To read this content please select one of the options below:

Examining the relationships between face concerns and dissent

Stephen M. Croucher (School of Communication, Journalism and Marketing, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand)
Stephanie Kelly (Department of Business Education, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA)
Hui Chen (School of Communication, Journalism and Marketing, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand)
Doug Ashwell (School of Communication, Journalism and Marketing, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand)

International Journal of Conflict Management

ISSN: 1044-4068

Article publication date: 5 May 2020

Issue publication date: 29 January 2021

530

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationships between face concerns, articulated (upward) dissent and organizational assimilation. In this study, articulated dissent was conceptualized as a type of dissent.

Design/methodology/approach

A questionnaire was distributed to 370 working adults in the USA via Qualtrics. The questionnaire measured five face concerns, namely, self, other and mutual-face, articulated dissent and organizational assimilation. Before hypothesis testing, each measure was subjected to a confirmatory factor analysis to ensure that the hypothesized factor structure held. Pearson correlation and ordinary least squares estimation were used to test the hypotheses.

Findings

Conceptualizing dissent as a type of conflict, the findings of the current study are as follows: self-face and assimilation are positively correlated, other-face and assimilation are positively correlated, mutual-face and assimilation are positively correlated, assimilation and articulated dissent are positively correlated and organizational assimilation mediated the relationship between mutual-face and articulated dissent.

Research limitations/implications

Theoretically, the self-presentation process (face) is more critical as a person becomes part of an organization; it is through assimilating into an organization that members become familiar with the norms of an organization and more comfortable dissenting to their superiors (articulated dissent); and the more the authors integrate with the work colleagues the more the authors engage in mutual face-saving.

Practical implications

The results of this study demonstrate that self-presentation is critical as a person becomes part of an organization, particularly when it comes to managing conflict.

Originality/value

This is the first study to link facework with organizational dissent. The results add to the understanding of how face affects whether we choose to express this kind of conflict behavior.

Keywords

Citation

Croucher, S.M., Kelly, S., Chen, H. and Ashwell, D. (2021), "Examining the relationships between face concerns and dissent", International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 20-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-11-2019-0215

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles