Search results

Reports on research to determine the degree of application of total quality management (TQM) philosophy and practices in industrial corporations in Jordan. Uses primary and secondary empirical data to examine the link between TQM and labour productivity. Survey responses were classified into two groups: high‐TQM implementation and low‐TQM implementation. Found that mean labour productivity measurements for high‐TQM companies were significantly higher than for low‐TQM companies over the period 1993‐1998. Also, mean growth rates of labour productivity measurements for companies with high‐level TQM were higher than for those with low‐level TQM during this period. Regression analysis demonstrated a statistically significant positive relationship between TQM and labour productivity.

This paper discusses results from an international study of continuous improvement in product innovation. The empirical research is based upon a theoretical model of continuous product innovation (CPI) that identifies contingencies, behaviours, levers and performances relevant to improving product innovation processes. As successful knowledge management is widely recognised as a key capability for firms to successfully develop CPI, companies have been classified according to identified contingencies and the impact of these contingencies on key knowledge management criteria. Comparative analysis of the identified groups of companies has demonstrated important differences between the learning behaviours found present in the two groups thus identified, and in the levers used to develop and support these behaviours. The selection of performance measures by the two groups has highlighted further significant differences in the way the two groups understand and measure their CPI processes. Finally, the paper includes a discussion of appropriate mechanisms for firms with similar contingency sets to improve their approaches to organisational learning and product innovation.

As a learning theory, the continuous improvement (CI) discourse has benefited countless manufacturing enterprises to improve and adapt their methods of production. As one of the pillars of total quality management, it has generally included a range of dynamic concepts from high involvement teamwork and production enablers, to other social and technical capabilities such as innovation techniques. Such methodologies have been promoted in the literature as potential manifestos that can transform existing capabilities from simple representations of capability, to dynamically integrated ones (often labelled “full CI capacity”). The latter term in particular deserves more attention in the literature. Since CI techniques cannot be separated from organisational learning methodologies, it follows that CI methods should underpin holistic learning. This paper explores whether CI methodologies have advanced far enough to be considered as integrated and holistic in their own right. If not, it follows that new theories, challenges and discourses should be considered for exploration in the CI literature.

Service industries hold an increasingly dynamic and pivotal role in today’s knowledge‐based economies. The logistics industry is a classic example of the birth and development of a vital new service‐based industry, transformed from the business concept of transportation to that of serving the entire logistical needs of customers. Quantum advances in science, technology, and communication in the new millennium have compelled firms to consider the potential of the so‐called new “resources” (technology, knowledge and relationship networks) that are essential if firms are to operate effectively within the emerging business model, and to utilise the opportunities to innovate and gain market leadership. Through an extensive literature review, this paper examines the factors that nurture innovation in logistics services, identifies the contributions of the new “resources” and, using industry examples, examines the application of these resources to logistics firms as they assume an extended role within the new business model.

The implementation of Total Quality Management (TQM) principles and practices in continuous‐process manufacturing operations is described from initial consideration through to TQM becoming part of the normal operations of the company. The importance of management‐led project teams in the early phases of implementation and the subsequent shift to operator‐initiated and ‐controlled quality improvements is detailed. Accreditation to international quality system standards (ISO 9002) and the interaction of such accreditation with the cultural change required for successful TQM implementation is discussed. Problems confronting effective TQM implementation or quality‐system accreditation are discussed such as: relationships between the multinational parent company and the domestic subsidiary, and the geographical separation of sections of the company between head offices and manufacturing site. A detailed examination is made of the organisational structure utilised to develop a TQM culture within the company, and the dynamic nature of such an organisational structure in the early phases of implementation is observed. The major requirement for increasing employee involvement in quality‐improvement activities is found to be an increasing commitment to employee training in the areas of: TQM principles; statistical tools; group problem‐solving skills; and leadership skills.

Asserts that, in order to implement TQM effectively, quality is something that needs to be valued by everyone. Examines a number of key issues to be considered before embarking on a TQM programme and discusses the implementation of TQM. Outlines the basic elements to guide the programme. Concludes that the secret of achieving a successful implementation programme lies in the commitment of the senior members of a firm to the process, and in the successful training, development and recognition of the staff. The objective of the TQM programme is for the good practices to become instinctive.

While Australian firms have generally recognised the value of continuous improvement (CI) in improving performance, many have yet to develop systems to ensure that the efforts of the CI program are focussed on issues of strategic importance to the company. In fact, as recognised in operations management generally, CI activities can have a significant impact on the development of strategy as well as its implementation. The research reported here uses a CI mapping methodology to chart the relationship between CI and strategy in small‐ to medium‐sized manufacturers. Analysis of the link between the firms’ strategies and CI programs indicates that most firms involved in the study made little attempt to link the two and some appear to be unaware of any need to do so. However, such findings seem to be dependent on company size, the maturity of the CI program and the competitive position of the firm. The paper also includes an examination of the role of operations and shopfloor CI in company strategy, particularly as related to SMEs.

Notes that Australian businesses are continually being expected to respond to changes in the economy brought about by alterations to government policies. Suggests that those industries which survive and flourish will need to have in place a process for responding to change. Points out that continuous improvement (CI) was identified in a recent Australia/New Zealand manufacturing survey as the most important manufacturing enhancement process currently available. In 1997, an Australia‐wide study of CI in manufacturing was initiated by a benchmarking survey examining the CI activities of medium to large manufacturing firms. Reports on selected findings of the survey and presents an analysis by industry sector of the firms’ main motives for CI, content in the CI process, support for CI and problem‐solving tools used to support CI. Initial findings indicate that there are no significant differences between manufacturing organizations in different Australian states. However, significant differences were found on comparing different industry sectors.

An Australia‐wide study of continuous improvement (CI) in manufacturing was initiated in 1996/97 by conducting a benchmarking survey examining the CI activities of medium to large manufacturing firms. While most larger firms have an awareness of CI and many are actively implementing CI throughout their organisations, anecdotal evidence suggests that considerably less activity is occurring in the small‐to‐medium enterprise (SME) sector. Given the significant contribution of the SME sector to Australia’s GDP and international competitiveness, and the importance of CI to all firms regardless of size or industry, a sample of small‐ to medium‐size firms in New South Wales were surveyed about their CI activities. This paper reports on a comparative analysis of the findings of these two surveys and examines the firms’ main motives for CI, content in the CI process, support for CI, the usage of problem‐solving tools within CI process, and their general maturity level of CI. The comparison suggests that many motives for CI and the general content of the CI process are quite similar for both large and small firms. However, significant differences occur between the two when comparing CI support methods, and the use of problem‐solving tools within the CI process.

Performance measurement systems not only provide the data necessary for managers to control business activity, they also influence the behavior and decisions of managers. This being the case, a restrictive set of financial performance measures may adversely impact on an organization’s long‐term viability, so organizations should develop a broad range of performance measures. Berliner and Brimson state that “performance measurement is a key factor in ensuring the successful implementation of a company’s strategy”. Thus when organizations implement new strategies they should ensure that the appropriate set of performance measures are in place. In this paper we look at two case studies conducted in a medium‐sized manufacturing firm and a large manufacturing firm, and evaluate the managers’ perceptions of the strategy/performance measurement relationship, and the responsiveness of performance measures to changes in strategy.