections.
Noah Lenstra, MLIS, PhD, is an Associate Professor of Library & Information Science and an Affiliated Faculty Member in the Gerontology program at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro, where he founded Let’s Move in Libraries in 2016. He has served as the Principal Investigator of multiple federal and state government programs focused on the diffusion of innovation of new models of public library work as community work, including HEAL (Healthy Eating and Active Living) at the Library via Co-Developed Programming and South Carolina Public Libraries & Health: Needs and Opportunities. He earned an MS and PhD in Library & Information Science from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Professional memberships include the Public Library Association and the Association for Rural and Small Libraries: Within the latter, he is a co-chair of the Association’s Partnerships Committee.
Claudia Martinez is a retired Public Librarian who devoted her career to the Free Library of Philadelphia from 1983 to 2012 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Claudia earned her Master’s in Library Science from Drexel University in 1990. She worked with the Free Library first as a page, then as a paraprofessional library assistant, then as a librarian, then as a branch manager, and then as a regional administrator. Martinez has served at all levels of public library service within an extensive municipal library system in an urban setting. Thus, Claudia comes with a wealth of professional knowledge, experience, and wisdom that helps us to appreciate public librarianship as a vital contributor to the healing of society post-COVID.
Rae-Anne Montague is an Associate Professor and Library and Information Science (LIS) Program Coordinator at Chicago State University. Dr Montague is a former teacher and school librarian who has written several articles on LGBTQIA+ library services in addition to coediting Queer Library Alliance (Litwin Books, 2017). She is past chair of the American Library Association (ALA) Rainbow Round Table (RRT); and a co-founder and former co-chair of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) LGBTQ+ Users Special Interest Group. Her scholarly interests include inquiry, learning communities, and social justice.
Nanci Oddone achieved full professorship in 2021 and is currently Head of the Department of Librarianship and Deputy Coordinator of the Graduate Program in Librarianship at the Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO). She received her PhD from the Graduate Program in Information Science at the Brazilian Institute for Information in Science and Technology (IBICT), in association with the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) in 2004. She was a Visiting Academic at Kent Law School, University of Kent, at Canterbury, UK, from 2008 to 2009. Her research interests include scholarly communication, open science and open access, books, and e-books.
Renata Oliveira is a Master’s student in the Graduate Program in Library Science (PPGB-UNIRIO). Member of the Libraries, Memory and Resistance Research Group. She is a teacher at the Rio de Janeiro State Department of Education (SEEDUC-RJ). Oliveira graduated in Library Science from the Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO) and graduated in Literature from the State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ).
Beth Patin is an Assistant Professor at Syracuse University’s School of Information Studies. Dr Beth’s research agenda focuses on the equity of information in two research streams: crisis informatics and cultural competence. She is the Co-founder of the Library Information Investigative Team research group. Currently, she is working on projects about epistemicide and the intersection of disability and race in youth literature. Additionally, she is a member of the Advisory Board of the Laura Bush Foundation for America’s Libraries.
Nicole Peritore, PhD, CHES®, is an Associate Professor in the Department of Community Health and Behavioral Sciences at Augusta University in Georgia (US). She is also the Program Director for the BS in Health Promotion program there. Dr Peritore teaches classes such as Introduction to Nutrition, Public and Community Health, Health Literacy and Health Promotion Program Planning, Design, and Evaluation. Her publications include work with creating health policies, promoting the importance of working with community partners, and exploring ways that communities can improve their health through food and physical activity opportunities. Peritore has worked to help organizations realize the significance of coalition building for sustaining successes brought upon communities through grant funding. Peritore’s current research is focused on community-based health, focusing on the evaluation and sustainment of programming.
Kathleen Pickering is the Director of the Belen Public Library and Harvey House Museum. She has a PhD in Cultural Anthropology from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and is Professor Emeritus at Colorado State University. Her teaching and research centered on indigenous self-determination and participatory community and economic development approaches.
Jean Rene is a community-focused librarian who believes in providing transformative services to the local community. He is responsible for Programming and Outreach at the Central Library, Queens Public Library. He is also an Adjunct Assistant Professor at York College, CUNY. Dr Rene is passionate about the role libraries play in enriching the lives of immigrant communities.
Deise Sabbag is a Professor at the University of São Paulo, Faculty of Philosophy, Sciences and Letters of Ribeirão Preto (USP) and the Postgraduate Program in Information Science at the Universidade Estadual Paulista – UNESP, Marília. She is a leader of the ECOAR Research Group – Contemporary Studies in Information Organization, Analysis, and Retrieval. Sabbag received her PhD in Information Science from UNESP – Marília.
Valerie Taylor-Samuel is the Assistant Chief of the Youth Services and Programs Division for the Free Library of Philadelphia. During her 20-year tenure with the Free Library, she has worked in various positions as a Librarian, but always with an interest in teen services and overall youth programming. She currently oversees the management of a number of the Free Library’s city-wide programs, including out-of-school time programs: the Literacy Enrichment Afterschool Program (LEAP), the Summer of Wonder summer learning program, Playful Learning Kits, Middle Grade programming, Teen Reading Lounge, and Read Baby Read. She serves on the Free Library’s One Book, One Philadelphia committee and co-chairs the Summer of Wonder learning program committees. Valerie received a BA in English from the Pennsylvania State University, and an MSLS from Clarion University, with an emphasis on Public Librarianship.
Kaurri C. Williams-Cockfield has 30+ years of progressively responsible work experience in both US and international library settings including public, academic, school, and corporate institutions. She holds both a BS in Library Science and an MLIS in Information Science from the University of Southern Mississippi. From 2003 to 2021, she served as a Public Library Director in Tennessee taking a two-year break to serve as the Director of Library Services for the Cayman Islands Government. She retired from public library service in 2021 and is currently an Adjunct Instructor for the School of Information Sciences at the University of Tennessee Knoxville where she teaches public library management and adult services (since 2011). In 2022, she taught collection management for the University of Alabama School of Information Science. She is currently a PhD Student at the University of Alabama. Her published research has focused on how public library programming impacts community social justice issues and how public libraries impact the development of sustainable communities.
Joseph Winberry is an Assistant Professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’s School of Information and Library Science. His research currently emphasizes critical library practice and impact, especially in relation to societal aging. Dr Winberry’s service activities include serving as the co-convener of the Association for Library and Information Science Education’s (ALISE) Historical Perspectives Special Interest Group and as the founding co-chair of the Aging Rainbow Coalition which is a new initiative which emerged from his dissertation to meet the aging services information needs of LGBT+ older adults in East Tennessee.
Foreword
John M. Budd, PhD
Reading Workplace Dynamics: A Post-Professional Ethos in Public Libraries is very timely, to say the least. All complex organizations, including libraries, are under considerable stress, with pandemic changes (some of which appear to be permanent), wage and price pressures, budgetary constraints, and personnel issues looming large. These matters are putting pressure on organizations to be responsive to changes on many fronts. The essays in this book address a number of pressures and changes in thoughtful and productive ways. This Foreword will not attempt to summarize the chapters but rather will form a kind of prelude, noting three particular challenges: the effects of the pandemic on libraries, managing the libraries – especially public libraries – in complicated times, and ethics for libraries as complex organizations. The three issues will be taken in turn and will, I hope, provide an entrée into the rest of the book. The chapters will deal with particulars; this Foreword is intended to approach the matter of the workplace in general terms. For one thing, we all must realize that the times are rife with matters demanding attention. As Howard Gardner and Shulman (2005) put it:
The hallmark of all professions, even beyond the prototypical practices of each, is the ubiquitous condition of uncertainty, novelty, and unpredictability that characterizes professional work. … This means that professional practice is frequently pursued at or beyond the margins of previously learned performances. (p. 15)
The present work, Reading Workplace Dynamics: A Post-pandemic Professional Ethos in Public Libraries, is an effort to address this challenging present and future.
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond
Early in 2020, the world changed. In many ways, the world shut down. When the COVID-19 outbreak was declared officially on March 13, 2020, most public libraries (as well as schools, academic, and special libraries) closed their doors because there could be no risks of spreading the disease by having extended and close contact among people. The closings were intended to protect staff and community members. Employees everywhere, including librarians, began working from home, providing people with as many services as possible. Pandemic restrictions were lifted officially in the United States on May 11, 2023, three years, two months, and two days after lockdown.
The effects of the pandemic were indeed global and severe. The very concept of public library services had to be altered to address the question: when people could not enter library buildings, how could services be continued? In many instances, there was initiated curbside delivery of books and other materials, with surgically masked librarians handing the materials to people who waited in their cars. E-books enjoyed a spike in purchase and circulation. Kimberly Shotick (2022) reports that some dynamics in public libraries remained the same, including the thinking and actions behind marketing library access and services. Communities had to be alerted as to which services would continue (albeit in a revised form), which would be curtailed, and which would be offered for the first time. Granted, some of the access and services have been ramped up considerably. For example, chat reference services, which had existed pre-pandemic, were enhanced and increased in many settings. Websites were expanded with detailed information to let the public know what they could expect from their libraries. Jon Goddard (2020) tells us that
During the COVID-19 pandemic, public libraries have demonstrated, in many ways, their value to their communities. They have enabled their patrons to not only resume their lives, but to help them learn and grow. Additionally, electronic resources offered to patrons through their library card have allowed people to be educated and entertained. (p. 1)
During what could have been an information services crisis on top of a public health crisis, public library leaders proved themselves to be remarkably agile in responding to a predicament, not of their making. They built upon some existing services, such as the provision of electronic resources that could be accessed from people’s homes. They developed new services to meet the needs of the public, such as employing Zoom® to reach people via virtual communications to conduct story times, feature speakers, teach tutorials, and many other services. Kanupriya Singh and Jenny Bossaller (2022) note, “The nature of teamwork also changed as libraries developed new workflows and staff roles to meet the demands of virtual services. Teams developed new methods for communication, creating virtual teams using new collaborative and communication technologies” (p. 513). Singh and Bossaller (2022) conclude that “[w]hether or not we see continued outbreaks that wreak such havoc soon, the pandemic has given us tools that increase agility in libraries. Librarians are now better prepared to instigate rapid changes, including in how teams operate” (p. 531). Many innovations developed during the pandemic persist since patrons have become accustomed to accessing services remotely from the physical library. At the outset of COVID-19,
libraries relied on their online offerings, so more e-books and other online resources were acquired. Staff learned that they could do quite a bit of their work from home. They could still respond to email and phone messages. They could evaluate and order new material. They could deliver online programs like summer reading and story time. They could interact with people on social media. They could put together key resources for patrons and post them on the website. (Ayre, 2020, p. 1)
Ayre (2020) also remarks that areas not served by broadband and digital technologies are “dark spots” when it comes to remote library services. These are decided inequities in the provision of library and other vital information services, especially in rural areas and small towns. However, librarians can and sometimes do, serve on state commissions and national boards, which determine how broadband services might expand to rural communities. By assisting in efforts aimed at expansion, librarians can help their institutions reach an even greater population. Again, these kinds of services can persist beyond the pandemic.
The number of librarians and staff working (at least some of the time) from home has remained much higher than in pre-pandemic times. WebJunction reports that:
While public libraries and their communities across North America continue to grapple with the challenges caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the collective strength of libraries continues to endure and grow. Public libraries have proven during these challenging times that they are essential community assets, and patrons and community members alike continue to hold up libraries as one of the most trusted institutions as they work together to overcome key challenges in the COVID-19 era. (Negron, 2022, para. 1)
Community members did tend to embrace many of the digital access and service mechanisms provided by public libraries, and many continue to turn to these mechanisms in post-pandemic times. It does appear that some of the changes wrought by COVID-19 are permanent alterations to the service imperative of libraries and are not likely to go away in the coming years. Indeed, the management of public libraries has become more complex with the sudden and profound changes the COVID-19 era has spawned.
Managing in Uncertain Times
Managing libraries, which are indeed complex organizations, is more difficult now, post-COVID, and it will only get more difficult in the future. Case in point, at the time of this writing, inflation has been unprecedented in the last few decades in the US and throughout the world. The inflation rate affects the materials and access that libraries seek to provide patrons. Unfortunately, many database providers’ pricing information is proprietary, so no figures can be given here. But readers who work in libraries can easily find out how much it costs to provide access to, for instance, EBSCO’s Academic Search Complete. A larger public library’s budget for databases is likely to run into seven figures. Fortunately, though, the price of a recreational book has remained more or less stable for the last number of years. However, the costs of printing a book have risen because of cost increases of paper, personnel, and equipment. Public library budgets have, by and large, not risen lately, so there is considerable pressure on libraries to provide a continuing stable of materials (books, magazines, and databases) to meet community needs. The pricing pressure is not a new phenomenon for libraries; prices have outstripped library budget increases for many years. This applies to all types of libraries and is not limited to public libraries.
Even in those libraries where there may be an adequate budget, societal pressures must be faced. In 2023, in the state of Missouri (USA), the House Budget Committee Chairman proposed cutting the entirety of the $4.5 million appropriation to public libraries in a dispute over an American Civil Liberties Union lawsuit challenging a new law that would ban materials deemed “sexually explicit” from schools and libraries. The state Senate later restored the funding, but only after active lobbying by many individuals, including librarians. Had the cuts been made permanent, the smaller libraries in the state would have felt the pinch much more than the urban libraries, which have larger tax bases. According to the American Library Association (ALA), the year 2022 saw 1,269 formal book challenges in libraries amongst 2,571 unique titles, indicating that book challenges often involved multiple titles. This surge of challenges doubled the number from 2021 and was the highest number of book challenges since the ALA began keeping data on this phenomenon at the turn of the 21st century (ALA, 2023).
Navigating the political nature of book challenges is an issue where librarians, particularly library directors, might lose their jobs. The current climate is such that almost any title in a library collection could be challenged. Even if a book portrays certain topics, such as sexual issues, in an unfavorable light, the text may be challenged. This is evident in the fact that Sherman Alexie’s The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-time Indian is among the most frequently challenged titles. Of course, most librarians ascribe to the principles of intellectual freedom; however, citizens may carry other ideals that motivate them to attempt to ban books. For example, in 2022, about 15% of book ban attempts originated from citizen-run library boards or administrations. Another six percent emanated from librarians or political officials, meaning that about one-fifth of the book challenges were more or less internal. Library leaders must, however, reluctantly address the challenges to materials to which they are presented, including addressing their biases to certain topics and issues.
ALA’s Office for Intellectual Freedom (OIF) further reports that 48% of book challenges occur in public libraries and 41% in school libraries (ALA OIF, 2023). In March of 2023, the Florida state legislature passed a bill that could result in a book being banned because of a single request due to sexual explicitness. “Sexual explicitness” is left vague in the law. These activities strike at the heart of intellectual freedom, which may be the foremost of the profession’s core values.
Several years ago, I formulated a set of reform issues intended to assist library leaders (at all levels) in dealing with the pressures under which they come. They are:
Engage in debate at prominent forums (including Public Library Association and American Library Association Conferences) on the purposes of the library, especially the goal of fostering democracy [with a small d]
Clear assertion of goals relating to community building through providing the apparatus for democratic participation
Development of policies that are aimed at achieving the goal of egalitarian access to mainstream and alternative sources of information
Creation and maintenance of library programming that puts egalitarian democratic policies into action
Building collections and access mechanisms that include mainstream and alternative sources of information. (Budd, 2007, p. 13)
I noted at the time that these matters might be controversial; they are no less controversial now. The public library may be the epitome of a liberal (with a small l) institution since the people fund it and is open to all residents of a community. As I wrote, “Liberalism, as it is used here, is not what is commonly thought of as part of the liberal-conservative dichotomy. Liberalism, in the classic sense, is a political and economic framework that privileges individuals’ autonomy, freedoms, rights, and self-determination” (2007, p. 4). So, one’s freedom to read something trumps someone else’s freedom to ban something. The prohibition of reading and access is not considered a freedom when it infringes upon another person’s freedom to access a book or other informational item. The management of the library organizations that seek to provide reading materials and information to all within the community is under pressure to meet the goals of the profession. The ideals just spoken of are at odds with what a minority of populations want to bring about. It is an open question of what the future will bring to library management.
Envisioning a Discursive Grace
With the world still recovering from the pandemic, library management and leadership can respond to the needs of the public by offering the library as the locus of conversations surrounding the most pressing concerns of our time. Public libraries have frequently been a destination where issues can be discussed. For centuries, they have served as community spaces devoted to presentations and debates on various viewpoints and topics.
In the public sphere, when people address one another face-to-face, they tend to be civil and respectful in their discourse. As Simon Blackburn (1984) says, the civility of discursive practices depends on the very nature of speech; “The speaker uses language. With it, he [sic.] can put himself into various relations with the world. He can describe it, or ask questions about it, issue commands to change it, put himself under obligation to act in various ways” (p. 3). Speech and language are at the heart of what libraries are; their existence is, in actuality, discursive.
Those who frequent libraries are engaged, in important ways, in speech acts, and in uses of language. In public discourse, citizens value expressiveness and articulateness. Can the same be said of non-library users? Can it be that those citizens who eschew reading are not prepared for conversations that explore viewpoints held by themselves and by others? Michael Polyani and Prosch (1975) assert that
[w]e might justifiably claim, therefore, that everything we know is full of meaning, is not absurd at all, although we can sometimes fail to grasp these meanings and fall into absurdities. … [M]eanings can be missed, since the emergence of life opens up the possibility of success but also, of course, the chance of failures. (p. 179)
When considering the library’s agency in communities within a post-COVID world, library managers need to be fully cognizant of the power of speech and discourse within the context of the library itself. In setting the library up as a public space for civil conversation, leaders should be willing to apply certain principles that surround discursive practice. Another thing that should be taken into account is that the conversations that take place within libraries among people with disparate viewpoints should have rationality as their basis. Jürgen Habermas (1988) emphasizes this point:
Well-grounded assertions and efficient actions are certainly a sign of rationality; we do characterize as rational speaking and acting subjects who, as far as it lies within their power, avoid errors in regard to facts and means-ends relations. (p. 15)
People can disagree, but their minds may also be changed through civil argumentation (in the strict sense of the word). I have maintained that “[t]hese are rigorous strictures that may not always exist in the course of communication among individuals. What they are constitutes the necessity for reasoned outcomes” (Budd, 2007, p. 99). Managers of libraries who are aware of the foregoing strictures are in a position to guide and provide ground rules for conversations that take place within library walls. They can take to heart another condition that Habermas speaks of:
Thus, the question “What should I do?” takes on a pragmatic, an ethical, or a moral meaning depending on how the problem is conceived. In each case, it is a matter of justifying choices among alternative available courses of action. But pragmatic tasks call for a different kind of action, and the corresponding question, a different kind of answer, from ethical and moral ones. (p. 8)
Managers realize that people are agents in the world who have the capacity to ask the above question and formulate pragmatic responses in a social milieu. Stephen White (1994) expands upon Habermas’s idea, saying,
Habermas’s conception of communicative action… implies a structure of intersubjectivity from which one can derive a mutual “speech-act-immanent obligation to provide justification” for the different sorts of claims which are continually raised in understanding-oriented action. This obligation is one which every actor has “implicitly recognized” simply by virtue of having engaged in communicative action. (p. 51)
The foregoing makes demands on library leaders and managers, but the potential outcomes are worth the effort to ensure that the discursive practices in which libraries are engaged result in some mutual understanding, perhaps, and agreement.
Meaningful consideration of changes in public discourse in libraries, as an outcome of COVID-19, allows me to reiterate something I said in the above-cited paper, “An ethical stance toward communities demands action on the part of professionals. The kind of action that can make a difference should be part of the consciousness of public library professionals and education for the profession” (2007, p. 2). That action should entail democratic deliberation by all involved in public libraries now that we are beyond the isolationist days of COVID.
Ethics for the Library Workplace
I have reserved what I believe to be the most important and essential issue when considering new workplace dynamics in public libraries post-COVID, for last: developing and maintaining an ethos for libraries, librarians, and service within the organization. Elsewhere I have written, “in this article, I address the practical (the ways we live as professionals in relation to our communities) and the normative (what standards for action we can agree upon and why)” (Budd, 2006, pp. 251–252). The same strictures apply here. The practical is provided, in part, through documents and policies put forth by the American Library Association. For the normative, we must turn to other writings and thoughts, sometimes articulated by philosophers.
For example, Shelly Kagan (1998) says that normative ethics “involves substantive proposals concerning how to act, how to live, or what kind of person to be. In particular, it attempts to state and defend the most basic principles governing these matters” (p. 2). Kagan’s view offers some guidance for exploring ethics in the library workplace; it presents a way to think about how the library as an organization, and how the people in it should behave and carry out the work of the library. I do want to emphasize the normative aspect here; there is a way in which the people in the organization ought to live and work. In turn, that normative element affects the communities where libraries live and how those communities “live” with the library. Standards of behavior provide both an ontological (in the sense of being and life) and an epistemological (in the sense of how we think about our existence) foundation for the people in libraries.
Kagan (1998) further states, “I think the best factor to consider first is this: the goodness of outcomes. This is a factor that I think virtually everyone recognizes as morally relevant” (p. 26). I agree with Kagan and aver that the missions and goals of public libraries stand as testaments to that principle. Furthermore, though, the strategies for achieving the missions and goals of libraries are extremely important. These factors recognize that outcomes depend upon collective action on the parts of librarians and staff. Thus, it is essential that librarians pay very close attention to the development and articulation of a mission and a set of goals and strategies. Mission statements are generally quite broad and encompassing. One example comes from the St. Louis County Library of the state of Missouri: “The mission of the St. Louis County Library District is to provide the resources and services to enrich individual minds, enhance lives, and expand perspectives” (St. Louis County Library, “About Us – Mission,” 2023). More specifically, the St. Louis County Library has formed a strategic plan, the elements of which are:
Promote Literacy and Support Lifelong Learning: We serve the community’s literacy needs from infancy to adulthood. We are the best resource for supporting lifelong learning and individual growth.
Foster a sense of Community, Inclusion, and Belonging: We seek to understand the needs of our community and provide opportunities to connect and enrich the lives of our patrons.
Increase Access, Impact, and Awareness: We strive to increase access to and awareness of the library’s resources and services (St. Louis County Library, “2023–2026 Strategic Plan,” 2023)
Beneath each strategy are specific tactics to be employed to achieve the strategies. The mission, strategies, and tactics form a set of outcomes to be accomplished.
A library’s mission, vision, and strategic plan act to form a connective engagement with the community, serving as a kind of integral contract with the constituency (individually and collectively). The strength of this bond is dependent upon a cooperative ethos between librarians and community members, a cooperation that is defined especially well by John Rawls (2001):
The central organizing idea of social cooperation has at least three essential features:
- (a)
Social cooperation is distinct from merely socially coordinated activity…. Rather, social cooperation is guided by publicly recognized rules and procedures that those cooperating accept as appropriate to regulate their conduct,
- (b)
The idea of cooperation includes the idea of fair terms of cooperation: these are terms each participant may reasonably accept, and should accept, provided that everyone else likewise accepts them,
- (c)
The idea of cooperation also includes the idea of each participant’s rational advantage or good. The idea of rational advantage specifies what it is that those engaged in cooperation are seeking to advance from the standpoint of their own good. (p. 6)
There can be an expansion of Rawls’s conception of cooperation and the notion of good, as expressed by Kagan (1998). Kagan says that “each of us should not only count everyone but should count everyone equally” (p. 42). From a conventional point of view, this understanding should apply to everyone within the library and with respect to the community members. Additionally, Kagan (1998) charges us with a question that should be asked by everyone in librarianship: “Is the morally relevant factor not only how good the outcome is for me, or is the morally relevant factor how good the outcome is overall, taking everyone’s well-being into account?” (p. 42). The answer to that question should be evident, particularly during these post-COVID times when humankind is recovering from a collective crisis.
Considering our profession’s ethos from a practice-based lens, the pertinent concern is how librarians and library staff ensure good outcomes for everyone within and without the library. It is here that professional statements come to the fore. For example, the profession’s core values should be considered and taken to heart in all aspects of the workplace. The values adopted by the Council of the American Library Association in 2019 are:
Access
Confidentiality/Privacy
Democracy
Diversity
Education and Lifelong Learning
Intellectual Freedom
The Public Good
Preservation
Professionalism
Service
Social Responsibility
Sustainability.
(ALA “Core Values of Librarianship,” 2019)
About 20 years ago, Thomas Weissinger (2003) assessed the practical efficacy of the values and concluded,
Do core values make a difference between orthodox and modified models of librarianship? The answer to this question is a qualified yes. With regards to reformed librarianship into an even more socially conscious profession, they make a difference. The profession is either more liberal or conservative depending upon whether its values are defined qualitatively or operationally. Qualitatively, there is a full range of possible values that can and perhaps should be linked to the profession…. When values are defined operationally, the profession’s range of possible values is severely limited by whatever counts as the core set. (p. 37)
It is unfortunate that some of these values are being called into question today and that, in some political circles, they are being refuted. A newly passed and signed law in the state of Florida would revise:
the duties of the Board of Governors relating to the mission of each state university; requiring the Board of Governors Accountability Plan to annually report certain research expenditures of a specified amount; prohibiting specified educational institutions from expending funds for certain purposes; revising how general education core courses are established; specifying a one-time limit on the requirement to change accrediting agencies, etc. (Florida Senate Bill 266, 2023)
A principle of the ALA Library Code of Ethics (2021) is the antithesis of the Florida law:
We affirm the inherent dignity and rights of every person. We work to recognize and dismantle systemic and individual biases; to confront inequity and oppression; to enhance diversity and inclusion; and to advance racial and social justice in our libraries, communities, profession, and associations through awareness, advocacy, education, collaboration, services, and allocation of resources and spaces.
It is up to all of us in librarianship to answer Kagan’s question in the affirmative and guard against all efforts opposed to the profession’s values and ethics. As I’ve posited and reiterate here to emphasize the timelessness of the point:
The derivation of a formal, consistent, agreed-upon practical and normative ethics is no mean feat. In actuality, librarianship has, in many ways over many years, aimed at this goal. The LBR, codes of ethics, expressions of core values, and other statements are tangible products of the effort. (Budd, 2006, p. 266)
Conclusion
The preceding hints at what is in store for the reader of the essays in this volume. Theoretical and practical issues will be discussed; matters of principle and fact will be addressed. Some of the foregoing will be elaborated upon, and the breadth and depth of the coverage of workplace topics will enlighten all readers. The authors are exceedingly well-qualified to delve into their respective chapters. This volume will greatly interest professional librarians and can be used in educational settings as readings in coursework for master’s programs. What has gone before in this Foreword is only a taste of what will come.
References
American Library Association (ALA) 2019American Library Association (ALA). (2019). Core values of librarianship. https://www.ala.org/advocacy/advocacy/intfreedom/corevalues
American Library Association (ALA) 2021American Library Association (ALA). (2021). Code of ethics. https://www.ala.org/tools/ethics
American Library Association (ALA) 2023American Library Association (ALA). (2023, March 22). American Library Association reports record number of demands to censor library books and materials in 2022. [Press release]. https://www.ala.org/news/press-releases/2023/03/record-book-bans-2022
Ayre 2020Ayre, L. (2020). What more can we do to address broadband inequity and digital poverty. Information Technology & Libraries, 39(3), 1–6.
Blackburn 1984Blackburn, S. (1984). Spreading the word: Groundings in the philosophy of language. Oxford University Press.
Budd 2006Budd, J. M. (2006). Toward a practical and normative ethics for librarianship. Library Quarterly, 76(3), 251–269.
Budd 2007Budd, J. M. (2007). Public library leaders and changing society. Public Library Quarterly, 26(3/4), 1–14.
Gardner, & Shulman 2005Gardner, H., & Shulman, L. S. (2005). The professions in America today. Daedalus, 134(3), 13–18.
Goddard 2020Goddard, J. (2020). Libraries respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, creating a new service model. Information Technology & Libraries, 39(4), 1–4.
Habermas 1988Habermas, H. (1988). The theory of communicative action: Volume one: Reason and the rationalization of society. [T. McCarthy (Trans.)]. Beacon Press.
Kagan 1998Kagan, S. (1998). Normative ethics. Westview Press.
Negron 2022Negron, P. (2022, July 5). Redefining Public Libraries in a Post-Pandemic World: Key Resources from Urban Libraries Council. WebJunction.org. https://www.webjunction.org/news/webjunction/redefining-public-libraries-key-resources-ulc.html
Office for Intellectual Freedom (OIF) 2023Office for Intellectual Freedom (OIF). (2023). Censorship by the numbers. American Library Association. https://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooks/by-the-numbers
Polyani, & Prosch 1975Polyani, M., & Prosch, H. (1975). Meaning. Northwestern University Press.
Rawls 2001Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Belknap Press.
Shotick 2022Shotick, K. (2022). Library marketing in the “post-COVID” era. ILA Reporter, 40(4), 8–11.
Singh, & Bossaller 2022Singh, K., & Bossaller, J. (2022). It’s just not the same: Virtual teamwork in public libraries. Journal of Library Administration, 62(4), 512–534.
St. Louis County (Missouri) Public Library 2023St. Louis County (Missouri) Public Library. (2023). 2023–2026 Strategic Plan. https://www.slcl.org/about-us/2023-2026-strategic-plan
St. Louis County (Missouri) Public Library 2023St. Louis County (Missouri) Public Library. (2023). About Us – Mission. https://www.slcl.org/about-us
The Florida Senate 2023The Florida Senate (2023). CS/CS/CS/SB 266: Higher Education. Senate Bill 266. https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2023/266
Weissinger 2003Weissinger, T. (2003). Competing models of librarianship: Do core values make a difference. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29(1), 32–39.
White 1994White, S. K. (1994). The recent work of Jürgen Habermas: Reason, justice, & modernity. Cambridge University Press.
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our profound gratitude to the reviewers of Reading Workplace Dynamics for their invaluable contributions to this work. These stellar scholars and practitioners of public librarianship generously offered their time, expertise, and insightful feedback, significantly improving the book’s quality and depth.
We conducted the review process with a unique approach, allowing reviewers to choose whether they wished to remain anonymous. This coming-from-behind-the-curtains act of agency reflects our commitment to fostering open discourse and collective identity within public librarianship.
We are particularly grateful to the reviewers who chose to be named for their contributions:
Dr Renate Chancellor, Syracuse University
Dr Mónica Colón-Aguirre, University of South Carolina
Dr Anne Goulding, Te Herenga Waka – Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
Dr Africa Hands, University of Buffalo, New York
Dr Kafi Kumasi, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
Dr Brady Lund, University of North Texas
Dr Ajit Pyati, University of Western Ontario, Canada
Dr Rita Soulen, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.
We also extend our heartfelt appreciation to the reviewers who chose to remain anonymous. Your unwavering support and willingness to share your expertise played a vital role in bringing this book to fruition. We respect your agency and deeply value your contributions.
We express our sincere gratitude to all of our reviewers for your time, dedication, and insightful feedback. Your invaluable contributions have helped to make Reading Workplace Dynamics a valuable resource for scholars and practitioners of public librarianship alike.
We’d also like to express our gratitude to the editors at Emerald Publishing, who were incredibly patient, graceful, and understanding during the entire publication process for this book.
And, finally, to our amazing, individually unique, and collectively powerful voices of contributors who have made this collection such a meaningful and valuable body of work. We truly appreciate the passion, spirit, and dedication of our authors and their faith in the impact of public libraries, especially during times of crisis. Only because of your vision and belief in the power of good that public agencies (like public libraries) can generate were we as editors provided with a golden opportunity and privilege to bring you all together and serve as editors of your scholarship, thereby leading to the creation of this timely and important volume.
- Prelims
- Introduction: The Symbiosis of Public Librarianship – Praxis and Ethos for a Post-Pandemic Identity
- Section 1: Dynamics: Theoretical Lenses
- Chapter 1: Public Libraries in Brazil: Conceptual Review in The Post-Pandemic Era
- Chapter 2: “Reading” The Room in The COVID-19 Era as Womanist Canonical Praxis: Black Motherhood and Public Librarianship
- Chapter 3: Voices in The (Information)Wilderness: Black Feminism(s) and Informational Practices
- Chapter 4: “When They Go Low”: Preparing Information Professionals for Threats of Violence in Library Workplaces
- Section 2: Practices: Operationalizing Protocols and Policies
- Chapter 5: Commitment to Justice, Empathy, and Community During COVID-19: Results from a Three-Phase Study of Public Libraries
- Chapter 6: Equipping Librarians for Programming During and Post-Pandemic: A Turning Point for The Free Library of Philadelphia
- Chapter 7: Exploring The Information Experiences of Immigrants Toward Public Libraries in New York City
- Chapter 8: Blount County Public Library's Response to COVID-19: A Library Director's Pandemic Story
- Section 3: Connections: Inside/Outside Library Partnerships
- Chapter 9: Partnerships and the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Threat to Opportunity
- Chapter 10: Queer Reads and Resistance in Turbulent Times
- Chapter 11: Weaving Resilience: The Pandemic's Tapestry of Librarianship in New Mexico
- Epilogue: Chasing The Long Tail of Covid: Envisioning a Renewed Ethos for Public Librarianship
- Index