Explaining process orientation failure and success in health care – three case studies

Abstract

Purpose

In order to improve cooperation and collaboration between units, clinics and departments, many health care organizations (HCOs) have introduced process orientation. Several studies indicate problems in realizing these ambitions. The purpose of this paper is to explain and understand the success and failure of process orientation in HCOs.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors conducted three case studies and applied Actor-Network Theory as an analytic lens.

Findings

The realization of process orientation is hindered by neglect or resistance from physicians, who find the process targets to be of low medical priority. However, the authors also see that medical priorities are no stable entities but are susceptible to negotiations. Over time, process organization, process mapping, process measurement activities and the acting of enroled actors may have impact on medical priorities.

Originality/value

Contrary to previous research, the findings indicate that New Public Management may not be the main obstacle against processes, that accounting figures may not be hard to disregard and that the role of leadership is not paramount.

Citation

Hellman, S., Kastberg, G. and Siverbo, S. (2015), "Explaining process orientation failure and success in health care – three case studies", Journal of Health Organization and Management, Vol. 29 No. 6, pp. 638-653. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-09-2013-0186