Index
ISBN: 978-1-80043-721-0, eISBN: 978-1-80043-720-3
Publication date: 30 June 2021
This content is currently only available as a PDF
Citation
Fleuß, D. (2021), "Index", Radical Proceduralism, Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 189-192. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-720-320211010
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2021 Dannica Fleuß. Published under exclusive license by Emerald Publishing Limited
INDEX
Autonomy
, 49–50, 110, 114, 127
Citizens
constitutional system
, 65
deliberation
, 67
democratic citizens
, 4–5, 105, 118
institutional designs
, 134, 136–138, 140–141, 143–145, 148, 152
intersubjective learning
, 108–109
liberal-democratic systems
, 58–59
ordinary citizens
, 81–82
political agents
, 42
political liberalism
, 93–94
political theory of justice
, 59
radical proceduralism
, 121, 129–130
reasonable quality
, 89
self-determination
, 90
Constitutional court
, 7, 17, 66–67, 81, 119, 146, 152–155, 157
Constitutional provisions
, 90–92
Constitutional state
, 76–83
Constructivism
, 24, 52–53, 86
Cooperative discursive designs
, 133–137
Counteraction
, 103, 143, 146, 160, 167
Crisis reform
, 163–164
Democracy
democratic crisis
, 1, 5–6, 161, 163–164, 167
democratic innovations
, 137–139, 142, 147, 159, 165–166
democratic legitimacy. See Democratic legitimacy
democratic toolkit
, 145–146, 159–161, 165–166
institutions
, 10–12
Democratic legitimacy
, 1–4
communicative action
, 70–76
democratic ideals
, 15–16
epistemic dimension
, 87
ideal speech situation
, 70–76
Democratic procedures
, 90–92
Democratic reform
, 163–164
Disagreement reform
, 163–164
Dryzek, J.
, 9–10, 14, 22, 44–45, 82, 108–109, 112–113, 123, 129, 133–136, 138, 143, 152, 167, 171
Epistemic abstinence
, 40–45
Equality
, 93–96
Estlund, D.
, 19, 27, 34–38, 41, 87, 89, 103, 164
Expertise
, 93–96
Expertocratic, expertocracy
, 7–8, 10, 13, 27–28, 35, 43, 81, 85, 93, 125, 152
Fairness transfer
, 54–55
Germany/German
, 11–12, 80–81, 121–123, 137–139, 142, 165–166
Habermas, J.
, 9, 11, 24, 26, 47, 69, 83, 86, 88–89, 91–92, 95–96, 104–105, 107–108, 119, 133, 135, 158, 165
Iceland, Icelandic
, 11–12, 137–139, 142, 147–148, 151, 159, 161, 165–167
Ideal theory
, 20–21, 68–69, 113
Inclusion
, 9, 16, 18, 46–47, 86, 96, 98, 104, 113, 122, 134
Inclusive participation
, 110–114
Institutional designs
, 9–10, 13–14, 18–19, 23–24, 68–69, 88, 99–100, 103, 117, 124, 134–137, 142–143, 149, 161, 165–167
open democracy
, 143–160
participatory institutional design (PID)
, 144
poitical institution
, 16–19
radical proceduralist institutional design
, 133–143
Institutions
action-guiding
, 27–29
constitutional state
, 76–83
constructivist
, 23–27
decision making
, 95–96
deliberative politics
, 76–83
democratic legitimacy
, 62–69
legitimate democratic institutions
, 107–108
metatheoretical challenges
, 19–29
political stability
, 62–69
system of rights
, 76–83
Instrumentalists
, 87
Kant, I.
, 24, 49–52, 76, 86, 90, 99, 104–105, 113
Landemore, H.
, 34, 43, 114, 118, 137–138, 144–145
Legislation
, 148–152
Legitimacy
democratic legitimacy
, 1, 15–16, 49–51, 53, 62, 69–70, 76, 85–87, 89, 100, 103–106, 122–123, 133, 146, 161, 164–165
political legitimacy
, 8–9, 17, 23–24, 29, 32, 34, 50–52, 87–88, 104–105, 107, 110, 160–161
Open democracy
, 118, 144–145
Openness
, 76, 114, 118, 120, 133, 145, 169–170
open-endedness
, 118–120
reflectiveness
, 114–118
Parliament
, 7, 17, 66–67, 81, 126, 147, 159
Participation
deliberative participation
, 115
democratic legislative process
, 77
democratic politics
, 163
equal autonomy
, 110–114
inclusive participation
, 133
open-ended citizen participation
, 136
political participation
, 147–148, 170
public political forum
, 94
routinised participation
, 160
Participatory institutional design (PID)
, 135–139, 144, 147, 160, 166
Participatory toolkits
, 160–161
Paternalism
, 7–8, 43, 102, 134, 156, 164–166
Paternalistic threat
, 7–8, 14, 43, 85, 103, 154–157, 164–165
Philosophical modesty
, 68–69
Policies
legislation
, 148–152
policymaking
, 148–152
Policymaking
, 148–152
Political criticism
, 13–14
Political institutions
, 1, 8, 13–14, 16, 18–19, 38, 52, 62–64, 66–67, 78, 97, 121, 127–128, 139–140, 154, 163, 167, 169–170
institutional design
, 16–19
Political legitimacy
, 8–9, 17, 23–24, 29, 32, 34, 50–52, 87–88, 104–105, 107, 110, 160–161
Political liberalism
, 59, 61
Political theory
, 13–14
Political truth
action-guiding approach
, 134, 164–165
community
, 128
democratic legitimacy
, 28
democratizing normative theory
, 103
epistemic abstinence
, 40–45
equality
, 93
expertise
, 93
proceduralism
, 8–9, 120
procedure-independent political truth
, 9
radical proceduralism
, 40, 87
Politics
deliberative
, 76–83
epistemic abstinence
, 40–45
Proceduralism
, 45–47
citizens
, 120–132
limits of
, 98–102
political theorists
, 120–132
radical proceduralism
, 125–130
Procedures
aggregative procedures
, 112
construction procedure
, 57
deliberative procedures
, 115
democratic legitimacy
, 31, 40, 53
democratic political procedures
, 66
democratic political systems
, 17
democratic procedures
, 87, 98, 167
political procedures
, 18
political truth
, 40–45
procedure-external standards
, 164
procedure-independent notions
, 8–9, 104–105
radical proceduralism
, 86
rational proceduralism
, 34–38
Radical proceduralism
, 38, 40, 60
claims
, 129
deflationary discursive account
, 105–110
democratizing normative theory
, 103–110
disagreement
, 168–169
equal autonomy
, 110–114
Habermas’s deliberative proceduralism
, 69–83
inclusive participation
, 110–114
institutional experimentation
, 9
openness
, 114–118
participatory toolkits
, 160–161
paternalism
, 164–166
political theorists
, 125–130
political truth. See Political truth
Rawls’s liberal proceduralism
, 52–69
roles
, 129
systematic challenges
, 85–98
Radical proceduralist institutional design
cooperative discursive designs
, 133–137
participatory toolkits
, 160–161
re-designing institutions
, 137–143
re-thinking institutions
, 137–143
social engineering design
, 133–137
Radical proceduralist philosopher
, 129–130, 135, 137, 168–169
Radical proceduralist theorist
, 125, 128–129, 136
Rational reconstruction
, 26, 74–75, 99, 108
Rawls, J.
, 9, 11, 16, 20–21, 24–27, 47, 52, 69, 86, 90–91, 93–94, 97, 99, 104–105, 156, 165
Raz, J.
, 8, 32–34, 36, 87
Realism
, 20–23, 29–30
Reflection
, 24, 50, 62, 112, 123, 143, 152, 161
Reflectiveness
, 6, 11, 114, 117–118, 139, 143, 149–150, 169–170
Reform
constitutional reforms
, 147
crisis reform
, 163–164
democratic reform
, 163–164
disagreement reform
, 163–164
effectiveness
, 166–167
expertocratic reform proposals
, 7–9
institutional reform
, 7–8, 134, 137–138, 159
political reform
, 28
proposals
, 147–148
radical proceduralist reform
, 166–167
viability
, 166–167
Representative democracy
, 82, 144–145, 161
Rousseau, J.
, 50, 123–124
Self-legislation
, 50
Social engineering design
, 133–137
Social movements
, 146, 158–159
System of rights
, 76–83
Transfer of justice
, 54–55
Truth
, 45–47
Waldron, J.
, 3, 39, 44, 111, 122–123, 153, 171
- Prelims
- Introduction: Democratic Legitimacy, Democratic Crises, Everyday (Political) Practice
- Chapter 1 Bridging the Gap between Principles and Institutions: Meta-theoretical and Methodological Considerations
- Chapter 2 Procedure, Substance, Democratic Legitimacy: A Framework for the Debate
- Chapter 3 Two Forms of Proceduralism: Rawls's and Habermas's Theories of Democratic Legitimacy
- Chapter 4 Normative Proceduralism and Its Limitations in “Post-metaphysical” Political Theory
- Chapter 5 Radical Proceduralist Ideals: A Discursive Account
- Chapter 6 Institutional Designs as Conversation Starters: Ask Citizens, Not Philosophers!
- Chapter 7 Conclusion: Democratic Institutions for Radical Proceduralists and Other Citizens
- References
- Index