Search results

1 – 4 of 4
Article
Publication date: 6 November 2017

Michael S. Caccese, Clair Pagnano, Eden Rohrer and Xiomara Corral

To analyze the June 9, 2017 Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) interpretive letter permitting the use of Related Performance Information in continuously…

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze the June 9, 2017 Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) interpretive letter permitting the use of Related Performance Information in continuously offered closed-end registered investment company sales materials distributed solely to institutional investors.

Design/methodology/approach

Provides background, including the application of FINRA Rule 2210, and explains the conditions under which fund marketing materials may contain Related Performance Information.

Findings

While the interpretive letter will not result in a fundamental shift in the Industry’s approach to providing Related Performance Information of open- and closed-end funds to institutional investors, it also represents FINRA’s ongoing recognition that communications provided solely to institutional investors do not raise the same investor protection concerns as communications provided to retail investors.

Originality/value

Expert guidance from experienced investment management and investment fund lawyers.

Article
Publication date: 26 August 2014

Michael S. Caccese, Douglas Y. Charton and Pamela A. Grossetti

To explain an administrative law judge (ALJ) decision, along with a censure, fine, and industry disbarment, against an investment adviser for misleading advertising and false…

1853

Abstract

Purpose

To explain an administrative law judge (ALJ) decision, along with a censure, fine, and industry disbarment, against an investment adviser for misleading advertising and false claims of compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS).

Design/methodology/approach

Explains the background to GIPS, the investment adviser’s GIPS violations, the significance of the case, and lessons to be learned by investment advisors on compliance with GIPS standards.

Findings

The decision is particularly significant because the ALJ issued such severe sanctions based solely on false claims of GIPS compliance notwithstanding the fact that all reported performance returns were accurate and no investors relied on or were harmed by the false claims of compliance.

Practical implications

The Zavanelli case should serve to put firms on notice that persistent noncompliance with the GIPS standards can have serious consequences and that all marketing materials should be subject to effective review and approval policies and procedures prior to distribution or publication to ensure compliance with the GIPS standards.

Originality/value

Practical guidance from experienced financial services lawyers.

Details

Journal of Investment Compliance, vol. 15 no. 3
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1528-5812

Keywords

Content available
Book part
Publication date: 19 December 2016

Radha R. Sharma and Sir Cary Cooper

Abstract

Details

Executive Burnout
Type: Book
ISBN: 978-1-78635-285-9

Content available
Article
Publication date: 26 August 2014

Henry Davis

72

Abstract

Details

Journal of Investment Compliance, vol. 15 no. 3
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1528-5812

1 – 4 of 4