Selected antecedents and components of ethical decision‐making processes of American and South African marketers – A cross‐cultural analysis

Abstract

Compares the personal ethical ideologies of idealism and relativism of American marketers with their South African counterparts. The perceptions of ethical problems, ethical intentions, and coporate ethical values of the parties are also contrasted. The findings indicate that South Africans were more idealistic and less relativistic than their American counterparts. The hypotheses that there will be no differences between South African and American marketers in terms of their ethical perceptions and intentions were not supported. The results generally indicate that South African marketers are more likely to perceive ethical problems than American marketers. However, the survey results revealed that South African marketers tend to be less ethical in their intentions to resolve an ethical problem than their American counterparts. Corporate citizens of South African firms were found to have slightly higher corporate ethical values than their American counterparts, as hypothesized.

Citation

Singhapakdi, A., Higgs‐Kleyn, N. and Rao, C.P. (1999), "Selected antecedents and components of ethical decision‐making processes of American and South African marketers – A cross‐cultural analysis", International Marketing Review, Vol. 16 No. 6, pp. 458-475. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651339910300440