To read this content please select one of the options below:

U.S. minorities’ access to health care under managed care: A synthesis of the literature

Inequalities and Disparities in Health Care and Health: Concerns of Patients, Providers and Insurers

ISBN: 978-0-7623-1474-4, eISBN: 978-1-84950-556-7

Publication date: 12 December 2007

Abstract

In this chapter organizational theory is used to clarify and synthesize the large and diverse literature on the relationship between managed care (MC) and ethnic differences in access to health services. MC practices are classified by whether they are used by health care organizations to define their boundaries or to coordinate care. MC practices used to coordinate care are further categorized as one of five types: rules and programs, authority, goal setting, culture, or client coordination. This review also presents hypotheses derived from this literature that specify the predicted effects of MC practices on ethnic differences in access to health services. It was found that few of these hypotheses had been empirically investigated and although some evidence was found that MC boundary-setting practices disadvantage minorities, there were not consistent findings with respect to those practices used to coordinate care.

Citation

Greenberg, G.A. (2007), "U.S. minorities’ access to health care under managed care: A synthesis of the literature", Jacobs Kronenfeld, J. (Ed.) Inequalities and Disparities in Health Care and Health: Concerns of Patients, Providers and Insurers (Research in the Sociology of Health Care, Vol. 25), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 45-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0275-4959(07)00003-8

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2007, Emerald Group Publishing Limited