Yan Liu, Bryan Fuller, Kim Hester, Rebecca J. Bennett and Marcia Simmering Dickerson
The purpose of this paper is to examine how authentic leadership influences employees’ workplace behavior through three intermediate mechanisms.
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine how authentic leadership influences employees’ workplace behavior through three intermediate mechanisms.
Design/methodology/approach
The cross-sectional surveys were conducted at a large health organization with over 500 employees. Multi-source data were drawn from 124 employees and 16 supervisors.
Findings
This study provides empirical evidence that authentic leadership is positively related to subordinates’ proactive behavior and negatively related to subordinates’ workplace deviance behavior through mediation effects of three psychological factors, including supervisor identification, psychological safety, and job engagement.
Research limitations/implications
Due to the selected survey approach, the data are correlational. The small sample size of the study may reduce the ability to find statistically significant results. The current study would have benefited from organizational data on individual performance and proactive behavior, such as archival annual performance appraisals.
Practical implications
To practitioners, this study provides evidence that authentic leadership is sufficient in creating a positive work climate within which the employees feel safe to contribute their effort on their jobs. Based on the current findings, the practitioners can be more confident to hire or to promote authentic persons to be leaders in the organization.
Originality/value
This study is among those few empirical studies which help to validate the authentic leadership theory and provide a clear understanding of the mechanisms by which authentic leadership influences outcomes.