SUBORDINATE AGGRESSION AGAINST MANAGERS: EMPIRICAL ANALYSES OF PUBLISHED ARBITRATION DECISIONS

Abstract

This study empirically examined the antecedents of verbal and physical assaults on managers perpetrated by subordinate employees. A model was presented and hypotheses developed that were tested with data obtained through the content analysis of published arbitration decisions. The findings indicated that such assaults were more likely to be verbal than physical, preceded by aversive treatment, and targeted at managers directly involved in the negative outcomes. Additionally, the severity of the incident varied across the different types of triggering events. Individuals who had been aggressive in the past but had not been disciplined were more likely to subsequently engage in physical than verbal assaults. The implications of these findings for future research and organizational practices were also discussed.

Citation

Allen, R.E. and Lucero, M.A. (1998), "SUBORDINATE AGGRESSION AGAINST MANAGERS: EMPIRICAL ANALYSES OF PUBLISHED ARBITRATION DECISIONS", International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 234-257. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022811