Yewande Adetoro Adewunmi, Reuben Iyagba and Modupe Omirin
Benchmarking in FM practice although understood and applied globally, little is known about the practice in Nigeria. The purpose of this paper is to develop a framework to guide…
Abstract
Purpose
Benchmarking in FM practice although understood and applied globally, little is known about the practice in Nigeria. The purpose of this paper is to develop a framework to guide the use of benchmarking.
Design/methodology/approach
The research adopts a cross-sectional survey design. Data were collected using self-administered questionnaires on FM organizations in Lagos metropolis, Abuja and Port Harcourt. The results of the survey were supplemented with interviews with FM unit heads in the study areas. The framework was validated using a focus group discussion with ten FM industry experts.
Findings
A framework which serves as a guide for the use of best practice benchmarking was developed. It showed that there is a relationship between best practice benchmarking and location.
Research limitations/implications
The evaluation of the framework was limited by the number of participants involved and being that it has not been put to use.
Originality/value
This study develops a multi-sector framework to guide the use of best practice benchmarking in facilities management (FM). The framework explains the relationship between organizational characteristics and best practice benchmarking. In addition, there are limited empirical benchmarking frameworks in FM literature.
Details
Keywords
Nathaniel Ayinde Olatunde and Oluwaseyi Olalekan Alao
The purpose of this paper is to compare the cost and time performance of construction projects in public and private universities in Osun State, Nigeria.
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to compare the cost and time performance of construction projects in public and private universities in Osun State, Nigeria.
Design/methodology/approach
Purposive sampling technique was adopted to select four universities (two public and two private) used for the study. Archival data on 40 completed construction projects (ten from each university) was used in the study. Data were analysed with percentile and t-test.
Findings
The study showed that only 35 per cent of the construction projects in public and 10 per cent of those in private universities were completed at the estimated cost. There were no construction projects completed within the planned time in public universities, but 20 per cent were completed within the planned time in private universities. The t-test showed there is no significant difference in performance of construction projects in public and private universities in Nigeria. The study concluded that time performance of public and private universities in Nigeria was still below acceptable international best practices.
Research limitations/implications
The findings of this study are limited to universities’ construction projects and may be of little application to other construction projects outside university settings.
Practical implications
It is recommended that construction stakeholders be more proactive in ensuring that significant improvement is achieved in cost and time performance of construction projects both in public and private universities; the clients need to be more detailed in their briefs and requirements, the designers (architects and engineers) need to be more precise and avoid varying their designs, the quantity surveyors should use their professional competency in cost engineering adequately and the contractor should avoid spurious claims that result in increase in construction cost and time so that performance of construction projects can be improved.
Originality/value
The study is an attempt to compare cost and time performance of construction projects in public and private universities in Osun State, Nigeria.