Search results

1 – 3 of 3
Per page
102050
Citations:
Loading...
Access Restricted. View access options
Article
Publication date: 1 April 1991

Mary C. Heycock

The conflict which can arise when creating or reinforcingcurriculum change in an academic institution is explored, with referenceto the start of the Enterprise in Higher Education…

329

Abstract

The conflict which can arise when creating or reinforcing curriculum change in an academic institution is explored, with reference to the start of the Enterprise in Higher Education Initiative at Leeds Polytechnic.

Details

Education + Training, vol. 33 no. 2
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0040-0912

Keywords

Available. Content available
Book part
Publication date: 5 July 2017

Free Access. Free Access

Abstract

Details

Insights and Research on the Study of Gender and Intersectionality in International Airline Cultures
Type: Book
ISBN: 978-1-78714-546-7

Access Restricted. View access options
Article
Publication date: 1 October 1959

The limitations of the “passing over” defence contained in Section 113, Food and Drugs Act, 1955, especially in its use by an employer to avoid liability for the act or default of…

24

Abstract

The limitations of the “passing over” defence contained in Section 113, Food and Drugs Act, 1955, especially in its use by an employer to avoid liability for the act or default of his employee, have been described in recent issues of the B.F.J., which have also contained a brief historical review of the development of the defence. With the enormous extension in recent years of the sale of factory‐wrapped and packed foods and retailers selling them to the public without prior inspection, unopened in the same state as received from the manufacturers, there have been increasing attempts to use the defence by retailers charged with selling food or drugs not of the nature, etc., under Section 2 of the Act, and especially where this Section has been invoked for the presence of foreign matter in the food. Judgment delivered by the Lord Chief Justice in the case of Chingford Borough Council v. Gwalter and A. & B. C. Chewing Gum Ltd., in the Divisional Court, where the first respondent was the retailer and the second, the manufacturers, the relevant parts of the judgment being reported on page 123 of this issue, emphasises the limitations of the passing‐over defence when used in this way.

Details

British Food Journal, vol. 61 no. 10
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0007-070X

1 – 3 of 3
Per page
102050