Search results
1 – 2 of 2NIGEL BROMAGE and DESMOND GRAVES
Concerned about the rising levels of turnover in junior typing staff, the Bank of England commissioned an enquiry by one of their senior personnel officers into the conditions…
Abstract
Concerned about the rising levels of turnover in junior typing staff, the Bank of England commissioned an enquiry by one of their senior personnel officers into the conditions which induced secretarial staff to work at the Bank and which if unfulfilled might cause them to leave. In all 62 Bank employees took part in the study, of which 23 were in the Typists'Training School, 23 were in the Exchange Control Department, and 16 were in the Accountant's Department. Additionally the findings were checked with data obtained from 16 female typists in Shell.
Andrew D. Madden, Sheila Webber, Nigel Ford and Mary Crowder
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between preferred choice of school subject and student information behaviour (IB).
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between preferred choice of school subject and student information behaviour (IB).
Design/methodology/approach
Mixed methods were employed. In all, 152 students, teachers and librarians participated in interviews or focus groups. In total, 1,375 students, key stage 3 (11-14 years) to postgraduate, responded to a questionnaire. The research population was drawn from eight schools, two further education colleges and three universities. Insights from the literature review and the qualitative research phase led to a hypothesis which was investigated using the questionnaire: that students studying hard subjects are less likely to engage in deep IB than students studying soft subjects.
Findings
Results support the hypothesis that preferences for subjects at school affect choice of university degree. The hypothesis that a preference for hard or soft subjects affects IB is supported by results of an analysis in which like or dislike of maths/ICT is correlated with responses to the survey. Interviewees’ comments led to the proposal that academic subjects can be classified according to whether a subject helps students to acquire a “tool of the Mind” or to apply such a tool. A model suggesting how IB may differ depending on whether intellectual tools are being acquired or applied is proposed.
Practical implications
The “inner logic” of certain subjects and their pedagogies appears closely linked to IB. This should be considered when developing teaching programmes.
Originality/value
The findings offer a new perspective on subject classification and its association with IB, and a new model of the association between IB and tool acquisition or application is proposed, incorporating the perspectives of both teacher and student.
Details