Satu Paatela, Soila Karreinen, Moona Huhtakangas and Liina-Kaisa Tynkkynen
In Finland, a major health and social service system reform was implemented in 2023. The reform introduced macro-level organizational integration of health and social services as…
Abstract
Purpose
In Finland, a major health and social service system reform was implemented in 2023. The reform introduced macro-level organizational integration of health and social services as the responsibility for organizing the services was transferred from c. 300 municipalities to 22 well-being services counties which get their funding from the state. The purpose of this study is to describe different leadership actions to promote integration at the meso- and micro-levels of the service system after the macro-level organizational reform.
Design/methodology/approach
The qualitative study utilized semi-structured interviews (n = 25) collected from the upper-level leaders of the well-being services counties. The study participants represented 11 well-being services counties in Finland. The data were collected in May–August 2023. Inductive content analysis was used for data analysis.
Findings
Four leadership actions to promote integration at the meso- and micro-levels of the service system were identified: (1) service user-based leadership actions, (2) partnership-based leadership actions, (3) service system-based leadership actions and (4) knowledge-based leadership actions. Most of the interviewees combined several different leadership actions in their recount.
Originality/value
The study highlights important information of the focus points set for leading integration in the unique context of reforming health and social services. With this paper, we provide a new way of comprehending integration from the leadership point of view. The conceptualization through the different leadership actions may facilitate forming a shared vision for integration among leaders and managers.
Details
Keywords
Maiju Kyytsönen, Marco Tomietto, Moona Huhtakangas and Outi Kanste
The purpose of this study is to review research on hospital-based shared governance (SG), focussing on its core elements.
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to review research on hospital-based shared governance (SG), focussing on its core elements.
Design/methodology/approach
A scoping review was conducted by searching the Medline (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Medic, ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest) and SveMed+ databases using SG and related concepts in hospital settings as search terms (May 1998–February 2019). Only original research articles examining SG were included. The reference lists of the selected articles were reviewed. Data were extracted from the selected articles by charting and then subjected to a thematic analysis.
Findings
The review included 13 original research articles that examined SG in hospital settings. The studied organizations had implemented SG in different ways, and many struggled to obtain satisfactory results. SG was executed within individual professions or multiple professions and was typically implemented at both unit- and organization-levels. The thematic analysis revealed six core elements of SG as follows: professionalism, shared decision-making, evidence-based practice, continuous quality improvement, collaboration and empowerment.
Practical implications
An SG framework for hospital settings was developed based on the core elements of SG, the participants and the organizational levels involved. Hospitals considering SG should prepare for a time-consuming process that requires belief in the core elements of SG. The SG framework can be used as a tool to implement and strengthen SG in organizations.
Originality/value
The review resumes the tradition of systematically reviewing SG literature, which had not been done in the 21st century. General tendencies of the research scene and research gaps are pointed out.
Details
Keywords
Laura Kihlström, Moona Huhtakangas, Soila Karreinen, Marjaana Viita-aho, Ilmo Keskimäki and Liina-Kaisa Tynkkynen
The purpose of this study was to elucidate facilitators and barriers to health system resilience and resilient responses at local and regional levels during the first year of the…
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to elucidate facilitators and barriers to health system resilience and resilient responses at local and regional levels during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Finland.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors utilized a qualitative research approach and conducted semi-structured interviews (n = 32) with study participants representing five different regions in Finland. Study participants were recruited using purposive and snowball sampling. All study participants had been in management and civil servant positions during the first year of the pandemic, representing municipalities, municipalities' social and healthcare services, hospital districts and regional state administrative agencies. All interviews were completed remotely from April to December 2021 and the recordings transcribed verbatim. The authors coded the transcripts in ATLAS.ti 9.1 using directed content analysis.
Findings
The findings highlighted a wide range of localized responses to the pandemic in Finland. Facilitators to health system resilience included active networks of cooperation, crisis anticipation, transitioning into crisis leadership mode, learning how to incorporate new modes of operation, as well as relying on the competencies and motivation of health workforce. The authors found several barriers to health system resilience, including fragmented organization and management particularly in settings where integrated health care systems were not in place, insufficient preparedness to a prolonged crisis, lack of reliable information regarding COVID-19, not having plans in place for crisis communication, pandemic fatigue, and outflux of health workforce to other positions with better compensation and working conditions.
Originality/value
Factors affecting health system resilience are often studied at the aggregate level of a nation. This study offers insights into what resilient responses look like from the perspective of local and regional actors in a decentralized health system. The results highlight that local capacities and context matter greatly for resilience. The authors call for more nuanced analyses on health systems and health system resilience at the sub-national level.