Search results
1 – 10 of 624Kenneth R. Lord, Sanjay Putrevu and Elizabeth A. Olson
This study aims to enhance the understanding of impulse buying in grocery stores, where such purchases are pervasive and consumers face greater decision fatigue and diminished…
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to enhance the understanding of impulse buying in grocery stores, where such purchases are pervasive and consumers face greater decision fatigue and diminished willpower than in more frequently examined retail environments. The intent is to demonstrate the influence of variables known to affect impulse buying in other environments on grocery shopping behavior, identify and profile segments that vary along those constructs and reveal how those segment characteristics help to explain impulse buying differences.
Design/methodology/approach
A purposive sample of 234 grocery shoppers approached at the point of purchase in a metropolitan area in Northeastern USA completed scales for theoretically derived variables and reported on their impulse purchases.
Findings
Anxiety, perceived financial pressure (PFP), novelty/variety seeking and shopping enjoyment positively influenced, whereas need for cognition had a negative effect on impulse-purchase activity. Two distinct segments of impulse buyers emerged: anxious and innovative shoppers. Anxious shoppers were higher in anxiety, PFP and compulsive buying, whereas innovative shoppers had higher levels of need for cognition and novelty/variety seeking.
Originality/value
The evidence for the dominance of anxiety and novelty/variety seeking as key motivators of distinct segments of impulse buyers in grocery stores is unique to this study. Results yield new insight on tension between the effects of motivational variables on the immediate impulse buying decision and post-purchase evaluation and add precision to marketers’ efforts to encourage spontaneous in-store decision-making.
Details
Keywords
Kenneth R. Lord and Pola B. Gupta
The purpose of this paper is to review product‐placement research in the consumer‐marketing domain, examine the acceptability of the practice for buying‐center participants, and…
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to review product‐placement research in the consumer‐marketing domain, examine the acceptability of the practice for buying‐center participants, and assess recall, attitude and purchase‐intention responses to B2B products placed in movie scenes.
Design/methodology/approach
Achievement of the research objectives requires the collection of data from a sample of organizational buying‐center participants and their exposure to B2B placements in entertainment‐media contexts. Qualified participants observed a movie containing B2B products within the context of the feature. They then completed a short questionnaire concerning their observations and the impressions gained from that observation.
Findings
Product placements, used prolifically to target household consumers, are beginning to expand into the B2B domain. This research reviews product‐placement research in the B2C domain and examines the acceptability of the practice for a sample of 127 buying‐center participants and their recall, attitude and purchase‐intention responses to B2B products placed in movie scenes. Despite some claimed negativity toward the commercial intent of the practice, results reveal that buying‐center participants find the practice to be generally acceptable for a wide array of B2B products and services.
Practical implications
Additional research supporting these findings could reveal a fruitful promotional outlet for B2B influence through placement within major motion picture productions.
Originality/value
Participants demonstrated an impressive level of recall and a modestly favorable attitude and purchase intention on exposure to experimental B2B placements viewed in movie scenes. Variables moderating that response include liking for and emotions induced by the movie, the degree of prominence and realism of the placement, and its fit with the surrounding movie content.
Details
Keywords
Kenneth R. Lord and Alice Ford Collins
Gauges the accessibility of vendors to organizational customers and compares sellers’ approaches to online communication with the preferences expressed by buyers. A survey of…
Abstract
Gauges the accessibility of vendors to organizational customers and compares sellers’ approaches to online communication with the preferences expressed by buyers. A survey of organizational buying‐center members revealed that responding organizations relied at least partially on Web‐based research for a mean of 40 percent of purchases involving supplier/vendor search. Distinct segments are observed that differ in their desire for suppliers’ Web sites to provide information about purchase facilitators (e.g. online ordering, prices, product and services information), quality/performance assessment (e.g. financial statements, company profiles, certification information), and non‐purchase information (e.g. community activities, job opportunities, company news). An analysis of vendor Web sites demonstrates a need for more systematic inclusion of prices, online ordering, literature requests, answers to frequently asked questions, certification information and financial statements.
Details
Keywords
Index by subjects, compiled by K.G.B. Bakewell covering the following journals: Facilities Volumes 8‐17; Journal of Property Investment & Finance Volumes 8‐17; Property Management…
Abstract
Index by subjects, compiled by K.G.B. Bakewell covering the following journals: Facilities Volumes 8‐17; Journal of Property Investment & Finance Volumes 8‐17; Property Management Volumes 8‐17; Structural Survey Volumes 8‐17.
Compiled by K.G.B. Bakewell covering the following journals published by MCB University Press: Facilities Volumes 8‐18; Journal of Property Investment & Finance Volumes 8‐18;…
Abstract
Compiled by K.G.B. Bakewell covering the following journals published by MCB University Press: Facilities Volumes 8‐18; Journal of Property Investment & Finance Volumes 8‐18; Property Management Volumes 8‐18; Structural Survey Volumes 8‐18.
Compiled by K.G.B. Bakewell covering the following journals published by MCB University Press: Facilities Volumes 8‐17; Journal of Property Investment & Finance Volumes 8‐17;…
Abstract
Compiled by K.G.B. Bakewell covering the following journals published by MCB University Press: Facilities Volumes 8‐17; Journal of Property Investment & Finance Volumes 8‐17; Property Management Volumes 8‐17; Structural Survey Volumes 8‐17.
Index by subjects, compiled by K.G.B. Bakewell covering the following journals: Facilities Volumes 8‐18; Journal of Property Investment & Finance Volumes 8‐18; Property Management…
Abstract
Index by subjects, compiled by K.G.B. Bakewell covering the following journals: Facilities Volumes 8‐18; Journal of Property Investment & Finance Volumes 8‐18; Property Management Volumes 8‐18; Structural Survey Volumes 8‐18.
Compiled by K.G.B. Bakewell covering the following journals published by MCB University Press: Facilities Volumes 8‐18; Journal of Property Investment & Finance Volumes 8‐18;…
Abstract
Compiled by K.G.B. Bakewell covering the following journals published by MCB University Press: Facilities Volumes 8‐18; Journal of Property Investment & Finance Volumes 8‐18; Property Management Volumes 8‐18; Structural Survey Volumes 8‐18.