Search results

To maximize the network total profit by calculating the difference between costs and revenue (first objective function). To maximize the positive impact on the environment by integrating GSCM factors in RL (second objective function). To calculate the efficiency of disassembly centers by SDEA method, which are selected as suppliers and maximize the total efficiency (third objective function). To evaluate the resources and total efficiency of the proposed model to facilitate the allocation resource process, to increase resource efficiency and to improve the efficiency of disassembly centers by Inverse DEA.

The design of a closed-loop logistics network for after-sales service for mobile phones and digital cameras has been developed by the mixed-integer linear programming method (MILP). Development of MILP method has been performed by simultaneously considering three main objectives including: total network profit, green supply chain factors (environmental sustainability) and maximizing the efficiency of disassembly centers. The proposed model of study is a six-level, multi-objective, single-period and multi-product that focuses on electrical waste. The efficiency of product return centers is calculated by SDEA method and the most efficient centers are selected.

The results of using the model in a case mining showed that, due to the use of green factors in network design, environmental pollution and undesirable disposal of some electronic waste were reduced. Also, with the reduction of waste disposal, valuable materials entered the market cycle and the network profit increased.

(1) Design a closed-loop reverse logistics network for after-sales services; (2) Introduce a multi-objective multi-echelon mixed integer linear programming model; (3) Sensitivity analysis use Inverse-DEA method to increase the efficiency of inefficient units; (4) Use the GSC factors and DEA method in reverse logistics network.

The purpose of this paper is to present a stochastic p-robust data envelopment analysis (DEA) model for decision-making units (DMUs) efficiency estimation under uncertainty. The main contribution of this paper consists of the development of a more robust system for the estimation of efficiency in situations of inputs uncertainty. The proposed model is used for the efficiency measurement of a commercial Iranian bank.

This paper has been arranged to launch along the following steps: the classical Charnes, Cooper, and Rhodes (CCR) DEA model was briefly reviewed. After that, the p-robust DEA model is introduced and then calculated the priority weights of each scenario for CCR DEA output oriented method. To compute the priority weights of criteria in discrete scenarios, the analytical hierarchy analysis process (AHP) is used. To tackle the uncertainty of experts’ opinion, a synthetic technique is applied based on both robust and stochastic optimizations. In the sequel, stochastic p-robust models are proposed for the estimation of efficiency, with particular attention being paid to DEA models.

The proposed method provides a more encompassing measure of efficiency in the presence of synthetic uncertainty approach. According to the results, the expected score, relative regret score and stochastic P-robust score for DMUs are obtained. The applicability of the extended model is illustrated in the context of the analysis of an Iranian commercial bank performance. Also, it is shown that the stochastic p-robust DEA model is a proper generalization of traditional DEA and gained a desired robustness level. In fact, the maximum possible efficiency score of a DMU with overall permissible uncertainties is obtained, and the minimal amount of uncertainty level under the stochastic p-robustness measure that is required to achieve this efficiency score. Finally, by an example, it is shown that the objective values of the input and output models are not inverse of each other as in classical DEA models.

This research showed that the enormous decrease in maximum possible regret makes only a small addition in the expected efficiency. In other words, improvements in regret can somewhat affect the expected efficiency. The superior issue this kind of modeling is to permit a harmful effect to the objective to better hedge against the uncertain cases that are commonly ignored.