Search results

1 – 1 of 1
Per page
102050
Citations:
Loading...
Access Restricted. View access options
Article
Publication date: 20 January 2025

Rigin Sebastian, Noufal Naheem Kottekkadan, Toney K. Thomas and Mohammed Niyas KK

This paper aims to critically examine the implications of using generative artificial intelligence (AI) models, such as ChatGPT and Bard, in social science research. It examines…

240

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to critically examine the implications of using generative artificial intelligence (AI) models, such as ChatGPT and Bard, in social science research. It examines the doppelganger effect in AI-driven studies as well as cognitive dissonance brought on by the autonomy of these tools. The discussion also addresses the debate between quantitative and qualitative methods for evaluating AI-driven research, scrutinising existing guidelines for accountability and validity. In addition, the paper considers the potential for generative AI to dominate research, identifying “non-takeoverable” skills and ethical issues in AI-driven knowledge production.

Design/methodology/approach

This work primarily focuses on research articles for conceptual clarity, while news media reports are used to illustrate current scenarios.

Findings

The doppelganger effect makes people worry about situations in which AI copies existing work so well that it becomes possible for people to give the wrong credit. This has led to a critical review of ways to make sure that the outputs of generative AI are real and original. Generative AI can enhance data collection and analysis, offering alternative approaches to traditional research methodologies. By leveraging the capabilities of generative AI, researchers can potentially uncover new insights and perspectives from their data.

Originality/value

It is crucial to acknowledge the ethical concerns associated with using generative AI in social science research. The deployment of such technology introduces the possibility of biases and other ethical challenges that may impact the cognitive abilities of human participants or researchers involved in the research process. The work makes an effort by encouraging ethical consideration and highlighting crucial human abilities that are still necessary, providing a novel viewpoint on the use of generative AI in research approaches.

Details

Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, vol. ahead-of-print no. ahead-of-print
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1477-996X

Keywords

1 – 1 of 1
Per page
102050