Occupational identity of staff and attitudes towards institutional closure

Abstract

Purpose

Deinstitutionalization has impacts also on direct care workers and their work. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the attitudes of direct care workers towards the closure of the institution, and these attitudes’ relation to workers’ occupational identity.

Design/methodology/approach

Data were collected by postal questionnaire before the closure of the institution. The respondents consisted of two groups: direct care workers of the institution (n=93) and direct care workers of community-based residential units run by the same organization (n=117).

Findings

The results clearly show that direct care workers in the institution, as a group, were against the closure of the institution. This is quite understandable, because the closure will irrevocably affect their work and also private life. Although this opposing is evident, there was also variance in the attitudes within this group: some were more willing to accept the change, some were more against it. Those opposing the closure seemed to be more reluctant in adopting the new kind of identity as supporters of the self-determination of their clients and also they felt more insecure about their own competence.

Originality/value

In deinstitutionalization research a staff perspective has not been very common. To successfully accomplish the change process it is important to take into account also the staff and how they experience the change. It would be far more beneficial to have staff promoting change than resisting it.

Citation

T. Vesala, H., Teittinen, A. and Heinonen, P. (2014), "Occupational identity of staff and attitudes towards institutional closure", Tizard Learning Disability Review, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 134-141. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLDR-03-2013-0021