Effects of luxury brand attachment and perceived envy on schadenfreude: does need for uniqueness moderate?

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to investigate how luxury brand attachment (LBA) and perceived envy may influence schadenfreude. In addition, the moderating influence of consumers’ need for uniqueness (CNFU) and private vs public consumption is examined.

Design/methodology/approach

Data were collected from a consumer panel in Australia. A total of 365 valid and useable responses were analysed through structural equation modelling in AMOS 26.

Findings

The results show that LBA has a significant impact on perceived envy. Consumers’ perceived envy also results in schadenfreude. However, LBA did not have any significant impact on schadenfreude. The moderating influence of CNFU is partially supported. This research further confirms that consumers’ public consumption has more relevance to visible social comparison and potential feelings of malicious envy towards others.

Practical implications

The research model may work as a strategic tool to identify, which group of consumers (e.g. high vs low attachment) displays stronger envy and schadenfreude. Brand managers can also explore the personality traits and psychological dynamics that influence the consumers to express emotional bonds and malicious joy within the context of consumer-brand relationships.

Originality/value

This is one of the first few studies that have examined the relationships amongst consumers’ brand attachment, perceived envy, schadenfreude and need for uniqueness within a luxury branding context.

Citation

Shimul, A.S., Sung, B. and Phau, I. (2021), "Effects of luxury brand attachment and perceived envy on schadenfreude: does need for uniqueness moderate?", Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 38 No. 6, pp. 709-720. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-09-2020-4125