To read this content please select one of the options below:

Towards a more dynamic stakeholder model: acknowledging multiple issue arenas

Vilma Luoma‐aho (Department of Communication, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland)
Marita Vos (Department of Communication, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland)

Corporate Communications: An International Journal

ISSN: 1356-3289

Article publication date: 10 August 2010

8198

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to suggest that corporate communications is becoming less predictable as interaction with stakeholders is moving from organizational control toward “issue arenas”, places of interaction where an issue is discussed by stakeholders and organizations both online and within the traditional media. The role of corporate communications and public relations (PR) is broadening beyond the traditional relationship management to issue arena monitoring.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper takes a theoretical approach with six axioms suggested.

Findings

Several central theories of corporate communications are combined with issues management and stakeholder theory to argue for a multiplicity of new “issue arenas”, which require an increased amount of monitoring. Six axioms are suggested for future research on corporate communications, and a mosaic of multiple strategies for multiple publics moved by multiple issues is recommended.

Research limitations/implications

The axioms suggested require empirical testing with different arenas across contexts and cultures, and the axioms may change over time as the virtual arenas expand. Future studies should focus on the process of arena formation as well as the division of voice on the arenas.

Practical implications

Monitoring becomes central as corporate communication is less controllable. Corporate communication and PR will play a key role in organizational survival in the future through the processes of finding the right issues and “issue arenas” for interaction, facilitating the organization‐public debate and through this managing organizational reputation. A change in thinking is required, as identifying issues should precede identifying stakeholders.

Originality/value

The paper argues that organizational survival depends not only on communicating with the right stakeholders, but also on finding the relevant issue arenas in which organizations should participate in discussion.

Keywords

Citation

Luoma‐aho, V. and Vos, M. (2010), "Towards a more dynamic stakeholder model: acknowledging multiple issue arenas", Corporate Communications: An International Journal, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 315-331. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563281011068159

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2010, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles