AN ANALYSIS OF ABSENTEEISM ARBITRATION CASES: FACTORS USED BY ARBITRATORS IN MAKING DECISIONS

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if arbitrators use all seven of Dougherty's tests of just cause in cases involving discharge for excessive absenteeism. One hundred and ninety‐five absenteeism cases published by the Bureau of National Affairs and Commerce Clearing House between 1980 and 1990 were analyzed. Four of Dougherty's key tests were found to be critical: Penalty, Equal Treatment, Proof, and Notice. Logistic regression analysis of the data reveals that if these four tests are met by management, there is an almost certain probability that a grievance for excessive absenteeism discharge will be denied. If, however, any one of these tests is not met, the probability is greater than 99 percent that the grievance will be fully sustained or split.

Citation

Clay, J.M. and Stephens, E.C. (1994), "AN ANALYSIS OF ABSENTEEISM ARBITRATION CASES: FACTORS USED BY ARBITRATORS IN MAKING DECISIONS", International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 130-142. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022739