Search results

Soon after the first regularly published newsstand comic book went on sale in 1934, and especially by 1938 with the arrival of Superman in Action Comics #1, comic books were established as a distinctly separate entertainment medium from newspaper comic strips. To boost circulation, some titles introduced liberal amounts of sex and gore, and this caught the eye of parents, teachers, and librarians. Comic books were widely disapproved of for many years, and any library actively collecting them would have had angry parents to deal with. Possibly as a result of this general disapproval, New Serial Titles excluded comic books by policy from the beginning, a policy not reversed until 1979. In addition, the Library of Congress has never provided cataloging for comic books, which may have discouraged librarians from keeping what they had acquired. To make a sad story even longer, comic‐book distribution was almost entirely on the newsstand and not through subscription nor the book‐trade channels that librarians normally use.

Comic books, especially if printed in black and white, are a relatively cheap communication and entertainment medium. This means that poor people (including kids) can afford them, and also that small publishers (including kids) can afford to produce them. It thus seems natural that there have always been “alternatives” to the comics published by the big companies with their color printing and Madison Avenue artwork.

Aarhus Kommunes Biblioteker (Teknisk Bibliotek), Ingerslevs Plads 7, Aarhus, Denmark. Representative: V. NEDERGAARD PEDERSEN (Librarian).

Communications regarding this column should be addressed to Mrs. Cheney, Peabody Library School, Nashville, Term. 37203. Mrs. Cheney does not sell the books listed here. They are available through normal trade sources. Mrs. Cheney, being a member of the editorial board of Pierian Press, will not review Pierian Press reference books in this column. Descriptions of Pierian Press reference books will be included elsewhere in this publication.

It has often been said that a great part of the strength of Aslib lies in the fact that it brings together those whose experience has been gained in many widely differing fields but who have a common interest in the means by which information may be collected and disseminated to the greatest advantage. Lists of its members have, therefore, a more than ordinary value since they present, in miniature, a cross‐section of institutions and individuals who share this special interest.

[Preface to] Redeeming the time. A sermon preached at the service for members of the University of London in Westminster Abbey on May 10th, 1916, by His Grace the Lord Archbishop of Canterbury [Randall Thomas Davidson]. London, Faith Press, 1916. pp. 3–4.

In this chapter organizational theory is used to clarify and synthesize the large and diverse literature on the relationship between managed care (MC) and ethnic differences in access to health services. MC practices are classified by whether they are used by health care organizations to define their boundaries or to coordinate care. MC practices used to coordinate care are further categorized as one of five types: rules and programs, authority, goal setting, culture, or client coordination. This review also presents hypotheses derived from this literature that specify the predicted effects of MC practices on ethnic differences in access to health services. It was found that few of these hypotheses had been empirically investigated and although some evidence was found that MC boundary-setting practices disadvantage minorities, there were not consistent findings with respect to those practices used to coordinate care.

The authors explore self-identity construction as a mechanism of institution­aliz­ation at the individual level. Building on in-depth analysis of life stories of yoga practitioners who are at different stages of practice, the authors found that as yoga practitioners are more exposed to the yogic institution, yogic meanings gradually infuse their general worldview and self-concept. The authors follow the line of research which focuses on professional identity construction as institutional work, yet, opening the “black box,” the authors argue that institutional meanings take root at the individual level beyond the institutional context and beneath the explicit level of identity.