THE ADMINISTRATION OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION IN NEW ZEALAND AND THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY: A COMPARISON

Abstract

The Australian Capital Territory has shaken off the bonds of the New South Wales Department of Education and instituted an Authority responsible directly to the Federal Government. The new system includes in its design for “a working partnership for local‐central control” school boards. This paper attempts a comparison of that partnership with that evolved within the New Zealand experience. The A.C.T. Authority as it is presently constituted exercises control only over government primary and secondary schools. The discussion is therefore restricted to these fields and ignores preschool and technical education and independent schools, all of which are expected eventually to be brought within the scope of the Authority. Six issues are discussed in detail: (1) the general question of centralisation, (2) the role of a centralised agency, (3) the role of the community in an education system, (4) life‐long education, (5) the appointment of staff, and (6) the control of finance.

Citation

DOSSOR, P. (1976), "THE ADMINISTRATION OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION IN NEW ZEALAND AND THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY: A COMPARISON", Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb009741