Siwen Song, Adrian (Wai Kong) Cheung, Aelee Jun and Shiguang Ma
This paper aims to empirically examine the impact of mandatory CSR disclosure on the CEO pay performance sensitivity.
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to empirically examine the impact of mandatory CSR disclosure on the CEO pay performance sensitivity.
Design/methodology/approach
Using the mandatory requirement of CSR disclosure as an exogenous shock, the authors compare the changes in CEO pay performance sensitivity for treatment firms with control firms through a difference-in-difference (DiD) approach.
Findings
The authors find that mandatory CSR disclosure enhances CEO pay performance sensitivity. The results also show that monitoring CEO power is a conduit through which mandatory CSR disclosure affects CEO pay performance sensitivity. The positive impact is more profound in firms with a powerful CEO, i.e. one who is politically well-connected, holds dual roles as both CEO and Chairman, and/or has had a long tenure. Furthermore, the increased CEO pay performance sensitivity after the mandate is prominent among state-owned enterprises (SOEs) only.
Practical implications
The findings of this paper have implications for other economies with similar institutional backgrounds as China. Although the mandatory CSR disclosure does not require firms to spend on CSR investment, the mandatory CSR disclosure alters firm behaviour, and mitigates agency problems.
Originality/value
This paper contributes to the studies on the impact of CSR disclosure on firms' behaviour. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to examine the effects of mandatory CSR disclosure on CEO pay performance sensitivity using the quasi-natural experiment settings.
Details
Keywords
Kelvin Henry Kyissima, Gong Zhang Xue, Thales Pacific Yapatake Kossele and Ahmed Ramadhan Abeid
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the corporate capital structure stability of listed firms in China during the period 1990–2013.
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the corporate capital structure stability of listed firms in China during the period 1990–2013.
Design/methodology/approach
The study uses panel data from a sample of 716 firms that have been listed in China for at least 15 years. A fixed-effects panel data regression model with time effects is used in the estimation.
Findings
The findings show that size, profitability and investment opportunities have a significant influence on capital structure, whereas the tangibility of assets is not found to be significant. Few industries show significance in explaining differences and variation in leverage ratios.
Social implications
It is recommended by this study that corporate managers of listed firms in China should consider leverage ratios variation while choosing the capital structure.
Originality/value
This study can be helpful in assisting companies to make financing decisions and setting up strategies relevant in their growth and profitability. The study will also have a significant assistance to bring to light corporate issues to policy makers, especially in the areas of both equity and debt financing, particularly the bond market. To the society, this study will show the nature of Chinese-listed companies, and it can assist individual investors in making decisions regarding companies in which they hold investments and in making meaningful comparisons with other companies. The paper also aims at contributing to the existing literature on the empirical study on capital structure.