To read this content please select one of the options below:

Do fights prohibit helping? The influence of task interdependence and conflict norms on helping behavior during task conflict

Sonja Rispens (Department of Organizational Psychology and Human Resource Development, Faculty of Behavioral Sciences, Twente University, Enschede, The Netherlands)

International Journal of Conflict Management

ISSN: 1044-4068

Article publication date: 24 April 2009

1657

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of group conflict norms and task interdependence on individuals' willingness to help others under conditions of task conflict to better understand how group characteristics influence individual helping behavior.

Design/methodology/approach

A total of 81 university students participate in a scenario study. The scenario has a 2 (task interdependence: high vs low) ×2 (group conflict norm: open vs avoiding) design.

Findings

The results suggest that in groups characterized with open conflict norms and high‐task interdependence members are less willing to help than members in groups with avoiding conflict norms and high‐task interdependence.

Research limitations/implications

This research implies that helping behavior in high‐task interdependent workgroups is highest when groups have an avoiding conflict norm. Limitations include amongst others discussing the explicit request for help coming from the group used in this study and the external validity of scenario studies.

Practical implications

The findings suggest that managers or supervisors can help to provide circumstances in which task conflict does not prohibit helping behavior.

Originality/value

The paper offers a first step to experimentally investigate how individuals react to intragroup task conflict and the consequence for constructive behavior.

Keywords

Citation

Rispens, S. (2009), "Do fights prohibit helping? The influence of task interdependence and conflict norms on helping behavior during task conflict", International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 158-172. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444060910949612

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2009, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles