Brand personality and sexuality levels of luxury advertisements
Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management
ISSN: 1361-2026
Article publication date: 19 August 2019
Issue publication date: 12 September 2019
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to determine the perceived personality of brands featuring different levels of sexuality in advertisements of luxury fashion brands.
Design/methodology/approach
To determine the identity of the company a “personality traits” scale by Geurens et al. (2015) was used with 25 brand personalities: conscientiousness/responsibility, extraversion/activity, emotional stability/emotionality, agreeableness/aggressiveness, and openness/simplicity. The final survey was then made available on Amazon Turk for two weeks. Each participant assessed one photograph at a level of sexuality given the gender they identified with the most.
Findings
There were 1,266 participants including 701 females and 565 females. Statistical analysis of the responses revealed that the degree of sexuality in the advertisements impacted brand perceptions. Among both genders, the greater degree of sexuality in the advertisement, the more the brand was considered less conscientious and responsible. The results also suggested that men and women view levels of sexuality differently. They varied most in the area of openness and simplicity, with men viewing advertisements of male models that had greater sexuality as simple. Men felt less sexuality was more emotional and romantic, while women viewed mid-level degree of sexuality in this manner.
Originality/value
Limited research has examined how level of sexuality influences perceived brand personality. The results contribute to theories pertaining to motivations to identify with a luxury fashion brand and provide strategies for luxury fashion brands to enhance their intended brand image.
Keywords
Citation
Adomaitis, A.D. and Saiki, D. (2019), "Brand personality and sexuality levels of luxury advertisements", Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 572-586. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-01-2019-0004
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited