Hardeep Chahal and Pinkey Devi
This paper aims to explore consumer attitude towards service failure and recovery in the higher education in general and with respect to teaching, examination, library, computer…
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to explore consumer attitude towards service failure and recovery in the higher education in general and with respect to teaching, examination, library, computer lab, administration and infrastructure in particular.
Design/methodology/approach
The data are collected from 120 students of three undergraduate colleges of University of Jammu using purposive sampling.
Findings
The findings reveal that all recovery efforts pertaining to teaching, examination, library, computer lab, administration and infrastructure are significant in overcoming the respective service failures.
Research limitations/implications
The present study is limited to address service failure and service recovery relationship with respect to teaching, examination, library, computer lab, administration and infrastructure and limited to three undergraduate colleges operating in Jammu city only. The sample of the study is small which needs to be considered before generalizing the results.
Originality/value
This study makes a maiden attempt to identify service failure issues with respect to teaching, examination, library, computer lab, administration and infrastructure using quantitative methodology in higher education and role of service recovery strategies in monitoring and reducing service failure.
Details
Keywords
Hardeep Chahal and Pinkey Devi
This paper seeks to explore satisfactory and dissatisfactory service encounters in higher education.
Abstract
Purpose
This paper seeks to explore satisfactory and dissatisfactory service encounters in higher education.
Design/methodology/approach
The data are collected through the well established critical incident technique (CIT) method. All the satisfied and dissatisfied critical incidents are then grouped on the basis of Bitner et al.'s classification under three headings, i.e. service delivery system (group I), (un)fulfilled needs and requests (group II) and polite behaviour/unprompted and unsolicited actions (group III). A total of 20 students took part in the study on a voluntary basis and reported 210 incidents. On average, every student provided ten to 12 incidents.
Findings
The study results identified both satisfied and dissatisfied service encounters in the three identified groups. A majority of the satisfied (62.5 per cent) and dissatisfied (74.5 per cent) critical incidents were related to service delivery system. However the remaining two groups, i.e. (un)fulfilled needs and requests and polite behaviour/unprompted and unsolicited actions, showed a smaller percentage of satisfied and dissatisfied incidents in higher education.
Research limitations/implications
Owing to the exploratory nature of the study and the scope and size of the study sample, the results outlined are tentative in nature. The research study also only investigates the experiences of one stakeholder group (students).
Practical implications
Although universities periodically organise various training programmes and workshops for updating the knowledge of the teachers, these programmes are yet to be made more effective. Hence in this regard it is suggested to design an effective policy for monitoring the usefulness of such programmes.
Originality/value
This study makes a first attempt to pursue CIT across significant service dimensions of higher education that encompass teaching, examination, library, computer lab, administration and infrastructure encompassing both satisfied and dissatisfied incidents which till today has not been considered in the literature.