To read this content please select one of the options below:

Team coordination and organizational routines: bottoms up – and top down

George Christopher Banks (Department of Management, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States)
Jeffrey M. Pollack (Department of Management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States)
Anson Seers (Department of Management, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States)

Management Decision

ISSN: 0025-1747

Article publication date: 20 June 2016

2417

Abstract

Purpose

Conceptualizations of work coordination historically assumed that work systems are put into place and that these systems shape the ability of workers to accomplish tasks. Formalization has thus long been invoked as an explanatory mechanism for work coordination. Recent studies have extended interest in emergent implicit and relational coordination, yet their underlying mechanisms of bottom-up coordination have yet to be explicated such that formal top-down coordination can be approached as a complementary mechanism rather than an alternative substitute. The purpose of this paper is to integrate the literatures related to coordination and routines, and extend analysis of bottom-up coordination toward an understanding of how it can be complemented by top-down formalized coordination of routines within organizations. Implications of this work, for both theory and practice, are discussed.

Design/methodology/approach

A conceptual review was conducted.

Findings

By integrating the literatures related to coordination and routines, the authors extend analysis of bottom-up coordination toward an understanding of how it can be complemented by top-down formalized coordination of routines within organizations.

Research limitations/implications

From a theory-based point of view, in the present work, the authors integrated the literatures related to coordination and routines and arrived at the conclusion that bottom-up coordination can be complemented by top-down formalized coordination of routines within organizations.

Practical implications

The authors suggest that there is a need in the contemporary workplace for implicit, relational processes to enable individuals to continuously assess what changes are needed and adapt coordinated routines to accomplish the task at hand. This propensity will continue to increase as technology facilitates even more seamless communication among employees, organizations, and external partners.

Originality/value

For the first time the authors integrate the literatures related to coordination and routines, in order to extend analysis of bottom-up coordination toward an understanding of how it can be complemented by top-down formalized coordination of routines within organizations.

Keywords

Citation

Banks, G.C., Pollack, J.M. and Seers, A. (2016), "Team coordination and organizational routines: bottoms up – and top down", Management Decision, Vol. 54 No. 5, pp. 1059-1072. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2014-0442

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles