Search results
1 – 1 of 1Cheryl Henderson‐Smart, Tracey Winning, Tania Gerzina, Shalinie King and Sarah Hyde
To develop a method for benchmarking teaching and learning in response to an institutional need to validate a new program in Dentistry at the University of Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
Purpose
To develop a method for benchmarking teaching and learning in response to an institutional need to validate a new program in Dentistry at the University of Sydney, Australia.
Design/methodology/approach
After a collaborative partner, University of Adelaide, was identified, the areas of teaching and learning to be benchmarked, PBL approach and assessment, were established. A list of quality indicators for these aspects of teaching and learning were first developed conceptually and then validated by the literature. Then, using a quality enhancement framework, levels of achievement for each indicator were developed.
Findings
The findings are represented as a set of tables. These were mutually developed with the benchmarking partner and represent an agreed model for a benchmarking project to progress to the next stages of implementation and evaluation.
Practical implications
This model can be adapted for any benchmarking project in all levels of education; primary, secondary, tertiary and continuing.
Originality/value
The issue of benchmarking is high on the educational agenda, especially in higher education. The literature reports on a number of projects but with no clear explanation of a method for benchmarking. The fact that this model is evidenceābased in its approach and that it focuses on learning and teaching, also marks it as original and a significant development in this area.
Details