Search results

This paper aims to understand how organizations can apply the Blue Ocean Shift process to achieve profitable growth and make competition irrelevant.

This paper uses a case study approach. Based on interaction with the senior management of an organization and secondary sources, this paper presents an application of the Blue Ocean Shift process on a strategic move by an organization to achieve value innovation.

This paper presents a case of how Tata Motors Ltd. applied Blue Ocean Shift process to come up with the product Tata Ace, which achieved value innovation while making competition irrelevant. From assessing the current state of play to forming a motivated team, working with suppliers and fulfilling the needs of the non-customers and unhappy existing users, they were able to create a strong position for themselves.

Blue Ocean Strategy, through a process defined as Blue Ocean Shift, can be applied by organizations to achieve value innovation, change market boundaries and achieve profitable growth through their strategic offerings. It can help them get out of “red oceans” which may be a way to view the existing hypercompetitive world.

This paper contributes to the application of the Blue Ocean Shift process in the Indian context while studying a strategic move of an Indian firm. It showcases an example of how large Indian organizations can successfully apply the process to achieve value innovation.

Corporate finance, strategic financial management, financial innovation and financial engineering.

The case is suitable for graduate level management students.

In early April 2011, Mr Ramakrishnan, the CFO of Tata Power Ltd and members of his team were busy re-evaluating fundraising options for financing Tata Power's capital expenditure requirements, for refinancing of debt, for working capital related to current projects and for liquidity to support potential acquisition bids. The team had the task of evaluating different innovative funding options as the challenge was to strike a fine balance between maintaining the owners' equity without dilution of control and avoiding any adverse impact on credit rating that could increase the cost of capital; these constraints reduced flexibility for fund raising. Keeping in mind the global market scenario and estimating the investor appetite were factors critical to the structuring of a funding instrument.

The case will help students to be comfortable in thinking about evaluating markets, financial instruments and weigh rating considerations and regulatory constraints for taking capital structure decisions.

Teaching notes are available for educators only. Please contact your library to gain login details or email support@emeraldinsight.com to request teaching notes.

This case has been developed from both secondary and primary sources. Primary sources included an interview with a co-founder of Cars24 and discussions with company personnel. The secondary sources include the company website, media coverage and analyst reports. These reports provided inputs for this case. Independent market studies and regulatory filings were used to triangulate facts and information.

Cars24 was founded in India in 2015 when the country had a low motorization level. Buying a vehicle, specifically a car, had always been a status symbol in India. The used car industry was fragmented. The organized sector was just 12% of the market (see Case Exhibit 4). Buyers could purchase used cars from a dealer with value-added services like car ownership paper transfer, finance and insurance or from a known person. The Indian used car market was supply-constrained, and existing dealers had lived with this problem. Cars24 had realized this difficulty, so when they entered the industry, their first move was to handle the supply side of the business. They aimed to secure the supply of cars to build a robust business model. A hungry dealer market would get the supply of the used car, and the sellers would get an unparalleled selling experience. By the end of FY19, Cars24 had the most extensive network for used cars in India. In 2020, it entered the Unicorn Club. Cars24, a used car industry entrant, had unlocked demand and became an industry leader with a blend of “disruptive” and “nondisruptive” growth. Their next strategic move was to convert buying and selling of used cars into a retail business. Online purchases were on the rise in India due to internet penetration, and Cars24 borrowed the idea from the e-commerce industry to design its retail business vertical. In 2020, due to COVID-19, trust in online channels and the demand for personal vehicles increased, which developed into an opportunity for Cars24. It seized this new opportunity to expand market boundaries by selling used cars online.

Their results for 2022 reported INR 51bn approximately as revenue from operations. Vikram Chopra (founder and CEO) recognized that while losses of Cars24 had reduced as compared to the previous year, concerns remained on cash usage and on making the business sustainable. This would entail continuing to increase the scale of operations, strengthen cash generation and finally move closer to registering profits. The team, led by Chopra, got together on October 17, 2022, for a long day of brainstorming on the performance of the firm for the year 2021–2022 and to discuss the critical next steps. It was time to go back to the drawing board to consider new strategic moves toward growth and profitability and to review the cost structure.

This case is intended primarily for graduate-level management programs, including Master of Business Administration (MBA). This case can be used in Strategic Management, Blue Ocean Strategy and Entrepreneurship courses. It can also be used as a capstone segment in a Blue Ocean Strategy course. If used as a module in a Strategy Management or Entrepreneurship course, the instructor may wish to use a session ahead of the case to introduce the class to the frameworks to be applied.

The learning outcomes of this study are as follows:1. Learn to analyze a hostile takeover bid from the perspectives of the acquirer, target firm’s management and a large institutional investor in the target firm.2. Review the structuring, financing, valuation, mode of consideration, legal and regulatory aspects of a hostile takeover.3. Understand the role of the target firm’s board in a hostile takeover transaction.4. Address “to sell or not to sell” dilemma of a large institutional investor in the target firm in the event of a tender offer given financial and non-financial considerations.

On June 14, 2019, Pulak Prasad, Founder and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) at Nalanda Capital, in consultation with other managing partners at Nalanda Capital, had to decide whether to tender a 10.6% equity holding in Mindtree Ltd. in an unsolicited open offer made by Larsen and Toubro (L&T) Ltd. Until then, Nalanda Capital, led by Prasad, had aligned with the Mindtree founders and had led a campaign to thwart L&T’s bid to acquire Mindtree; L&T’s offer to acquire 31% of Mindtree shares was because of open on June 17, 2019 and it is time for Prasad and the management team to take a reasoned call – whether to stay in Mindtree or to exit? Associated aspects included – What could be the consequences of not selling the stake? What could be L&T’s game plan? Could Mindtree continue to create wealth for its shareholders under L&T?

This case is appropriate for Mergers & Acquisitions and Strategic Financial Management courses in modules focused on structuring, financing and takeover defence techniques in a hostile takeover transaction. The case is appropriate for graduate MBA and EMBA programmes.

Teaching notes are available for educators only.

CSS 1: Accounting and Finance.

The case includes links to video clips on textile and apparel manufacture to familiarize students with the textile manufacturing process. The case also provides links to audio and video clips of the case protagonist discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the cluster at IK.

The case offers opportunities for the learner to analyze the situation from three cases as follows: industry, cluster (broadly location) and firm. Specific teaching objectives are as follows: How to identify and analyze the drivers of competitiveness of a cluster. Assess the strength of clusters using Porter’s Diamond framework. Map the linkages between players of a cluster as follows: across firms, industries and public organizations. Benchmark and compare clusters to identify opportunities for upgrading competitiveness.

The case describes the challenge facing Mr Nikunj Bagdia, the owner and chief executive of Ken Enterprises Private Limited (Ken), a textile manufacturing unit located in the town of Ichalkaranji (IK), in October of 2019. IK boasts the largest number of cutting-edge air-jet looms in India and Ken is IK’s largest exporter of woven textile fabrics. However, IK lags the textile and apparel manufacturing cluster of Tiruppur, in another region of the country. The case enables a microeconomic analysis of the business environment of industrial clusters and a cluster mapping exercise, which helps identify opportunities for enhancing IK’s textile cluster. As the case closes, Nikunj is trying to prioritize opportunities that could emerge from the analyzes.

Masters/MBA level courses on competitiveness, strategy for economic development and microeconomics of competitiveness.

CSS 11: Strategy.