Administrative cost

, 36

Advanced Technology Program (ATP)

, 15–17

Agglomeration of R&D facilities and involvement

, 33

Analysts

, 28–30

Analytic hierarchy process (AHP)

, 20–21, 23–24, 81–83

evaluation

, 25

method

, 71–73

Appropriate objectives

, 61–62

Assessment items

, 59, 61–62

Backward linkage effect

, 47–48

Balanced regional development

, 24–25

Baseline analysis

, 40–41

Behavioral approaches

, 28

Behavioral interventions

, 28

Benefit

, 36

estimation methodology

, 83–84

period

, 41

of R&D projects

, 37–38

Benefit–cost (B/C)

analysis

, 81–82

framework

, 13–14

ratio

, 20–21, 83

techniques

, 7, 9, 24

Bottom-up approach

, 38–40

Building area

, 33

Business effects

, 36

Comprehensive feasibility analysis theory

, 71–72

Contract method for risk sharing

, 15–17

Cost

cost-effectiveness analysis

, 47–48

cost–benefit analysis

, 24–25, 36–37, 40–41

cost–benefit–cost ratio

, 46

drivers of R&D

, 32–33

estimates

, 31–32

estimators

, 31–32

savings

, 44

Data mining

, 66

Decision-makers

, 7, 9, 27

Decision-making. See also Policy

competence

, 7–9

by decision-makers

, 7, 9, 27

process

, 25

Department of Commerce (DOC)

, 15–17

Direct benefits of R&D projects

, 38–40

Direct cost

, 32–33

Direct effects

, 47–48

Direct government funding of R&D

, 5–6

Discount rate of OECD model

, 13–14

Economic analysis

, 23–24

Economic assessment

, 20–21

Economic benefits

, 36

Economic effects of R&D activities

, 41

Economic feasibility analysis

, 36–37, 49–50

Economics analysis

, 20–21

Enterprise

, 75–76

Equipment reinvestment cost

, 34–35

EU, global sensation in

, 17–19

EUREKA program

, 17–19

European Co-operation in the Field of Science and Technical Research (COST)

, 17–18

Evaluation research

, 7–9

Evaluators

, 71–72

Ex post appraisal

, 23–24

Expert judgment

, 66

Exploration Research for Advanced Technology (ERATO)

, 19–20

External effect

, 5–6, 47–48

Facility costs

, 33

Feasibility analysis for R&D projects

, 21–22

Feasibility study

, 23–24, 31–32

Floor area

, 33

Forward linkage effect

, 47–48

French rate

, 13–14

Funding plan

, 50–51

Gate screening process

, 18–19

German rate

, 13–14

Global sensation

, 15

EU

, 17–19

Japan

, 19–20

South Korea

, 20–22

United States

, 15–17

Goods

, 13–14

Governance of national R&D projects

, 53–54

Government

, 5–6

government-funded R&D funds

, 87–88

government-sponsored frontier R&D projects

, 37–38

policy

, 15

R&D budget

, 1–2

R&D project

, 3–4

High-performance computers and communication program (HPCC program)

, 15–17

Horizontal governance

, 53–54

Impact analysis model

, 75–76

Income redistribution

, 11–12

Indirect benefits

, 36–37

Indirect cost

, 32–33

Infrastructure planning process

, 23–24

Innovation system, failure of

, 5–6

Intangible benefit

, 38–40

Intellectual property rights

, 43–44

Internal effect

, 47–48

Internal rate of return (IRR)

, 20–21, 46

Japan, global sensation in

, 19–20

Job creation, economic effects of

, 78–79

Joint Research Center (JRC)

, 17–18

Joint Research Center for Atom Technology (JRCAT)

, 19–20

Knowledge ripple

, 36–38

Labor cost

, 36

Large-scale investment projects

, 25

Large-scale research facilities (LSRFs)

, 77–79

importance

, 77–78

priorities

, 79

Logical model

, 62–63

Managers

, 28–30

Market

failure

, 5–6

good effects

, 47–48

ripple

, 36–37

Ministry of Strategy and Finance

, 21–22

Multicriteria analysis

, 24–25

Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA)

, 71–72

Multidisciplinary analysis

, 25

Multiregional input–output model

, 49–50

National core competencies

, 15–17

National goals

, 13–14

National Institute of Standard and Technology (NIST)

, 15–17

National large-scale research facilities and equipment

, 77–78

National Project Coordinator (NPC)

, 18–19

National projects

, 51–52

National R&D projects

, 3–4, 40–41, 52

National Science Foundation (NSF)

, 79

Net average rate of return

, 46

Net present value (NPV)

, 20–21, 46

of cash flows

, 11–12

Network ripple

, 36–37

New Action Group (NAG)

, 17–18

Normative policy analysts

, 28–30

Office of Government Commerce

, 18–19

Office of Management and Budget (OMB)

, 15–17

Operating costs

, 34–36

Operational maintenance cost

, 34–35

Options approach

, 23–24

Patents

, 43–44

Payback period

, 20–21, 46

Pecuniary effect

, 47–48

Planners

, 28–30

Planning

, 63–65

Policy. See also Technology

actors

, 52

analysis

, 7, 9, 23–24, 28, 30

analysts

, 7, 9, 28

analytical capacity

, 52

evaluation

, 28

feasibility analysis

, 52

policy-level reviews

, 49–50

research

, 7–9

Policymakers

, 27

Postmanagement

, 15–17

Preliminary adjustment

, 21–22

Preliminary feasibility study

, 5–6, 15, 20, 34–35, 37–38, 49–50, 67, 69

on construction projects

, 38–40

cost of

, 31–32

estimates

, 38–40

method

, 23–25

of pure R&D projects

, 42

for R&D

, 51–52

researchers

, 72–73

Private investment, productivity of

, 11–12

Private sector R&D budget

, 1–2, 75–76

Productivity of private investment

, 11–12

Project management

approach

, 59–61

systems

, 37–38

Project objectives

, 61–62

Project plans

, 50–51

Projects

, 71–72

Promotion systems

, 53–54

Propulsion system

, 53–54

Public decision processes

, 7–9

Public investment

, 11–12

analysis

, 11–12

cost and benefit of

, 11–14

Public policy

, 7–9

Public R&D policy

, 1–2

Public research institutes

, 84

Public works

, 11–12

Qualitative ripple effects

, 56–57

Quantification effect

, 47–48

Quantitative risk analysis methods

, 55

R&D

, 1–2

activities

, 31–32

budget

, 1–2

business planning

, 81

centers

, 5–6

commercialization success rate

, 42–43

contribution

, 87–88

cost

, 32–33

expenditure

, 34, 41

impact

, 3–4

investment effect

, 21–22

personnel

, 75–76

portfolio planning

, 59–61

preliminary feasibility study

, 81, 87–88

of private sector

, 75–76

and production interface

, 75–76

projects

, 15, 17, 21–24, 31–32, 61–62, 87–88

of public sector

, 75–76

tasks and institutions

, 19–20, 63, 65

units

, 44–46

Rational decision-making models

, 7, 9, 28

Real effect

, 47–48

Relevant plans

, 51–52

Request for proposals (RFPs)

, 18–19

Research equipment construction plan

, 34

Research facility construction plan

, 33

Research tasks

, 32–33

Ripple effects

, 36–37, 49–50, 56–57

of regional economic

, 82–83

Risk

, 54–55

analysis

, 50–51, 55

factors

, 55

identification

, 50–51

management

, 3–4

Roadmaps

, 79

Scholars

, 28

Science and technology

, 77–78

Scientific research results

, 5–6

Social discount rate

, 11–14

South Korea, global sensation in

, 20–22

Special assessment items

, 59–61

Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC)

, 15–17

Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI)

, 18–19

Strategy

, 5–6

Sustainability

, 43–44

Tangible benefit

, 38–40

Tasks

, 3–4

Technical analysis

, 23–24

Technical Committee (TC)

, 17–18

Technical feasibility analysis model

, 32–33, 59, 61

Technical levels

, 66–67

Technology

development roadmap

, 61–62

fundamental corporate strategy of technology-based innovation

, 33

gap theory

, 65–66

innovation

, 5–6

management

, 65–66

trend analysis

, 65–66

Top-down approach

, 38–40

Total cost

, 34–35

United States, global sensation in

, 15–17

Unskilled labor, wage rate of

, 13–14

Value for money (VFM)

, 18–19

Value-added effect

, 47–48

Value-independent analysis

, 7–9

Vertical governance

, 53–54

Wage rate

, 13–14