Index

Governance of the Smart Mobility Transition

ISBN: 978-1-78754-320-1, eISBN: 978-1-78754-317-1

Publication date: 13 March 2018

This content is currently only available as a PDF

Citation

(2018), "Index", Marsden, G. and Reardon, L. (Ed.) Governance of the Smart Mobility Transition, Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 167-174. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78754-317-120181014

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018 Emerald Publishing Limited


INDEX

Apple (company)
, 6

Australia

AV deployment
, 125–127

urban planning
, 126–127

context for interviews with planners of
, 127–129

Australian Design Rules
, 58

Automated vehicles (AV)
, 11, 20, 22, 52, 66, 70–71, 141

deployment frame
, 124

deployment in Australia
, 125–127

innovations
, 43

in United Kingdom
, 79–80

vehicles
, 34

Automating transport in United Kingdom
, 70–71

Automation
, 66

Automobility
, 4, 66, 140

in transport governance
, 53–55

Autonomous vehicles. See Automated vehicles (AV)

‘B-riders’ implementation
, 92–93

Behavioural change
, 96–97

beneficial
, 38

national Dutch programme and
, 87

programmes
, 89–90

in target groups
, 86

Behaviours
, 3, 45

adaptability and
, 60

of early innovators
, 4

Beter Benutten (BB)
, 87, 89–90

Biofuels
, 37

BMW
, 6, 23, 71

Brabant region
, 92–93

Burn Fat Not Fuel (BFNF)
, 87, 90, 91

Business models
, 8, 34, 111, 158

choice of
, 37

of most ‘smart’ transport providers
, 22

and resilience
, 37–39

of smart mobility companies
, 7

California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)
, 110

Car sharing
, 8, 52, 55–57

Categories, and framing in transport governance
, 53–55

Centre on Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CCAV)
, 73

Commodification of urban mobility
, 43

Congestion
, 10, 42–43

pricing
, 116

Connected and Autonomous Vehicle (CAV)
, 74

Consumers
, 72

protection
, 42

Corporatized governance
, 125, 133

Cruise Automation
, 70–71

Culture
, 3

hyper mobile
, 26

wars
, 29

Cyberattack
, 39

Cycleways
, 53–54

Decision-making processes
, 89

Demand of mobility services
, 20

Democracy
, 69, 80, 161

decentralizing
, 118

TM principles
, 73

Democratic institutions
, 160

Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
, 73

Dependents
, 89

Deviants
, 89

Disruptive potential
, 7

Disruptive transport businesses and modes
, 54

Disruptive transport technologies, planning for

AV deployment and urban planning in Australia
, 126–127

fragmentation of effort
, 133

government
, 130–131

government as facilitator of integrated supply
, 131–132

public sector knowledge gaps
, 132–133

uncertainty hampering planning
, 129–130

Diversity, TM principles
, 73

Door-to-door

mobility
, 37

service
, 26

‘Drive Me London’ programme
, 74–77

‘Drive-by-wire’ technologies
, 70

Driverless technologies. See Automated vehicles

Driverless vehicles. See Automated vehicles

Economy
, 3, 23, 68

post-Brexit
, 71

sharing
, 25, 36–37, 52, 110, 111

Eindhoven (hub for technological innovation)
, 92

Electric mobility
, 53

Epistemic experimentation
, 54–55, 60

European MaaS Alliance
, 36

Experimentation
, 9, 69–70, 73–74, 162

absence in
, 78

epistemic
, 54–55, 60

places of
, 78

from the operational and reflexive levels
, 79–80

Facilitator, government as (integrated supply)
, 131–132

‘First and last mile’
, 57

Fiscal re-adjustment
, 10

Footpaths
, 53–54, 58

Fragmentation of effort
, 133

Framing

positive
, 41

in transport governance
, 53–55

Freedom, false promise of
, 39–41

Full MaaS vision
, 37

‘Future technology adopters’
, 78

General Motors
, 126

Gett taxis
, 42

Global Financial Crisis (GFC)
, 71

Global technology companies
, 6

Google
, 6

Governance
, 5–6, 124, 127–128

capacities
, 119

capacity transformation
, 108–109

of governance
, 6

implications for
, 41–44

network
, 8

outcomes
, 115–120

processes
, 67

smart mobility and
, 6–12

urban
, 34

See also Transport governance

Governance challenges in era of ‘smart’ mobility

autonomous mobility system
, 22–23

fork in road
, 26–29

negative externalities of mass car
, 23–24

on-demand transport services
, 26

transport governance
, 24–25

transport projects
, 21–22

Governmental capacity

congestion charging in Stockholm
, 112–114

disruption in transport sector
, 106–108

policy success, implementation processes and governance outcomes
, 115–120

ridesourcing in San Francisco
, 109–112

transforming governance capacity
, 108–109

Greenhouse gas emissions
, 40

Hands-off

approach
, 21

mentality
, 11

government
, 144, 148

Hands-on

governance
, 11

government
, 144

Hegemonic automobility
, 52

High-profile technology companies
, 113

House of Lords Science and Technology Select Committee (2017)
, 81n1

Implementation processes
, 109, 115–120

Inclusivity
, 69, 73, 80

Incremental politics, Transition Management (TM)
, 68

Industrial Strategy Green Paper
, 72–73, 78

Information and communications technologies (ICT)
, 34, 39, 42

ICT-based aggregation services
, 35

ICT-personal device
, 94

network
, 39

Infrastructure and Environment (I&M)
, 90

Innovations
, 8–9

Institutions
, 3

Integrated supply, government as facilitator of
, 131–132

‘Intelligent Mobility Fund’ mechanism
, 78

Interconnections, Transition Management (TM) levels
, 79–80

Interdependence of organizations
, 5

International Transport Forum
, 22, 141, 163

Interviewees
, 90, 130–131, 132

and fragmentation
, 133

responses of
, 89–90

and students
, 97

Interviews

with Australian planners
, 127–129, 134

with decision-makers
, 89–90

with public sector officials
, 11

semi-structured
, 129

IT-enabled ridesourcing services
, 106

Legacy
, 10

Lisbon example
, 141

Losers
, 157–159

Lyft
, 6, 42, 159

Maastricht
, 90–92

Maastricht Bereikbaar (MB)
, 91

Market regulation
, 35

Market-driven approaches
, 10

Market-led scenario
, 148

Meta-governance
, 6

Metropolitan Planning Organizations
, 129

Midland Metro trams
, 42

Mobile customers
, 41

Mobility
, 67–68, 142–143

aggregators
, 27

system
, 3, 86

Mobility as a Service (MaaS)
, 3, 8, 34–35, 40, 41, 42, 52

business models and resilience
, 37–39

complexities and contradictions in
, 37

construction of
, 35

ecosystem
, 43

false promise of freedom
, 39–41

global
, 36, 37, 39

implications for governance
, 41–44

innovators
, 43

MaaS-type model
, 24

partial
, 36

‘pre’ MaaS
, 36

Scotland
, 36

sharing economy
, 36–37

Mobility-on-demand
, 52

Modality switchers
, 94, 96

Motor vehicle
, 23

Motorized (electric) personal mobility devices
, 52

Multi-Sided Platform nature of MaaS
, 37–38

Multiple stakeholders
, 119

National Express buses
, 42

New Pubic Management
, 10

New South Wales
, 58, 60

Nissan
, 71

Nokia
, 41

Non-car user employees working for BB members
, 96–97

Non-car-based modes
, 9

On-demand
, 20

matching of supply
, 20

transport services
, 26

Operational governance
, 73–78

Operational phase of Transition Management (TM)
, 73–78

Outsourcing innovation
, 43

‘Ownership’ of vehicles
, 3

‘Pay-As-You-Go’
, 40

Pedestrian environments, regulating motorized use of
, 59

Pedestrian walks
, 58

Personal mobility devices (PMDs)
, 57–60

Personal transport sector
, 35

Policy

process, vs.
, 108–109

success
, 115–120

transport policy world
, 108

urban policymaking
, 118

Policymakers
, 97

Political infrastructures
, 53–54

Politics
, 159–161

‘Post-political’ narrative of transport provision
, 9

Principle domain of pedestrians, and regulations
, 58

Private cars
, 22

Private sector
, 124–125

Producers
, 72

interests
, 21, 26

producer-led visions
, 43

Public authorities
, 41

Public sector

knowledge gaps
, 132–133

leadership
, 115

Public transport
, 4, 8, 42, 147, 148, 158

Altamonte Springs
, 38

fixed public transport systems
, 28

free access to
, 97

involvement in MaaS
, 35

providers
, 42

solutions
, 115

Reflexive governance
, 66–67, 78–79

and experimentation
, 67–70

Reflexive phase in Transition Management (TM) cycle
, 78–79

Regulated infrastructures
, 53–54

Regulatory frameworks
, 53

Ride-hailing service
, 38

Ridesharing
, 115

Ridesourcing
, 106–107, 109, 115–116

services
, 108

Roads
, 53–54, 58

Rule-making process
, 110

San Francisco

comparison with Stockholm
, 115

ridesourcing in
, 109–112, 115

Scenario

exercise
, 144–146

outcomes
, 147

planning
, 144

results of scenarios exercise
, 146–149

Science and Technology Studies (STS)
, 86–87, 89

and SCPD for studying smart mobility target groups
, 87–89

Segways
, 58–59

“Self-driving” vehicles. See Automated vehicles

‘Self-organizing’ networks
, 5

Self-reflexive process
, 79

Self-reinforcing system of automobility
, 3

Service

aggregators
, 6

smart mobility
, 158

types
, 34

Sharing economy
, 25, 36–37, 52, 110, 111

Shipping channels
, 53–54

Smart innovations
, 7

Smart mobility
, 2, 2–4, 20, 24, 52, 349

automobility, categories, and framing in transport governance
, 53–55

banner
, 36

car sharing
, 55–57

and governance
, 6–12

innovations
, 4

PMDs
, 57–60

services
, 158

technologies
, 87, 107

Smart mobility policies

Brabant
, 92–93

case studies
, 90

findings
, 93–94, 95

Maastricht
, 90–92

methods
, 89–90

modality switchers
, 94, 96

students
, 97

traffic participants
, 98

winners and losers
, 157–159

Smart mobility transition
, 43, 107

congestion charging in Stockholm
, 112–114

disruption in transport sector
, 106–108

ridesourcing in San Francisco
, 109–112

transforming governance capacity
, 108–109

Smart technology
, 107

Smart transition
, 20–22, 24–28

Smart transport
, 22, 28

Smartcard-based integrated ticketing systems
, 36

Social and cultural characterizations
, 88

Social Construction and Policy Design (SCPD)
, 86–87

and STS for studying smart mobility target groups
, 87–89

Social Construction of target groups
, 93

Societal system levels
, 68

Socio-technical innovation
, 22

State capacity
, 10

State role
, 5, 6

Steering
, 5

Stockholm

congestion charging in
, 112–114

traffic management
, 112

Strategic management
, 44

Strategic phase in Transition Management (TM) cycle
, 72–73

Strategic priorities
, 111

Students
, 97

Sustainability
, 86

sustainable urban transport
, 37

sustained interaction of networks members
, 5

transitions
, 66–67

Sydney, car sharing in
, 55–56

Tactical measures
, 111

Tactical phase in Transition Management (TM) cycle
, 73

Technological disruption
, 53

Technology
, 3

global technology companies
, 6

high-profile technology companies
, 113

smart
, 107

smart mobility
, 87, 107

Telecommunications
, 39

network congestion
, 39

Time
, 10

Top-down mechanisms
, 6

Toyota
, 126

Traffic

congestion
, 40

participants
, 98

signal
, 2

Traffic in Towns
, 23

Transition
, 140, 141, 156

management
, 67–70

mobility
, 66

See also Smart mobility transition

Transitions Management (TM)
, 66–67

Transport
, 21, 42

direct
, 6–7

disruption in transport sector
, 106–108

networks
, 39

planning
, 127

policies
, 53, 108

professionals
, 37

sector
, 39

servicing
, 115

systems
, 2

technologies
, 37

Transport governance
, 24–25, 52

automobility, categories, and framing in
, 53–55

See also Governance

Transport Systems Catapult
, 81n2

Transportation network companies (TNCs)
, 110

Transportation services
, 8

Uber
, 6, 7, 38, 42, 52, 54–55, 159

Uncertainty
, 129–130

United Kingdom, automating transport in
, 70–71

Urban air pollution
, 40

Urban governance
, 34

Urban logistics services
, 34

Urban planning
, 125

in Australia
, 126–127

involvement of urban planning professionals in Stockholm
, 119

public purpose of
, 124

Urban policymaking
, 118

Urban vision
, 119

‘Usership’ of vehicles
, 3

Vehicle manufacturers
, 71

Vehicle-sharing service
, 36

Volkswagen
, 71

Volvo
, 70

‘Drive Me London’ programme
, 74–77

Volvo Research and Educational Foundations (VREF)
, 121

Window of opportunity
, 156–157

capacity to steer
, 161–163

politics
, 159–161