Muslim and Christian conflict styles in Western Europe
International Journal of Conflict Management
ISSN: 1044-4068
Article publication date: 15 February 2011
Abstract
Purpose
This study seeks to examine the influence of national and religious identification on conflict styles among Christians and Muslims in Western Europe.
Design/methodology/approach
Data were gathered in France, Germany and the UK (n=909) in 2008. Conflict was measured using Oetzel's Conflict Style Measure. To test the hypothesis and answer the research questions, multiple regression models were constructed.
Findings
National and religious identification had a significant influence on conflict style preference. Muslims prefer more compromising and obliging conflict styles, while Christians prefer the dominating style. France is more dominating than Germany or the UK. Significant interactions revealed how individuals' religion and national identification influence conflict styles.
Research limitations/implications
The use of self‐report instruments is the primary limitation.
Practical implications
Individuals' lived experiences have a significant influence on their conflict preference. The results in France, Germany and the UK point to varied ethnic and religious lived experiences.
Social implications
The primary social impact of this paper is that it informs individuals and governments of the effects of religion on individuals' management of conflict. In the wake of the bombings of September 11, the 2005 French riots, and the 2005 London bombings, understanding the potential influence of religion on the management and conceptualization of conflict offers vast societal impacts for society at large.
Originality/value
There are few studies in conflict that examine the influence of religion and/or national identification. Moreover, this is one of the few studies to examine how Muslims manage conflict.
Keywords
Citation
Croucher, S. (2011), "Muslim and Christian conflict styles in Western Europe", International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 60-74. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444061111103625
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2011, Emerald Group Publishing Limited