To read this content please select one of the options below:

SOCIAL MOTIVES IN NEGOTIATION: THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN DYAD COMPOSITION, NEGOTIATION PROCESSES AND OUTCOMES

Mara Olekalns (University of Melbourne Melbourne Business School, The University of Melbourne, 200 Leicester St., Carlton, Victoria 3053, AUSTRALIA. E‐mail: m.olekalns@mbs.edu)
Philip L. Smith (University of Melbourne)

International Journal of Conflict Management

ISSN: 1044-4068

Article publication date: 1 March 2003

1060

Abstract

Using a simulated employment negotiation, this experiment examined the relationship between dyad composition, negotiation strategies and levels of joint gain. Three dyad types were created on the basis of social value orientation, proself, prosocial and mixed. A log linear analysis showed that dyads were differentiated on the basis of the strategies associated with high joint gain. We identified a generic path to high joint gain in which all dyads increased priority information and decreased contention. Overlaid on this path, we identified dyad‐specific strategies and strategy sequences associated with high joint gain. Cooperative reciprocity was critical to high joint gain only in prosocial dyads. When dyads contained at least one prosocial negotiator, process management played an important role in determining the level of joint gain. When dyads contained at least one proself negotiator, the sequences associated with high joint gain functioned to divide resources.

Citation

Olekalns, M. and Smith, P.L. (2003), "SOCIAL MOTIVES IN NEGOTIATION: THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN DYAD COMPOSITION, NEGOTIATION PROCESSES AND OUTCOMES", International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 14 No. 3/4, pp. 233-254. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022900

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2003, MCB UP Limited

Related articles