Search results

For corporate communications, it is crucial to know how news media outlets report and frame the sociopolitical activities of multinational corporations (MNCs), including their corporate diplomacy, that affect perceptions of their legitimacy. Therefore, this study aims to identify how local news media frame corporate diplomacy in a host country and, in turn, benefit the media legitimacy of MNCs.

To identify media frames in the host country, a quantitative content analysis involving factor and cluster analyses of 385 articles published in newspapers in the United Arab Emirates from 2014 to 2019 addressing the corporate diplomacy of large European MNCs operating in the country was conducted.

This study identified three media frames, two of which establish moral and pragmatic media legitimacy. Results suggest that media legitimacy grows when news media emphasise institutional relationships between MNCs and local, established organisations and corporate diplomacy's benefits for society.

Findings provide insights into how corporate communications can contribute to legitimacy building by emphasising corporations' relationships with institutional actors in host countries and the benefits of corporate activities for local communities.

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study was the first in corporate communications to empirically investigate news media's role in corporate diplomacy and how media frames contribute to the media legitimacy of MNCs at the moral, pragmatic, regulative and cognitive levels.

Corporations are confronted with growing demands to take a stand on socio-political issues, i.e. corporate social advocacy (CSA), which affects their reputation in the public. Companies use different CSA message strategies, including calling the public to support and act on the issue they advocate. Using reactance theory, the authors investigate the impact of CSA messages with a call to action on corporate reputation in the case of a company's gender equality initiative.

A one-factorial (CSA message with or without a call to action) between-subjects experiment was conducted by surveying 172 individuals living in Switzerland. The CSA messages were created in the context of gender equality.

The authors' study indicates that CSA messages with a call to action compared to those without overall harmed corporate reputation due to individuals' reactance, which is higher for CSA messages with a call to action, negatively affecting corporate reputation. The impact of the CSA message strategy with a call to action on corporate reputation remains significant after controlling for issue alignment and political leaning.

Communicating about socio-political issues, especially taking a stand, is a significant challenge for corporations in an increasingly polarized society and has often led to backlash, boycotts and damage to corporate reputation. This study shows that the possible adverse effects of advocating for socio-political issues can be related to reactance. It emphasizes that companies advocating for contested issues must be more cautious about the message strategy than the issue itself.

Accusations of greenwashing and corporate scandals have increased individuals’ skepticism of companies and their CSR claims. As a result, corporations seek to improve individuals’ perceptions of the credibility and authenticity of their CSR communication. Using signaling theory, this study tested to what extent external certifications from a non-profit organization act as a signal to affect individuals’ skepticism toward CSR, which, in turn, could influence individuals’ perceptions of CSR communication authenticity and credibility.

We conducted a one-factorial (CSR communication with or without CSR certification) between-subjects online experiment, surveying 184 individuals. Mediation analyses were performed to test our hypotheses. Participants were randomly assigned to a made-up corporate website text in which corporate efforts were either certified with the B Corporation Certification, one of the most established non-profit organization’s certifications of CSR or in which no certification was indicated.

The results demonstrate that external CSR certifications decrease individuals’ CSR skepticism and increase the perceived authenticity and credibility of CSR communication. CSR skepticism partially mediated the effect between the certification condition and CSR communication authenticity and credibility.

The study advances CSR communication research by providing empirical evidence of the positive effect of CSR certifications on the perceived authenticity and credibility of CSR communication. Businesses can signal the veracity of their CSR claims by obtaining a CSR certification, which decreases individuals’ skepticism toward CSR.