Case studies

The objective of this study is to grasp the strategic decisions made by Haidilao during the COVID-19 pandemic and the effect on its business performance. It seeks to evaluate the company’s adaptability and resilience, understand the significance of effective regional management and draw lessons for businesses operating in crisis situations.

This case study provides an in-depth analysis of the strategic decisions made by Haidilao in the face of rapid expansion and COVID-19’s impact. It scrutinizes Haidilao’s shift from expansion to contraction, the execution of the “Woodpecker Project,” and the reinstatement of a regional management system.

This case study is suitable for MBA courses.

Teaching notes are available for educators only.

CSS11: Strategy.

On completion of the analysis of this case, students would be able to: analyze how external environmental factors impact the product market matrix; evaluate growth choices open to an incumbent business and how they create and capture value; and develop corporate strategies of a multi-business firm to respond to external dynamics.

The case presents an opportunity to examine the timing of entry of an incumbent firm in a new market segment. Bajaj Auto, a well-established Indian two-wheeler and three-wheeler manufacturer and exporter, chose to enter the electric vehicle space much later than technology start-ups and other incumbents. After three years, the company’s business in this segment might appear successful, but it is not in a position to dislodge the market leader, Ola Electric. The case focuses on the dilemma of market entry timing, positioning of a new product, managing an interlinked product portfolio, the need to develop a robust ecosystem of partners and dealing with unpredictable export markets.

The case can be discussed in a session of graduate-level business strategy/corporate strategy/international business course that deals with the growth strategies of an incumbent.

Teaching notes are available for educators only.

CSS 11: Strategy.

This case study aims to provide a focused and specific understanding of the growth challenges faced by Bangalore International Airport Limited (BIAL) in its revenue streams, the strategies used to overcome them by adopting environmental, social and governance (ESG) framework and set global standards with universal norms and make BIAL a world-class airport by applying value, rarity, imitability and organization (VRIO) framework.

BIAL developed and has been operating the Kempegowda International Airport near Bengaluru in India since 2008. This city is the capital of Karnataka in India and a startup of new businesses and information technology hub. The COVID-19 pandemic had profoundly impacted aviation industry including BIAL, resulting in a significant decline in both passenger traffic and cargo handling resulting in weak profitability.

Mr Anant Sharma as chief strategist officer of the company was assigned to formulate strategies for various challenges that BIAL is facing in terms of the pending expiry of a concession agreement, decreasing non-aero revenues and making appropriate strategies to help BIAL not only to grow but also be sustainable in future.

This case study offers opportunities to students to delve into making strategic choices with developing an ESG business impact for sustainability, exploring factors which are affecting the future of airports which are followed internationally and finding key pillars for airport business to grow in its business portfolios. The case study also investigates into how BIAL would be able to accommodate demand in the next 30 years and provide readers the directions to innovate new strategies using VRIO framework to help airport to grow in right direction and become world-class airport.

This case study is suitable for basic courses in strategic management in emerging market both at postgraduate level and undergraduate level. In addition, it can be used in corporate training programs for aviation industry professionals.

Teaching notes are available for educators only.

CSS 11: Strategy.

The case study aims to achieve the following learning objectives post discussion by the students: evaluate Social Entrepreneurship Quotient of Anish Malpani, founder of WITHOUT; understand Sustainable Development Goals to which the start-up aims to contribute; apply the framework of SWOT analysis to the social start-up; and analyze triple bottom line and triple top line concepts to identify approach of WITHOUT.

Malpani’s eco-conscious start-up named “Ashaya Recyclers Pvt. Ltd.” is the first of its kind in the world, selling sunglasses made from recycled postconsumer metalized multi-layered plastic packaging (MLP) under the brand name WITHOUT. MLP generally ends up in landfills. It is a low-value, high-volume composite waste that is considered economically and technically “impossible” to recycle. The founder wanted to do something good out of the recycled stuff instead making money. Will Ashaya’s early breakthrough and now patented technology be able to bring significant change in the waste management system in India?

This case study is suitable for undergraduate BBA and postgraduate MBA courses.

Teaching notes are available for educators only.

CSS 4: Environmental Management.

The case describes a real company, real people and real situations. The authors have used real names other than the name of the cosmetic formulation company and the product design company – which the authors address as “the Florida company” and “the product design company,” respectively. The authors used both secondary and primary data to develop this case study. The case originated from the guest lecture given by Paige in one of the author’s classes. Following her guest lecture, the authors asked her permission to develop her story into a case study, and she graciously consented. The authors obtained background information about the company – Aer Cosmetics, from the company website, news articles and the TEDx talk delivered by Paige. The authors followed it with Paige’s interview, which the authors recorded and transcribed. Based on this interview and the information collected from the other sources, the authors developed the final version of the case study. Paige read and approved the final version for its factualness and sequence of events. The case was then informally reviewed by professors who have published their case studies in the target journal. The authors revised the case study based on this feedback and again obtained Paige’s approval on the case text before submission to the journal.

This case is set in May 2024. Paige DeAngelo, the CEO of Aer Cosmetics, was disappointed with the sales of her newly launched sustainable mascara product. She had been a student entrepreneur at Drexel University for the last three years. She developed her product with the help of the university incubator and other entrepreneurial support systems available at Drexel and outside. Paige had graduated in December 2023. Drexel University allowed its students to remain in their incubator program only up to one year after graduation. Thus, with seven months remaining, it is time for Paige to decide how she would manage the next growth phase of her business. The students are put into the shoes of Paige DeAngelo. They are asked to decide whether to extend their stay in the incubator program, venture out and be an independent business entity, pitch the company for acquisition by corporations, or leverage other entrepreneurial support systems in the environment to grow the company. Students need to craft a strong argument, either supporting the options they advocate for or opposing those they reject.

This case was written primarily for upper-division undergraduate courses but is also suitable for MBA courses.

This case study draws on secondary sources, which are cited in the case and included in the “References and Other Supporting Materials” section of the teaching note, as well as a semi-structured interview with the case’s protagonist to accurately portray the context, considerations and competing interests necessary for students to make an evidence-based recommendation about 5 Generation Bakers’ future. The case protagonist (Scott Baker) gave the author team written permission to use identifying information from the interview. As such, the authors made no attempt to disguise any names or facts pertaining to this case. As a descriptive incident, it illustrates widely used theoretical concepts and models. The case provides students the opportunity to identify theoretical concepts and practical management strategies moving forward in academic and management settings. No AI was used in writing either the case or teaching notes.

Scott Baker, owner of 5 Generation Bakers in McKees Rocks, PA, found himself in a difficult position in October 2015. Needing to find a new facility to expand his bakery business and meet the needs of the modern bakery industry, Scott was on his way to a meeting with officials from Cranberry Township promising a sleek, modern facility in an area with lower taxes and promising access to transportation. This tempting offer came at a cost: uprooting his loyal employees and abandoning McKees Rocks after several decades of his family operating a bakery there. On that October day, a twist emerged – the newly vacant lot of a recently closed Bottom Dollar store offered a chance to expand locally. Now, the family business owner had to decide: pursue the new facility in Cranberry, or revitalize his business and stay local. This case is widely applicable but is most directly relevant to modules related to ethics, corporate social responsibility, family business dynamics and stakeholder management analysis in management and leadership courses.

This case is most applicable to business students at the undergraduate or graduate level in entrepreneurship, business strategy, ethics, or related fields. The case is particularly relevant for modules in decision-making, corporate social responsibility, stakeholder management and family business dynamics.

This case analyzed a mix of publicly accessible primary and secondary sources ranging from blog posts to academic articles. Taken together, the case study shows the reoccurring arguments made by self-advocates.

Most of the videos and speeches mentioned in this case study are available online, and students can read/watch them in addition to reading the details presented here.

Autism Speaks entered the nonprofit scene in 2005 and rapidly became a powerful organization that raised substantial funds, collaborated with influential people and shaped public discourse on autism. However, from the beginning, the organization faced considerable criticism from self-advocates within the autism community who argued that the organization’s negative, medicalized narratives of autism undermined the neurodiversity movement’s goals of acceptance and inclusion. Tensions intensified over the next decade, with grassroots activists and disability rights organizations like the Autistic Self Advocacy Network demanding the inclusion of more autistic perspectives in the organization’s leadership and decision-making processes. The Autism Speaks controversy represents a powerful case study on how nonprofits should ethically represent their beneficiaries, collaborate with the community and engage with activist stakeholders.

This case study was designed for graduate or undergraduate students studying organizational ethics, nonprofit management or nonprofit funding and development.

After completion of the case study, students will be able to enumerate the unique process of project management, address unforeseen challenges in large-scale projects and develop strategies for mitigating risks. This case gives an opportunity to learners to analyses the time impact of failure of such infrastructure projects using project evaluation technique. The students would be able to discuss the social and financial implications of such mishaps on the overall economy.

The case tells the story of Gokhale Bridge in Andheri, Mumbai which serves as a vital link between the densely populated suburb’s, eastern and western part. Originally built in 1975, the bridge collapsed in 2018. The 90-m bridge reconstructed in just 15 months was lauded as an “Engineering marvel” by Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), a civic body responsible for Mumbai’s infrastructure. However, during the grand inauguration on February 26, 2024, a critical misalignment with the adjoining CD Barfiwala Flyover was revealed. This 2-m gap rendered the bridge inaccessible to motorists, undermining its intended purpose and frustrating commuters and residents. The case highlights systemic issues in operations and challenges faced by the BMC. Despite the BMC’s substantial budget and history in managing Mumbai’s infrastructure, the Gokhale Bridge debacle raises serious questions about project management. Amidst public criticism, BMC threw the buck on railways and hired two reputed Engineering colleges to propose solutions to rectify the menace. This situation emphasizes the need for meticulous oversight and risk analysis in civic projects, making the Gokhale Bridge a symbol of both ambition and caution. The case study is intended for Graduate, Postgraduate students in Project management and operations. It is also beneficial for Executive education programs intended government officials, civil servants and project managers.

Undergraduate, Postgraduate, Executive education.

Teaching notes are available for educators only.

CSS 9: Operations and Logistics.

The case study aims to achieve the following learning objectives, structured according to the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy: First, explore the corporate governance framework: recall the roles and responsibilities of key stakeholders at UCICI Bank and AUDIOCON Group and their coordination in governance structures; interpret the principles of stakeholder theory and their application in governance decision-making processes; apply ethical frameworks like the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics Framework and the Josephson Institute Ethical Decision-Making Model to evaluate governance effectiveness; analyse governance lapses and identify gaps in oversight and stakeholder coordination; and propose reforms in governance frameworks to prevent future fraud; evaluate how effectively the governance structure addresses corporate fraud. Second, examine the concept of conflict of interest: understand the ethical and legal implications of conflicts of interest presented in the case; apply knowledge to assess corporate governance failures related to conflict of interest; analyse oversight lapses and identify causes for governance failure; evaluate SEBI regulations on conflict of interest and recommend strategies to mitigate such conflicts in corporate settings; explore the concept of related party transactions (RPTs); understand how RPTs influence governance and stakeholder interests; apply governance principles to assess the legality of RPTs in the case; analyse risks and ethical concerns associated with RPTs and governance failures linked to these transactions; and evaluate proposed regulatory reforms to enhance oversight and transparency. Third, derive key lessons from the case: understand areas for improvement in corporate governance practices, internal reporting mechanisms and whistleblower protections; apply lessons to create strategies for improving governance practices and protecting stakeholders; analyse systemic governance flaws that contributed to the fraud; evaluate the effectiveness of governance practices in preventing similar frauds in the future; and create recommendations for improving governance, ethics and whistleblower policies. Fourth, examine basic issues and remedial measures: understand the root causes of governance failures in the case; apply knowledge of corporate governance principles to recommend reforms in regulatory and accountability frameworks; analyse weaknesses in the existing governance system that enabled fraudulent activities; evaluate the feasibility of proposed remedial measures for transparency and ethical practices; and create new governance policies to enhance accountability and prevent future frauds.

By studying the UCICI AUDIOCON Loan Fraud Case, the above objectives are aimed to shed light on the complex dynamics of corporate governance, conflicts of interest, regulatory compliance, wrongdoing reporting mechanism, whistle-blower policy and reputation risks within the banking industry. The findings and insights from the case study can contribute to improving governance practices and strengthening the integrity of financial institutions.

The UCICI – AUDIOCON loan fraud case epitomises a crisis in corporate governance, spotlighting ethical breaches at the highest echelons of leadership. This case study delves into the dilemma faced by UCICI Bank’s Board of Directors regarding the prosecution of its former CEO, Mhanda Mochhar. Accusations of impropriety stem from a suspicious loan of US$391.57m to AUDIOCON Group, allegedly facilitated by Mochhar in exchange for personal benefits. The ensuing investigation unearthed violations of banking regulations, including non-disclosure, conflict of interest and RPTs. The pivotal board meeting, dissected in this study, underscores the delicate balance between accountability and reputational damage. Through analysis and debate, stakeholders grapple with the repercussions of their decisions on the bank’s integrity and stakeholder trust. The case encapsulates broader lessons on corporate governance, conflict of interest and regulatory oversight, serving as a springboard for critical inquiry and strategic reform in the financial sector. As the saga unfolds in the courtroom, this study provides a lens into the complexities of corporate morality and the imperative for robust governance frameworks.

This case study can be used in classes/subjects such as Finance, Strategic Management, Corporate Governance, Business Ethics and Law for (Vidgen, Hindle, & Randolph, 2020).▪ Graduate students and officials.

Teaching notes are available for educators only.

CSS1: Accounting and Finance.

The case study was developed based on secondary data from the publicly available initial accident report of PIA flight PK8303. The facts presented in the report were then analyzed in the light of the Human Factor Analysis and Classification System (HFACS).

The case revolves around the terrible aviation mishap that occurred on May 22, 2020, when Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) Flight 8303 crashed in a Karachi residential area. A total of 97 people lost their lives in this tragedy, and it was Pakistan’s 18th major aviation disaster. The case study explores the human errors and failures of ground handling agencies, air traffic controllers, regulatory agencies, airline employees and cockpit crew by using the HFACS. The focus remains on mistakes made by people, which revolve around inefficient and ineffective communication, and contempt of safety regulations at various stages of flight PK8303.

The case study is designed for the students of aviation management at undergraduate and graduate levels.