Search results

Universities in the United Kingdom, like their counterparts globally, are confronting difficulties associated with the well-being of students. The origins of these challenges are complex, exacerbated by various global events. In response, universities are trying to address these growing concerns and the escalating need for student support. Faculty members are often recruited to assist students in navigating academic and personal challenges. The aim of this study was to investigate how the process of student mentoring, by faculty members, could be made more operationally robust to better support student demand, thus yielding greater value for both students and staff.

A qualitative approach was adopted with 19 academic faculty working as mentors within a UK business school who participated in 90-minute semi-structured interviews. Interviews were analysed using an operational (transformation) management framework, with findings categorised under three key headings – inputs, transformations and outputs – to discover how the operational process of mentoring students could be enhanced.

Participants discussed the inputs required to deliver mentoring, the process of transformation and their desired outputs. Findings suggest coordinated and relevant inputs that is, information, environments and technology, coupled with good mentor selection and recruitment improves operational robustness, adding greater value to the student experience by creating more purposeful outputs, thereby benefiting themselves and their students.

The application of an operational (transformation) process framework to analyse faculty mentoring of students is unique, thereby offering new insights into the construction and management of these types of academic support initiatives.

Despite extensive psychometric research on psychosocial assessment tools, comparatively little explores the practical application and evaluation of these tools for prioritising workplace psychosocial risks. This paper addresses this gap by illustrating the use of one popular, freely available measure in an applied risk assessment context, alongside qualitative data, highlighting questions and challenges for organisations.

1,425 employees from a UK public-sector organisation completed the Management Standards Indicator Tool (MSIT), General Health Questionnaire, and open-text questions about stress-related and positive aspects of work. Three approaches to analysing MSIT data were adopted: descriptive statistics, multiple regression and risk calculation, complemented by analysis of open-text qualitative data.

Demands and change were ranked prominently by each method; however, there were major inconsistencies, for example, relationships ranked first using one method but sixth by another. Qualitative comments broadly reflected quantitative analyses, with demands mentioned most frequently, but highlighted issues and nuances not covered by the MSIT.

Only a selection of potential approaches to analysis is considered here, future research to support employers with analysis and evaluation of quantitative risk assessment data would be valuable.

Risk-assessors’ choice of analysis could have major implications for where employers direct resources, supporting existing guidance to avoid sole reliance on quantitative surveys for risk assessment.

This paper builds on the necessary–but not sufficient–psychometric foundations of risk assessment tools, integrating qualitative data and illustrating questions and challenges in applying them for their stated purpose.

The purpose of this study is to present a mini-integrated review on upcycling as a marketing strategy used by brands in promoting sustainability. Upcycling has emerged as a promising strategy for sustainability in the fashion industry. Activities within the industry have resulted in the release of toxic chemicals, carbon emissions and unsustainable products with significant environmental impacts. This has influenced manufacturers and researchers to adopt alternative but sustainable approaches.

In this mini-integrated review, relevant documents and information were sourced from appropriate databases and websites to provide a brief insight into upcycling as a marketing tool.

This mini-integrated review further provides insight into how effective upcycling can be integrated into a brand’s marketing strategy as a tool to communicate its commitment to sustainability and the production of high-value products for consumer satisfaction. It concludes that the fashion industry has a significant impact on the environment, and the practice of upcycling has surfaced as a potential solution to address issues of sustainability paving the way for further studies.

Brands use upcycling to differentiate themselves from competitors and appeal to consumers who prioritize sustainability. By emphasizing the environmental benefits of upcycling, brands can position themselves as leaders in the domain of sustainable fashion practices.