Measurement equivalence and applicability of core marketing concepts across Nigerian, Kenyan, Japanese and US firms

Abstract

Establishing the validity and measurement equivalence of core marketing concepts in the emerging market economies of Africa is a key step in assessing the transferability of modern marketing theory and managerial practice to these countries. However, measurement equivalence issues are rarely addressed in studies of marketing practices in Africa. Accordingly, this study examines the equivalence of core marketing concepts based on interviews of 459 marketing managers from Kenya, Nigeria, Japan and the USA. The results show that optimal scaling analysis of the managers’ evaluations provide more valid and meaningful assessment than that of the raw data. The managers’ evaluations of the concepts revealed amazingly similar or prototypical perceptions of marketing’s core concepts and its applicability in their organizations, despite the profound country environmental differences. It appears that the concepts fall into two cross‐national categories of applicability that permeate the industrialized and developing country categorization. Managerial and research implications are discussed.

Citation

Dadzie, K.Q., Johnston, W.J., Yoo, B. and Brashear, T.G. (2002), "Measurement equivalence and applicability of core marketing concepts across Nigerian, Kenyan, Japanese and US firms", Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 17 No. 6, pp. 430-455. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620210442802