Search results

This study aims to analyze the effect of social media marketing (SMM), generated by doctors and dentists, on consumers’ purchase intention, via the influence of the value co-creation perception, brand equity and consumer brand engagement. Additionally, this study analyzes the moderating role of purchase frequency.

A sample of 110 respondents was surveyed using a self-administered questionnaire. The partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to test the research hypothesis.

The findings reveal that SMM positively influences value co-creation perception. Value co-creation perception positively influences brand equity and consumer brand engagement. Brand equity positively influences purchase intention. The moderating role of frequency was confirmed. However, the effects of consumer brand engagement on purchase intention were not confirmed.

The study findings enable healthcare marketers to develop social media marketing and branding strategies to engage consumers and increase perceived value, brand equity and purchase intention of healthcare services.

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to introduce SMM as an antecedent of the relationship between value co-creation and brand equity. This study is also the first to test the relationship between value co-creation and brand equity in the healthcare sector. A new integrated model was proposed to understand the effects of SMM on the intention to purchase healthcare services.

This paper aims to review the latest management developments across the globe and pinpoint practical implications from cutting-edge research and case studies.

This briefing is prepared by an independent writer who adds their own impartial comments and places the articles in context.

The paper examines how value co-creation provides the mechanism through which social media marketing impacts brand equity and customer engagement in healthcare services.

The briefing saves busy executives, strategists, and researchers hours of reading time by selecting only the very best, most pertinent information and presenting it in a condensed and easy-to-digest format.

We present a critical literature review debating Brazilian research on social and environmental accounting (SEA). The aim of this study is to understand the role of politics in the construction of hegemonies in SEA research in Brazil. In particular, we examine the role of hegemony in relation to the co-option of SEA literature and sustainability in the Brazilian context by the logic of development for economic growth in emerging economies. The methodological approach adopts a post-structural perspective that reflects Laclau and Mouffe’s discourse theory. The study employs a hermeneutical, rhetorical approach to understand and classify 352 Brazilian research articles on SEA. We employ Brown and Fraser’s (2006) categorizations of SEA literature to help in our analysis: the business case, the stakeholder–accountability approach, and the critical case. We argue that the business case is prominent in Brazilian studies. Second-stage analysis suggests that the major themes under discussion include measurement, consulting, and descriptive approach. We argue that these themes illustrate the degree of influence of the hegemonic politics relevant to emerging economics, as these themes predominantly concern economic growth and a capitalist context. This paper discusses trends and practices in the Brazilian literature on SEA and argues that the focus means that SEA avoids critical debates of the role of capitalist logics in an emerging economy concerning sustainability. We urge the Brazilian academy to understand the implications of its reifying agenda and engage, counter-hegemonically, in a social and political agenda beyond the hegemonic support of a particular set of capitalist interests.