Search results
1 – 2 of 2Karen Jehn, Sonja Rispens, Karsten Jonsen and Lindred Greer
– The purpose of this paper is to build theory and present a model of the development of conflicts in teams.
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to build theory and present a model of the development of conflicts in teams.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper develops a conceptual model based on past theory and research.
Findings
The model brings a multi-level perspective to the process of intragroup conflict by showing the mechanisms by which an interpersonal, dyadic conflict can spread to other team members over time through a process of conflict contagion.
Originality/value
This study provides a new model for conflict escalation and it sheds light on factors which can either ameliorate or exacerbate the speed and extent of conflict contagion. The repercussions of different degrees of conflict involvement within a team are discussed.
Details
Keywords
Sonja Rispens, Lindred L. Greer and Karen A. Jehn
The purpose of this paper is to introduce and test a model of group processes (e.g. conflict), emergent states (e.g. trust), and group context (e.g. connectedness) to better…
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to introduce and test a model of group processes (e.g. conflict), emergent states (e.g. trust), and group context (e.g. connectedness) to better understand the mechanisms that underlie the traditionally negative effects of conflict.
Design/methodology/approach
A total of 27 workgroups of a Dutch telecommunications company participated in a survey. To assess trust as a mediator between conflict and performance bootstrapping analysis was used. In addition, the moderating role of the three connectedness types was investigated with hierarchical regressions.
Findings
The results suggest that trust partially mediates the effect of task conflict and fully mediates the effect of relationship conflict on performance. Furthermore, trust is less affected by task conflict when group members are highly cognitively connected and less affected by relationship conflict when group members are highly task connected.
Research limitations/implications
This research implies that task and cognitive connectedness decrease the negative effect of conflict on trust, and hence, performance. Shortcomings include discussing the causality between conflict and trust, and the possibility of different perceptions among group members regarding group phenomena.
Practical implications
The findings suggest that managers can help to provide circumstances in which conflict is not necessarily destructive for intragroup trust and performance.
Originality/value
Provides one of the first empirical examinations of the mediating role of trust in the relationship between task and relationship conflict and perceived group performance. Additionally, examines if connectedness (the level of active involvement of group members with each other) buffers the negative effects of conflict on trust.
Details