Index
Marie-Line Germain
(Western Carolina University, USA)
Integrating Service-Learning and Consulting in Distance Education
ISBN: 978-1-78769-412-5, eISBN: 978-1-78769-409-5
Publication date: 1 July 2019
This content is currently only available as a PDF
Citation
Germain, M.-L. (2019), "Index", Integrating Service-Learning and Consulting in Distance Education, Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 225-234. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-409-520191014
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © Marie-Line Germain, 2019
INDEX
Administration, university and
, 158–160
Agenda, for feedback meeting
, 75
Alumni
, 159
of Master’s in HR program
, 162
students
, 160
and business professionals
, 162
Asynchronous technology
, 182, 188
Audit form, organizational assessment and
, 127–132
Babson Survey Research Group Survey
, 9–10, 38
Barriers to the creation of swift trust in virtual teams
, 105–114
individual barriers
, 106–107
organizational barriers
, 107–108
team barriers
, 109–110
technological barriers
, 108–109
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
, 35–39
Brick-and-mortar institutions
, 39
Brown’s School of Professional Studies (SPS)
, 18
Brown University
, 18–19
Business professionals, alumni students and
, 162
CEUs. See Continuing education units (CEUs)
Civic responsibility
, 5, 46, 158–159
Client
communication with
, 135–136
and community
, 163–164
consultant relationship closure
, 139–143
first draft of the consulting work to
, 136–138
resetting goals and expectations
, 138
Client–consultant calls
, 121
Client–consultant relationship development
, 101–103
Client-organizations
, 151–153
in Master of Science in Human Resources (MSHR)
, 152–153
Client’s and consultant’s assumptions
, 100–101
Collaboration platform
, 63–64, 89, 94, 99–100, 111–112, 126, 133–134, 169–170, 171–173, 181–182
Columbia University
, 19–20
Columbia Video Network
, 19–20
Communication
with client
, 135–136
face-to-face
, 63
Community, client and
, 163–164
Community college students
, 2
Community involvement
, 5, 52
Community partners
, 5–6, 46, 48–49, 51, 52, 54, 155–156, 173–174
Community service
, 4–6, 45, 46–47, 49–50, 155–156, 158–159, 187
activities
, 5
traditional
, 155–156, 173–174
Competencies, clear statement of
, 177–178
Confidentiality
, 63–64, 172–173
Consultancy
goals of
, 68
people involved in
, 68
preparing for
, 122
stages of
, 68–77, 121
Consultant
effective
, 59–60
external
, 60–61, 62
internal
, 60–62
self-reflection
, 142–143
skills and experience
, 125
students as
, 77–80
traits and skills
, 59–60
Consulting
for-profit vs. not-for-profit organizations
, 66–67
in-person vs. virtual
, 63–64
internal vs. external
, 60–62
model, HR-related projects
, 148–150
pro bono vs. paid
, 64–66
stages
, 67–77
action
, 76
data collection and diagnosis
, 72–73
entry and contracting
, 69–72
evaluation and withdrawal
, 76–77
feedback and design for action
, 73–76
Consulting process
addressing low client and student engagement
, 132–134
client’s resistance to change
, 134–135
compliant client
, 135
Consulting project draft
, 138–139, 140
Consulting team
, 87–100
consultant
, 97–100
student teams
, 97–100
faculty
, 89–91
project manager
, 91–94
job description
, 95–96
selection
, 91–94
team leader
, 94–97
job description
, 98–99
Continuing education units (CEUs)
, 22
Contract
entry and
, 69–72
formulation
, 71
ground rules for
, 71–72
learning
, 122, 172–173, 181–182, 188
Conventional control mechanisms
, 107–108
Cornell University
, 20
Corporate social responsibility
, 162
Course release
, 168, 174
Creators’ intention
, 10
Credibility establishment
, 103–104
Credit-bearing course
, 46
Critical analysis
, 52
Critical thinking
, 147–148
Cultural factors
, 109
Dartmouth College
, 20–21
Defensive routines
, 107
Dewey’s theory
, 46
Digital learning
, 39
Distance education
current trends in United States
, 9–23
outside the United States
, 33–40
Distance learning program, phone-based
, 15
Doctor of Physical Therapy program
, 40
e-Consulting
, 51–52, 87
benefits of
, 156–158
faculty
, 160
project manager
, 160–161
team leaders/students
, 161–163
university and administration
, 158–160
initiative in an online degree program
, 147–150
legal considerations
, 173
limitations
, 170–173
model
, 80–82, 119, 150
plan for long-term sustainability
, 168–169
problem-solving environments with
, 56
projects
, 147–148
student, client, and faculty satisfaction
, 164–168
eCornell program
, 20
Education development
, 26–33, 36–38
education 1.0
, 28–29
education 2.0
, 29
education 3.0
, 29–31
education 4.0
, 31
education 5.0
, 31–33
EdX
, 11, 12
Effective consultants
, 59–60
e-Learning market
, 16–17
Emotional web
, 25–26
Emotiv Systems Inc.
, 25–26
Employee, marketability and social responsibility
, 56
Employment and wages
, 3
Engagement
client and student
, 132–134
community service
, 51–52
e-Service learning
, 5–6, 46–52, 56, 159
benefits of
, 53–56, 155–156
communication
, 181–182
components
, 179, 188
consulting projects
, 117
cost
, 169–173
courses
clear statement of competencies
, 177–178
design
, 183–185
digital access
, 51–52
employee marketability and social responsibility
, 56
initiatives
, 177–180, 188
limitations
, 170–173
metrics of success
, 185–187
opportunities
, 174
people, roles and responsibilities
, 180–181
program
, 174
projects by degree level
, 79
skills acquired through
, 55
technology
, 182–183
typology
, 47–50
value of
, 55
Expert skills (expertise)
, 59–60
External consultants
, 60–61, 62
External consulting vs. internal consulting
, 60–62
Extreme Service-Learning
, 50
Face-to-face communication
, 40, 63
Faculty, e-consulting
, 160
Fathom
, 19
Flawless Consulting (Block)
, 102
For-profit organizations vs. not-for-profit organizations
, 66–67
Gamification
, 40
Gen Z
, 31–32
Grading rubric
, 91, 92
Graduate school students
, 2
Ground rules, for contracting
, 71–72
GuideStar.org
, 89–90
Harvard University
, 21
Higher education institutions, online-learning enrollments in
, 45–46
Human Resources (HR)
, 163–164
consultants
, 147
e-consulting course
, 127–132
projects, consulting model
, 148–150
See also Master of Science in Human Resource (MSHR)
Hybrid Type I
, 47–48
Hybrid Type II
, 47–49
Hybrid Type III
, 47–48, 49–50
Hybrid Type IV
, 47–48, 50
ILN. See Interactive Learning Network (ILN)
In-person consulting vs. virtual consulting
, 63–64
In-person service-learning
, 155–156, 173–174
Interactive Learning Network (ILN)
, 15
Internal consultants
, 60–62
Internal consulting vs. external consulting
, 60–62
Internship
, 163
Ivy Leagues
, 17–23
students
, 2
universities
Brown University
, 18–19
Columbia University
, 19–20
Cornell University
, 20
Dartmouth College
, 20–21
Harvard University
, 21
Princeton University
, 21–22
University of Pennsylvania
, 23
Yale University
, 23, 40
Job seekers
, 162
internship & student
, 163
Learner-centered approach
, 3–4
Learner-centered higher education system
, 3–4
Learning
habits
, 28
See also specific types of learning
Learning Agreement
, 175
Learning Contract
, 122, 172–173, 181–182, 188
Legal considerations, e-consulting
, 173
Massive open online courses (MOOCs)
, 10, 11–13, 21–22, 23
advantages
, 13
disadvantages
, 14
dropout rates
, 14
Mass-scale distance education
, 39
Master of Health Care Delivery Science
, 21
Master of Liberal Arts in Extension Studies
, 21
Master of Science in Human Resource (MSHR)
, 147–150
client-organizations in
, 152–153
e-consulting initiative
, 153
program at Western Carolina University
, 151–153
Medical schools
, 40
Meeting
agenda for feedback
, 75
one-on-one
, 63
Purpose of the Meeting
, 73
Millennial generation learners and workers
, 56
MITx platform
, 12
MOOCs. See Massive open online courses (MOOCs)
MSHR. See Master of Science in Human Resource (MSHR)
Multi-course certificate programs
, 20
Nanodegrees programs
, 42
National Center for Education Statistics (2016)
, 2–3
“The next web”
, 25–26
Non-profit corporations
, 66
Non-profit executive directors
, 64–65
Non-profit organizations
, 65, 66
Not-for-profit organizations vs. for-profit organizations
, 66–67
On-demand learning
, 13
One-on-one meetings
, 63
Online courses
, 10
service-learning in
, 80–82
Online degree program, e-consulting initiative in an
, 147–150
Online education
, 10, 33, 35–39, 46–47
Online environments, building relational bonds in
, 110–112
Online learning
, 51–52
limitations
, 53–55
Online schools
, 40
Online service-learning
, 56
Online students
, 150–151
Open distance education universities
, 35
Organizational barriers
, 107–108
Organizational leaders
, 59–60
Paid consulting vs. pro bono consulting
, 64–66
Pedagogy, service-learning as
, 53
Personality-based trust
, 106
Pew Research Center survey (2016)
, 3
Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine
, 40
Phone-based distance learning program
, 15
Press release
, 121, 141
Princeton University
, 21–22
Pro bono consulting vs. paid consulting
, 64–66
Project Manager
, 91–94, 180
e-consulting
, 160–161
job description
, 95–96
selection
, 91–94
Psychosocial trait
, 105
Publicity
, 159
Reading habits
, 28
“Read-Only” web
, 23–24
“Read-Write-Publish web” era
, 24
Reflection papers
, 185
end-of-course
, 165–167
self
, 142–143
Remote technology
, 40
Retention, student
, 53
Risk-taking behavior
, 107
Samepage
, 63, 171–172, 182
Samepage.io
, 169–170
virtual chat
, 170
Self-fulfillment
, 160
Self-reflection
consultant
, 142–143
students
, 185
Self-reflection paper
, 142–143
Semantic Web
, 24–25
Semester-long courses
, 78
Service. See specific types of service
Service-learning
, 53–55, 159
defined
, 158–159
definition
, 45–46
enhance relationships
, 53
in-person
, 155–156, 173–174
offerings in online environments
, 46–47
in online courses
, 80–82
as pedagogy
, 53
practices, traditional
, 183, 188
practitioners
, 46–47
traditional
, 46, 48
value of
, 55
See also E-service learning
Skills
acquired through e-service-learning
, 55
expert
, 59–60
Small Business Administration’s website
, 89–90
Social responsibility
, 5, 56, 151, 159
corporate
, 162
Student
as consultants
, 77–80
retention
, 53
self-reflection
, 185
Student–consultant
, 55, 101–102
teams
, 117
Swift trust
, 104, 105
situations
, 107
in virtual teams
, 105–114
client commitment
, 112–114
individual barriers
, 106–107
organizational barriers
, 107–108
team barriers
, 109–110
technological barriers
, 108–109
Symbiotic educational relationship
, 51–52
Synchronous communication
, 172, 174
Synchronous technology
, 182, 188
Taproot Foundation
, 65
Team leader (consulting team)
, 94–97
job description
, 98–99
Team leaders/students, e-consulting
, 161–163
alumni students and business professionals
, 162
internship & student job seekers
, 163
Technology
asynchronous
, 182, 188
based tools
, 54
e-service learning
, 182–183
remote
, 40
synchronous
, 182, 188
Three-step e-consulting model
, 117
action
, 120
communication with the client
, 135–136
consultancy preparation
, 122
during the consulting process
addressing low client and student engagement
, 132–134
client’s resistance to change
, 134–135
compliant client
, 135
discovery and dialogue
, 119–120
entry and contracting
, 119
evaluation and withdrawal
, 120–122
feedback and design for action
, 120
first “meet & greet” call with the client
, 122–132
call preparation
, 122–124
client’s needs and expectations
, 125
consultant’s skills and experience
, 125
organizational assessment and audit form
, 127–132
post-consulting implementation and client–consultant relationship closure
, 139–143
closing the relationship
, 140–141
consultant’s self-reflection
, 142–143
ensuring successful implementation
, 139–140
presenting the final consulting project draft
, 138–139, 140
presenting the first draft of the consulting work to the client
, 136–138
dealing with the client’s demands
, 137
resetting goals and expectations
, 138
Traditional community service
, 155–156, 173–174
Traditional distance learning models
, 33
Traditional service-learning
, 46, 48
Traditional service-learning practices
, 183, 188
Trust
development
, 104–114
personality-based
, 106
See also Swift trust
TXT
, 63
Udacity
, 11, 12
United States
current trends in distance education
, 9
distance education outside the
, 33–40
growth rate of online enrollments in
, 9–10
higher education institutions, online-learning enrollments in
, 45–46
University
and administration
, 158–160
Brown University
, 18–19
Columbia University
, 19–20
Cornell University
, 20
Harvard University
, 21
Princeton University
, 21–22
Yale University
, 23
See also specific types of university
University of North Carolina Engagement Report (2015)
, 45
University of North Carolina system
, 148–150
University of Pennsylvania
, 23
University’s McGraw Center for Teaching and Learning
, 21–22
Virtual consulting vs. in-person consulting
, 63–64
Virtual environment, challenges of working in
, 109
Virtual teams, swift trust in
, 105–114
Volunteerism
, 4–5
Web development
, 24–26, 34–35, 36–38
1990–2000. Web 1.0
, 24
2000–2010. Web 2.0
, 24–25
2010–2020. Web 3.0
, 25
2020–2030. Web 4.0 and 5.0
, 25–26
WeFeelFine.org
, 25–26
Western Carolina University, MSHR program at
, 151–153
Workforce, highly-skilled
, 1–2
Yale University
, 23
- Prelims
- Introduction
- Part I Theoretical Underpinnings
- Chapter 1 Distance Education
- Chapter 2 Service-Learning and e-Service-Learning
- Chapter 3 Service-Learning and Consulting
- Part II Application: Integration of e-Service-Learning
- Chapter 4 The Consulting Team
- Chapter 5 The Three-step e-Consulting Model
- Part III Recommendations for Success
- Chapter 6 Case Study
- Chapter 7 Benefits of e-Service-Learning and e-Consulting
- Chapter 8 Recommendations for a Successful e-Service-Learning Integration
- Conclusion
- References
- Index