Assessment of the validity of Netemeyer et al.'s (1996) WFC and FWC scales

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the current paper is to continue assessment of the construct and predictive validity of the Netemeyer et al. Work Family Conflict (WFC) and Family Work Conflict (FWC) scales while reassessing the scales for possible improvements.

Design/methodology/approach

Data were collected from workers in a poultry processing plant to reassess Netemeyer et al.'s WFC and FWC scales. Carlson et al. were unable to include Netemeyer et al.'s items in constructing and validating their new measures of WFC and FWC. This paper assesses and extends the validation of the Netemeyer et al. scales.

Findings

This study supports the notion that a reduced model of both scales (four items for WFC and three items for FWC) fit the data in the sample better than the original five‐item measures presented by Netemeyer et al. By deleting items from each scale more variation in the constructs was accounted for and reduced unexplained error. By clarifying the measurement of WFC and FWC, the substantive predictive model in the paper was supported. In addition, both WFC and FWC predicted individuals' intention to quit, indicating potential predictive validity for these modified scales.

Originality/value

While this is a reassessment of a previously used scale, the improvements in functionality (decreased items needed for assessment) and potential for predictive validity of the modified scales result in an exciting new avenue for WFC and FWC research.

Citation

Boyar, S.L., Carson, C.M., Mosley, D.C., Maertz, C.P. and Pearson, A.W. (2006), "Assessment of the validity of Netemeyer et al.'s (1996) WFC and FWC scales", International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 34-44. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444060610734163