Most training courses do not ask delegates to evaluate what theyhave learned, merely what they think of the course. Claims that outdoormanagement development courses tend to…
Abstract
Most training courses do not ask delegates to evaluate what they have learned, merely what they think of the course. Claims that outdoor management development courses tend to provide examples of good practice for evaluating courses. States that they also aim to improve management skills and the effectiveness of teams. Discusses types of questions to ask when evaluating courses, and claims that thorough evaluation can add value to training.
Details
Keywords
The purpose of this paper is to outline the need for cultural sensitivity and knowledge when working as a coach with people from different cultural backgrounds.
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to outline the need for cultural sensitivity and knowledge when working as a coach with people from different cultural backgrounds.
Design/methodology/approach
Provides an overview of Hofstede's descriptions of cultural dimensions and explores how an awareness of these can be useful to coaches in their work.
Findings
Executive coaches working with managers from different countries need to be aware of the influence of local culture on the behaviour of the managers. The manager's culture will often be very different to the coach's and understanding these differences can help coaches work more effectively.
Originality/value
The article provides an alternative perspective to the more widespread behaviourally‐based coaching approaches.
Details
Keywords
Peter A.C. Smith and Judy O’Neil
Many organizations now utilize action learning, and it is applied increasingly throughout the world. Action learning appears in numerous variants, but generically it is a form of…
Abstract
Many organizations now utilize action learning, and it is applied increasingly throughout the world. Action learning appears in numerous variants, but generically it is a form of learning through experience, “by doing”, where the task environment is the classroom, and the task the vehicle. Two previous reviews of the action learning literature by Alan Mumford respectively covered the field prior to 1985 and the period 1985‐1994. Both reviews included books as well as journal articles. This current review covers the period 1994‐2000 and is limited to publicly available journal articles. Part 1 of the Review was published in an earlier issue of the Journal of Workplace Learning (Vol. 15 No. 2) and included a bibliography and comments. Part 2 extends that introduction with a schema for categorizing action learning articles and with comments on representative articles from the bibliography.