Exploring collaboration technology use: how users’ perceptions twist and amend reality
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to examine how a collaboration technology is used by three organizational groups. The main focus is on the interplay between the users’ perceptions (of the technology and of the knowledge shared) and the material properties of the collaboration technology.
Design/methodology/approach
Two theoretical frameworks (social representations and sociomaterial practice perspective) examine collaboration technology use to better understand the underlying dynamics. The research is conducted as a case study in a US company where a collaboration technology was being implemented.
Findings
The findings reveal a process model showing how social dynamics and users’ perceptions of what the collaboration technology can do and cannot do to share the users’ knowledge influence the users’ behaviour. Based on these perceptions, users will twist or amend their interpretation of the reality (the material properties of the technology) to justify their use of the collaboration technology.
Research limitations/implications
This research is conducted as a single case study. However, the significant amount of time spent at the research site allowed for a very rich description of the events and processes involved.
Practical implications
This study offers guidelines on what influences use and adoption of collaboration technologies. It highlights the importance of providing more than just training, as social dynamics and users’ perceptions continuously influence users’ behaviour.
Originality/value
By combining two complementary theoretical frameworks, this study provides a novel and more in-depth explanation of collaboration technology use (or lack thereof).
Keywords
Acknowledgements
The research was supported by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, Ottawa, Canada.
Citation
Dulipovici, A. and Vieru, D. (2015), "Exploring collaboration technology use: how users’ perceptions twist and amend reality", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 661-681. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2014-0468
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2015, Emerald Group Publishing Limited