To read this content please select one of the options below:

Union Autonomy, a Terminal Case in the UK? A Comparison with the Approach in Other European Countries and the USA

Patricia Fosh (The Management School, Imperial College, University of London, UK)
Huw Morris (Kingston Business School, Kingston University, UK)
Roderick Martin (Glasgow University Business School, UK)
Paul Smith (School of Management and Finance, Nottingham University, UK)
Roger Undy (Templeton College, Oxford University, UK)

Employee Relations

ISSN: 0142-5455

Article publication date: 1 March 1993

308

Abstract

Since 1979, the Conservative government in the UK has introduced wide‐ranging and detailed regulations for the conduct of union internal affairs; a number of other Western industrialized countries have not done so (or have not done so to the same extent) but have continued their tradition of relying on unions themselves to establish democratic procedures. Alternative views of the role of the state in industrial relations underlie these differences. A second, linked article, appearing in Employee Relations (Vol. 15 No. 4), examines state approaches to union autonomy in the context of attitudes towards other controls on union activities and attempts to explain the successive shifts in British policy in the UK since the 1960s.

Keywords

Citation

Fosh, P., Morris, H., Martin, R., Smith, P. and Undy, R. (1993), "Union Autonomy, a Terminal Case in the UK? A Comparison with the Approach in Other European Countries and the USA", Employee Relations, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425459310038852

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1993, MCB UP Limited

Related articles