Virtual ethnography: corporate virtual diversity communication
Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management
ISSN: 1746-5648
Article publication date: 8 June 2015
Abstract
Purpose
Research examining organizational diversity has largely ignored the role corporate web sites play in establishing the tone for diversity in organizations. Serving as “electronic storefronts,” corporate web sites are typically the first point of contact individuals have with an organization. The purpose of this paper is to centralize communication as a critical tool in understanding the strategies corporations use to communicate their diversity philosophy, practices and policies. This virtual ethnographic study examines corporate web sites (n=100) across industries and sectors to capture the strategies organizations use to strategically communicate diversity to a variety of stakeholders.
Design/methodology/approach
Taking a virtual ethnographic, this study examines 100 corporate web sites across industries to capture the methods organizations employ to strategically communicate diversity in their respective organization.
Findings
Results from this ethnographic study reveal that organizations typically use three strategies in their diversity messages: impression management, persuasion and strategic ambiguity. Strategic ambiguity and the persuasive use of selling, telling and framing their diversity message are ubiquitous in corporate diversity communication. The use of these strategies may have a profound impact on how diversity is perceived within organizations. Implications for practice and research are discussed.
Originality/value
This is one of the first social science/humanistic studies to examine diversity messages on corporate web sites and advances a conceptual framework for electronic diversity communication. Additionally, this project employs a virtual ethnographic approach, a novel, yet contemporary, method.
Keywords
Citation
Long, S.D., Doerer, S. and Stewart, O.J. (2015), "Virtual ethnography: corporate virtual diversity communication", Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 175-200. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-03-2014-1207
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2015, Emerald Group Publishing Limited