Human capital development: comparative analysis of BRICs
Abstract
Purpose
The goal of this article is to conduct macro‐level analysis of human capital (HC) development strategies, pursued by four countries commonly referred to as BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India, and China).
Design/methodology/approach
This analysis is based on comparisons of macro indices of human capital and innovativeness of the economy and a review of related academic literature and government publications.
Findings
The study results suggest that in terms of present human capital capacity Russia and Brazil are ahead of China and India. However, during the last decade the governments of the latter two countries have initiated impressive national programs of HC development, which include significant investment and targeted government regulation in such areas as primary and secondary education, vocational education and training, and higher education, especially in science and technology fields. Russia and Brazil have targeted programs in some of the above areas, but lack comprehensive long‐term strategies, covering all the above areas and coordinating effort of various agencies and constituencies.
Research limitations/implications
It is recommended to expand the scope of analysis to include other fast growing developing economies (e.g. Mexico, Indonesia, and Turkey).
Originality/value
The article provides, for the first time, a comparison of human capital development indices and strategies of the four largest developing economies. The original feature of the article is a combination of the analysis of macro‐level indices with an in‐depth analysis of policy documents and academic literature.
Keywords
Citation
Ardichvili, A., Zavyalova, E. and Minina, V. (2012), "Human capital development: comparative analysis of BRICs", European Journal of Training and Development, Vol. 36 No. 2/3, pp. 213-233. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591211204724
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited