Mei-Se Chien and Nur Setyowati
This paper aims to investigate how different uncertainty shocks affect international housing prices.
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to investigate how different uncertainty shocks affect international housing prices.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors set up a model of housing price instability with four uncertainty variables and apply the panel generalized method of moments method and quantile regression to estimate the linear and non-linear linkages among the variables based on data of 56 countries from 2001Q1 to 2018Q2.
Findings
Some empirical findings are as follows. Higher macroeconomic uncertainty and global economic policy risk increase housing price instability, whereas greater financial uncertainty and geopolitical risk present reverse effect. Four uncertainty variables are good signals for housing price changes in Asia, and geopolitical risk takes leading role in Europe. Macroeconomic uncertainty positively impacts housing price instability only at a low or middle level in all regions, as financial uncertainty, global economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risk effects in all regions are smaller at the middle or high level of housing price instability; this confirms the existence of non-linear correlation between each variable.
Originality/value
The findings help investors and policymakers gain a better notion of housing price instability and control into uncertainty signal that could cause housing price instability crash.
Details
Keywords
Mei-Se Chien, Neng-Huei Lee and Chih-Yang Cheng
This paper aims to examine the linkage of regional housing markets between Taiwan and China as increasing economic integration.
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to examine the linkage of regional housing markets between Taiwan and China as increasing economic integration.
Design/methodology/approach
Two time-varying estimations of cointegration tests, Gregory and Hansen (1996) cointegration test with structural break and the recursive coefficients of cointegration (Hansen and Johansen, 1993) are applied to trace the possible dynamic linkage of cross-border regional housing prices between Taiwan and China.
Findings
First, the estimating results of the long-run relationships show that increasing housing prices in Beijing and Shanghai decrease Taipei’s house prices, while Shenzhen and Chengdu have converse effects. The technologies’ levels of Taiwanese industries surrounding the cities in China will affect the direction of the linkage of regional housing prices between the two economies. Second, in light of causalities of these five housing prices’ changes, Beijing and Shanghai lead Taipei and Shanghai leads Chengdu, which, in turn, leads Shenzhen. Finally, the results of time-varying cointegration tests show that some critical economic and political incidents changed the linkages of housing prices between Taipei and the four cities in China.
Originality/value
Although some empirical works examined the linkages between cross-border house prices in Europe and the USA, study has looked at the linkages of cross-border housing prices between Taiwan and China. This is an interesting topic insofar as house price integration has implications for wealth effects that feed into consumer expenditure in both Taiwan and China. The empirical evidence overall displays the existence of the integration of regional housing markets between Taiwan and China. For the longer-term future, increasing economic integration between China and other Asia countries will result in greater and more diversified cross-border housing markets and pools of investors.
Details
Keywords
The purpose of this paper is to examine how global liquidity affects international housing prices. The data sample covers 35 economies from 2000Q1 to 2017Q4.
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine how global liquidity affects international housing prices. The data sample covers 35 economies from 2000Q1 to 2017Q4.
Design/methodology/approach
The existing papers seldom investigated whether the impacts of global liquidity on housing prices display differences between advanced and developing economies. Cesa-Bianchi et al. (2015) is an exceptional study in that they focused on the impulse response of house price volatility to global liquidity shocks but did not examine the long-run equilibrium relationship. To fill the gap in the existing research, this paper used panel cointegration of Pedroni (2000, 2004) to estimate the long-run linkage between global liquidity and housing prices in both advanced and developing economies, and generalized impulse response function (GIRF) and generalized variance decomposition (GVDC) were also applied to capture the relative strengths and contribution of global liquidity shock on house price volatility.
Findings
First, the global liquidity elasticity of housing prices is 0.0679 in developing economies, and 0.0454 in advanced economies, implying that the positive effect of global liquidity on housing prices is higher in developing economies. Next, the results of generalized impulse response indicate that the innovation of global liquidity can significantly and positively impact housing prices only in developing economies and the duration is two quarters. Third, in light of the long-run portions of the global liquidity shock on house price volatility in individual economies, the two highest portions are 28.51% in the USA and 20.04% in the UK, while there are low portions, less than 10%, in most of the European economies. Moreover, comparing the long-run contributions of global liquidity and other variables shock on house price volatility, the contribution of the global liquidity shock ranks the highest or second highest in 21 out of 35 economies, confirming that it played a more important role than other economic variables in explaining house price volatility for most economies.
Originality/value
Compared with the related literature, the contributions of this paper are as follows. First, except for Cesa-Bianchi et al. (2015), the existing papers seldom investigated whether the impacts of global liquidity on housing prices display differences between advanced and developing economies. Hence, the study adopted a wider data sample, including 7 developing economies and 28 advanced economies, to examine the differences in the impact of global liquidity on housing prices between advanced and developing economies. Second, most of the relative literature calculated global liquidity by applying a monetary aggregate, such as M2 or M3, while Cesa-Bianchi et al. (2015) argued that global liquidity being measured by the international supply of credit is intuitively connected to housing prices. This paper follows the argument of Cesa-Bianchi et al. (2015) to use the international supply of credit as the measure of global liquidity, and both the long-run effects and the short-run relative strengths of global liquidity on housing prices are analyzed. Hence, this paper uses not only the GIRF to discuss the short-run relative strengths, as with Cesa-Bianchi et al. (2015) but also the panel cointegration of Pedroni (2000, 2004) to identify the long-run linkage between global liquidity and housing prices. Moreover, GVDC was used to estimate the contribution of a global liquidity shock on house price volatility in individual economies, which can confirm that global liquidity innovations are a very important factor in explaining house price volatility in most countries.
Details
Keywords
This study compares the motives of holding cash between developed (Australian) and developing (Malaysian) financial markets.
Abstract
Purpose
This study compares the motives of holding cash between developed (Australian) and developing (Malaysian) financial markets.
Design/methodology/approach
For the period 2006–2020, the t-test, fixed-effect and generalised method of moment (GMM) model have been applied to a sample of 1878 (1,165 Australian and 713 Malaysian) firms.
Findings
The empirical results reveal that firms in developed financial markets hold higher cash compared to the developing financial markets. The findings confirm that motives to hold cash differ between developed and developing financial markets. The GMM findings further show that cash holdings (CH) in Australia are higher due to higher ratios of cash flow, research and development (R&D) and return on assets (ROA), and lower due to larger dividend payments. In the Malaysian market, however, cash flows and R&D are ineffectual, ROA falls and dividend payments rise CH.
Practical implications
The study helps managers, practitioners and investors understand that firms' distinct economic, institutional, accounting and financial environments are important. To attain the desired outcomes, they must thus comprehend and consider these considerations while developing suitable liquidity strategies.
Originality/value
To the authors' best knowledge, this is the initial research demonstrating how varied cash motives and their ramifications are in developed and developing financial markets. Therefore, this study identifies the importance that CH motives varied among financial markets and that findings from a particular market cannot be generalised to other markets because of the market and financial structural variations.